Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 16, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2008
Page(s) 111 - 121
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008035
Published online 16 September 2008
  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.A., 1999. Die lernende Organisation : Grundlagen, Methoden, Praxis, Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta. [Google Scholar]
  • Bagamoyo College of Arts, Tanzania Theatre Centre, Mabala, R., Allen, K.B., 2002. Participatory action research on HIV/AIDS through a popular theatre approach in Tanzania, Evaluation and Program Planning, 25, 333-339. [Google Scholar]
  • Bammer, G., 2005. Integration and implementation sciences: Building a new specialization, Ecology and Society, 10, 2. [Google Scholar]
  • Becher, T., 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Milton Keynes (England) / Bristol, PA (USA), Society for Research into Higher Education, Open University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck, U., 1986. Risikogesellschaft : Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag. 7Becker, E., Jahn, T., Stiess, E., 1999. Exploring Uncommon Ground: Sustainability and the Social Sciences, in Becker, E., Jahn, T. (Eds.), Sustainability and the Social Sciences, London, Zed Books Ltd, 1-22. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker, E., Jahn, T., 2000. Sozial-ökologische Transformationen – Theoretische und methodische Probleme transdisziplinärer Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, in Brand, K.-W. (Ed.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transdisziplinarität : Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, Berlin, Analytica. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker, E., Jahn, T. (Eds.), 2006. Soziale Ökologie : Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen, Frankfurt/New York, Campus. 10 Bloor, D., 1991. Knowledge and Social Imaginary, Chicago/London, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Brand, K.-W., 2000. Nachhaltigkeitsforschung : Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse eines neuen Forschungstypus, in Brand, K.-W. (Ed.), Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Transdisziplinarität : Besonderheiten, Probleme und Erfordernisse der Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, Berlin, Analytica, 9-28. 12 Brewer, G.D., 1999. The challenges of interdisciplinarity, Policy Sciences, 32, 4, 327-337. [Google Scholar]
  • Burger, P., Kamber, R., 2003. Cognitive Integration in Transdisciplinary Science: Knowledge as a Key Notion, Issues in Integrative Studies, 21, 43-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Checkland, P., 1985. From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s, The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36, 9, 757- 767. [Google Scholar]
  • Checkland, P., 1994. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, T.W., 1999. Interdisciplinary problem solving: Next steps in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, Policy Sciences, 32, 4, 393-414. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark, T.W., 2002. The Policy Process: A Practical Guide for Natural Resource Professionals, New Haven/London, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., 2003. A vision of the future of science: reintegrating the study of humans and the rest of nature, Futures, 35, 6, 651-671. [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., Cumberland, J., Daly, H., Goodland R., Norgaard, R., 1997. An Introduction to Ecological Economics, Boca Raton, St. Lucie Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Creswell, J.W., 1994. Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Daele, W. van den, Krohn, W., 1998. Experimental implementation as linking mechanism in the process of innovation, Research Policy, 27, 8, 853-868. [Google Scholar]
  • Defila, R., Di Giulio, A., 1999. Evaluating Transdisciplinary Research, Panorama, Special Edition, Swiss Priority Programme Environment, 1, 29. [Google Scholar]
  • Deppert, W., 1998. Problemlösen durch Interdisziplinarität, in Theobald, W. (Ed.), Integrative Umweltbewertung : Theorie und Beispiele aus der Praxis, Berlin, Springer, 35-64. [Google Scholar]
  • Elzinga, A., 1996. Shaping worldwide consensus The orchestration of global climate change research, in Elzinga, A., Landström, C. (Eds.), Internationalism and Science, Cambridge, Taylor Graham Publishing, 223-253. [Google Scholar]
  • Elzinga, A., Jamison, A., 1995. Changing policy agendas in science and technology, in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Petersen, J.C., Pinch, T.J. (Eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage, 572-597. [Google Scholar]
  • Fleck, L., 1986. The problem of epistemology, in Cohen, R.S., Schnelle, T. (Eds.), Cognition and Facts: Materials on Ludwik Fleck, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 79-112. [Google Scholar]
  • Friend, J., Hickling, A., 2005. Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, Oxford, Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S.O., Ravetz, J.R., 1993. Science for the post- normal age, Futures, 25, 7, 739-755. [Google Scholar]
  • Galison, P., 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Giri, A.K., 2002. The calling of a creative transdisciplinarity, Futures, 34, 1, 103-115. [Google Scholar]
  • Greenwood, D.J., 1999. Action research: From Practice to Writing in an International Action Research Development Program, Amsterdam, Benjamins. [Google Scholar]
  • Groß, M., Hoffmann-Riem, H., 2005. Ecological restoration as a real-world experiment: Designing robust implementation strategies in an urban environment, Public Understanding of Science, 14, 269-284. [Google Scholar]
  • Groß, M., Hoffmann-Riem, H. Krohn, W., 2005. Realexperimente: Ökologische Gestaltungsprozesse in der Wissensgesellschaft, Bielefeld, transcript Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Grunwald, A., 1999. Ethische Grenzen der Technik? Reflexion zum Verhältnis von Ethik und Praxis, in Grunwald, A. and Saupe, S. (Eds.), Ethik in der Technikgestaltung – Praktische Relevanz und Legitimation, Berlin, Springer, 221-252. 36 Grunwald, A., 2004. Strategic knowledge for sustainable development. The need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society, International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1, 150-167. [Google Scholar]
  • Gutscher, H., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Werner, K., 1996. Vom Sinn der Methodenvielfalt in den Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, in Kaufmann-Hayoz, R., Di Giulio, A. (Eds.), Umweltproblem Mensch : Humanwisssenschaftliche Zugänge zu umweltverantwortlichem Handeln, Bern, Paul Haupt, 43- 78. [Google Scholar]
  • Häberli, R. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., 1998. Transdisziplinarität zwischen Förderung und Überforderung. Erkenntnisse aus dem SPP Umwelt, Gaia, 7, 3, 196-213. [Google Scholar]
  • Hirsch Hadorn, G., Brun, G., 2007. Ethische Probleme nachhaltiger Entwicklung, in Kaufmann[-Hayoz], R., Burger, P., Stoffel, M. (Ed.), Nachhaltigkeitsforschung: Perspektiven der Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, Bern, Schweizerische Akademie der Geistes / Sozialwissenschaften, 235-253. 40 Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), 2008. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Hollaender, K., Loibl, M.C., Wilts, A., 2008. Management, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 383- 395. [Google Scholar]
  • Horlick-Jones, T., Rosenhead, J., 2007. The uses of observation: combining problem structuring methods and ethnography, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 588-601. 42bHubert, B., Bonnemaire, J., 2000. La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée : de nouvelles exigences pour l'évaluation, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 8, 3, 5-19. 43 Hubert, B., Meuret, M., Bonnemaire, J., 2008. Shepherds, sheep and forest fires: A reconception of grazingland management, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U. Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 103- 126. [Google Scholar]
  • Irwin, A., 2001. Sociology and the Environment, Cambridge (UK), Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jantsch, E., 1972. Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation, in Apostel, L., et al., Interdisciplinarity: Problems of Teaching and Research in Universities, Paris, OECD, 97- 121. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S. Wynne, B., 1998. Science and decisionmaking, in Rayner, S., Malone, E.L. (Eds.), Human Choice and Climate Change, Ohio, Battelle Press, 1-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Klein, J.T., 2008. Education, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher- Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 399-410. [Google Scholar]
  • Krohn, W., 2008. Learning from case studies, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 369-383. [Google Scholar]
  • Kueffer, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G. Bammer, G., van Kerkhoff, L., Pohl, C., 2007. Towards a publication culture in transdisciplinary research, Gaia, 16, 1, 22-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuhn, T.S., 1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence, R.J., 2004. Housing and health: from interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice, Futures, 36, 4, 487-502. [Google Scholar]
  • Limoges, C., 1993. Expert knowledge and decision-making in controversy contexts, Public Understanding of Science, 2, 417-426. [Google Scholar]
  • Loibl, M.C., 2005. Spannung in Forschungsteams : Hintergründe und Methoden zum konstruktiven Abbau von Konflikten in inter- und transdisziplinären Projekten, Heidelberg, Verlag für Systemische Forschung im Carl-Auer Verlag. 54 Loibl, M.C., 2006. Integrating perspectives in the practice of transdisciplinary research, in Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., Kemp, R. (Eds.), Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 294-309. [Google Scholar]
  • MacMynowski, D.P., 2007. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: Power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science, Ecology and Society, 12, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Zahn, E., Milling, P., 1972. The Limits to Growth, New York, Universe Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Midgley, G., 2003. Systems Thinking, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller, C., 2001. Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime, Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, 4, 478-500. [Google Scholar]
  • Mingers, J., Rosenhead, J., 2004. Problem structuring methods in action, European Journal of Operational Research, 152, 530-554. [Google Scholar]
  • Mittelstraß, J., 1992. Auf dem Weg zur Transdisziplinarität, Gaia, 1, 5, 250. [Google Scholar]
  • Mittelstraß, J., 1996. Enzyklopädie Philosophie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Stuttgart, Metzler. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicolini, M., 2001. Sprache-Wissenschaft-Wirklichkeit : Zum Sprachgebrauch in inter- und transdisziplinärer Forschung, Wien, Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur. [Google Scholar]
  • Nölting, B., Voß, J.-P., Hayn, D., 2004. Nachhaltigkeitsforschung-jenseits von Disziplinierung und anything goes, Gaia, 13, 4, 254-261. 73 Nowotny, H., Scott, P., Gibbons, M., 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Cambridge, Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Plant, R., 1991. Modern Political Thought, Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Pohl, C., Hirsch Hadorn, G., 2007. Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research: Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, München, oekom Verlag. 76 Pohl, C., van Kerkhoff, L., Bammer, G., Hirsch Hadorn, G., 2008. Integration, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 411- 424. [Google Scholar]
  • ProClim, 1997. Research on Sustainability and Global Change: Visions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers, Berne, CASS/SANW. [Google Scholar]
  • Renn, O., Kastenholz, H., Schild, P., Wilhelm, U. (Eds.), 1998. Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs, ETH Zürich, vdf. 79 Robinson, J., 2008. Being undisciplined: Transgression and intersections in academia and beyond, Futures, 40, 1, 70-86. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossini, F.A., Porter, A.L., 1979. Frameworks for integrating disciplinary research, Research Policy, 8, 70-79. [Google Scholar]
  • Schön, D.D., 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Aldershot, Hunts, Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
  • Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R., 1989. Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39, Social Studies of Science, 19, 387- 420. [Google Scholar]
  • Stokes, D.E., 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Stringer, E.T., 2007. Action Research, Los Angeles, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Truffer, B., Bratrich, C., Markard, J., Peter, A., Wüest, A., Wehrli, B., 2003. Green Hydropower: The contribution of aquatic science research to the promotion of sustainable electricity, Aquatic Sciences, 65, 99-110. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiek, A., 2007. Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation: Experiences from transdisciplinary case studies, Gaia, 16, 1, 52-57. [Google Scholar]
  • Wiesmann, U., Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber- Klemm, S., Grossenbacher, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Zemp, E., 2008. Enhancing transdisciplinary research: A synthesis in fifteen propositions, in Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher- Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., Zemp, E. (Eds.), Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, Dordrecht, Springer, 433-441. [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne, B., 1992. Misunderstood misunderstandings: Social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 281-304. [Google Scholar]
  • Yanow, D., 2000. Conducting Interpretative Policy Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA/London/New Delhi, Sage. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.