EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 16 / Numéro 2 (Avril-Juin 2008) Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16 2 (2008) 111-121 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 16, Numéro 2, Avril-Juin 2008
Page(s) 111 - 121
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035
Publié en ligne 16 septembre 2008
  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.A., 1999. Die lernende Organisation : Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxis, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta. [Google Scholar]
  • Bagamoyo College of Arts, Tanzania Theatre Centre, Mabala, R., Allen, K.B., 2002. Participatory action research on HIV/AIDS through a popular theatre approach in Tanzania, Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 333-339. [Google Scholar]
  • Bammer, G., 2005. Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization, Ecology and Society, 10, 2. [Google Scholar]
  • Becher, T., 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Milton Keynes (England) / Bristol, PA (USA), Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck, U., 1986. Risikogesellschaft : Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag. 7Becker, E., Jahn, T., Stiess, E., 1999. Exploring Uncommon Ground: Sustainability and the Social Sciences, in Becker, E., Jahn, T. (Eds.), Sustainability and the Social Sciences, London, Zed Books Ltd, 1-22. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker, E., Jahn, T., 2000. Sozial-ökologische Transformationen – Theoretische und methodische Probleme transdisziplinärer Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, in Brand, K.-W. (Ed.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transdisziplinarität : Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, Berlin, Analytica. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker, E., Jahn, T. (Eds.), 2006. Soziale Ökologie : Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen, Frankfurt/New York, Campus. 10 Bloor, D., 1991. Knowledge and Social Imaginary, Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Brand, K.-W., 2000. Nachhaltigkeitsforschung : Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse eines neuen Forschungstypus, in Brand, K.-W. (Ed.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transdisziplinarität : Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, Berlin, Analytica, 9-28. 12 Brewer, G.D., 1999. The challenges of interdisciplinarity, Policy Sciences, 32, 4, 327-337. [Google Scholar]
  • Burger, P., Kamber, R., 2003. Cognitive Integration in Transdisciplinary Science: Knowledge as a Key Notion, Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 43-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Checkland, P., 1985. From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 9, 757- 767. [Google Scholar]
  • Checkland, P., 1994. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, T.W., 1999. Interdisciplinary problem solving: Next steps in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Policy Sciences, 32, 4, 393-414. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, T.W., 2002. The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals, New Haven/London, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., 2003. A vision of the future of science: reintegrating the study of humans and the rest of nature, Futures, 35, 6, 651-671. [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland R., Norgaard, R., 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics, Boca Raton, St. Lucie Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Creswell, J.W., 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Daele, W. van den, Krohn, W., 1998. Experimental implementation as linking mechanism in the process of innovation, Research Policy, 27, 8, 853-868. [Google Scholar]
  • Defila, R., Di Giulio, A., 1999. Evaluating Transdisciplinary Research, Panorama, Special Edition, Swiss Priority Programme Environment, 1, 29. [Google Scholar]
  • Deppert, W., 1998. Problemlösen durch Interdisziplinarität, in Theobald, W. (Ed.), Integrative Umweltbewertung : Theorie und Beispiele aus der Praxis, Berlin, Springer, 35-64. [Google Scholar]
  • Elzinga, A., 1996. Shaping worldwide consensus The orchestration of global climate change research, in Elzinga, A., Landström, C. (Eds.), Internationalism and Science, Cambridge, Taylor Graham Publishing, 223-253. [Google Scholar]
  • Elzinga, A., Jamison, A., 1995. Changing policy agendas in science and technology, in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C., Pinch, T.J. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage, 572-597. [Google Scholar]
  • Fleck, L., 1986. The problem of epistemology, in Cohen, R.S., Schnelle, T. (Eds.), Cognition and Facts: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 79-112. [Google Scholar]
  • Friend, J., Hickling, A., 2005. Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, Oxford, Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., 1993. Science for the post- normal age, Futures, 25, 7, 739-755. [Google Scholar]
  • Galison, P., 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Giri, A.K., 2002. The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity, Futures, 34, 1, 103-115. [Google Scholar]
  • Greenwood, D.J., 1999. Action research: From Practice to Writing in an International Action Research Development Program, Amsterdam, Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  • Groß, M., Hoffmann-Riem, H., 2005. Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: Designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment, Public Understanding of Science, 14, 269-284. [Google Scholar]
  • Groß, M., Hoffmann-Riem, H. Krohn, W., 2005. Realexperimente: Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft, Bielefeld, transcript Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Grunwald, A., 1999. Ethische Grenzen der Technik? Reflexion zum Verhältnis von Ethik und Praxis, in Grunwald, A. and Saupe, S. (Eds.), Ethik in der Technikgestaltung – Praktische Relevanz und Legitimation, Berlin, Springer, 221-252. 36 Grunwald, A., 2004. Strategic knowledge for sustainable development. The need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 150-167. [Google Scholar]
  • Gutscher, H., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Werner, K., 1996. Vom Sinn der Methodenvielfalt in den Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, in Kaufmann-Hayoz, R., Di Giulio, A. (Eds.), Umweltproblem Mensch : Humanwisssenschaftliche Zugänge zu umweltverantwortlichem Handeln, Bern, Paul Haupt, 43- 78. [Google Scholar]
  • Häberli, R. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., 1998. Transdisziplinarität zwischen Förderung und Überforderung. Erkenntnisse aus dem SPP Umwelt, Gaia, 7, 3, 196-213. [Google Scholar]
  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., Brun, G., 2007. Ethische Probleme nachhaltiger Entwicklung, in Kaufmann[-Hayoz], R., Burger, P., Stoffel, M. (Ed.), Nachhaltigkeitsforschung: Perspektiven der Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, Bern, Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes / Sozialwissenschaften, 235-253. 40 Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Hollaender, K., Loibl, M.C., Wilts, A., 2008. Management, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 383- 395. [Google Scholar]
  • Horlick-Jones, T., Rosenhead, J., 2007. The uses of observation: combining problem structuring methods and ethnography, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 588-601. 42bHubert, B., Bonnemaire, J., 2000. La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée : de nouvelles exigences pour l'évaluation, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 8, 3, 5-19. 43 Hubert, B., Meuret, M., Bonnemaire, J., 2008. Shepherds, sheep and forest fires: A reconception of grazingland management, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U. Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 103- 126. [Google Scholar]
  • Irwin, A., 2001. Sociology and the Environment, Cambridge (UK), Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jantsch, E., 1972. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation, in Apostel, L., et al., Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Paris, OECD, 97- 121. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S. Wynne, B., 1998. Science and decisionmaking, in Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Ohio, Battelle Press, 1-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Klein, J.T., 2008. Education, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher- Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 399-410. [Google Scholar]
  • Krohn, W., 2008. Learning from case studies, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 369-383. [Google Scholar]
  • Kueffer, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G. Bammer, G., van Kerkhoff, L., Pohl, C., 2007. Towards a publication culture in transdisciplinary research, Gaia, 16, 1, 22-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuhn, T.S., 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence, R.J., 2004. Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice, Futures, 36, 4, 487-502. [Google Scholar]
  • Limoges, C., 1993. Expert knowledge and decision-making in controversy contexts, Public Understanding of Science, 2, 417-426. [Google Scholar]
  • Loibl, M.C., 2005. Spannung in Forschungsteams : Hintergründe und Methoden zum konstruktiven Abbau von Konflikten in inter- und transdisziplinären Projekten, Heidelberg, Verlag für Systemische Forschung im Carl-Auer Verlag. 54 Loibl, M.C., 2006. Integrating perspectives in the practice of transdisciplinary research, in Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., Kemp, R. (Eds.), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 294-309. [Google Scholar]
  • MacMynowski, D.P., 2007. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science, Ecology and Society, 12, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Zahn, E., Milling, P., 1972. The Limits to Growth, New York, Universe Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Midgley, G., 2003. Systems Thinking, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, C., 2001. Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime, Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, 4, 478-500. [Google Scholar]
  • Mingers, J., Rosenhead, J., 2004. Problem structuring methods in action, European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 530-554. [Google Scholar]
  • Mittelstraß, J., 1992. Auf dem Weg zur Transdisziplinarität, Gaia, 1, 5, 250. [Google Scholar]
  • Mittelstraß, J., 1996. Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Stuttgart, Metzler. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolini, M., 2001. Sprache-Wissenschaft-Wirklichkeit : Zum Sprachgebrauch in inter- und transdisziplinärer Forschung, Wien, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur. [Google Scholar]
  • Nölting, B., Voß, J.-P., Hayn, D., 2004. Nachhaltigkeitsforschung-jenseits von Disziplinierung und anything goes, Gaia, 13, 4, 254-261. 73 Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Plant, R., 1991. Modern Political Thought, Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Pohl, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., 2007. Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research: Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, München, oekom Verlag. 76 Pohl, C., van Kerkhoff, L., Bammer, G., Hirsch Hadorn, G., 2008. Integration, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 411- 424. [Google Scholar]
  • ProClim, 1997. Research on Sustainability and Global Change: Visions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers, Berne, CASS/SANW. [Google Scholar]
  • Renn, O., Kastenholz, H., Schild, P., Wilhelm, U. (Eds.), 1998. Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs, ETH Zürich, vdf. 79 Robinson, J., 2008. Being undisciplined: Transgression and intersections in academia and beyond, Futures, 40, 1, 70-86. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossini, F.A., Porter, A.L., 1979. Frameworks for integrating disciplinary research, Research Policy, 8, 70-79. [Google Scholar]
  • Schön, D.D., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Aldershot, Hunts, Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
  • Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R., 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387- 420. [Google Scholar]
  • Stokes, D.E., 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Stringer, E.T., 2007. Action Research, Los Angeles, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Truffer, B., Bratrich, C., Markard, J., Peter, A., Wüest, A., Wehrli, B., 2003. Green Hydropower: The contribution of aquatic science research to the promotion of sustainable electricity, Aquatic Sciences, 65, 99-110. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiek, A., 2007. Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation: Experiences from transdisciplinary case studies, Gaia, 16, 1, 52-57. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiesmann, U., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber- Klemm, S., Grossenbacher, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Zemp, E., 2008. Enhancing transdisciplinary research: A synthesis in fifteen propositions, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher- Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 433-441. [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne, B., 1992. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281-304. [Google Scholar]
  • Yanow, D., 2000. Conducting Interpretative Policy Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.