Open Access
Numéro |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 28, Numéro 3-4, Juillet/Décembre 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 248 - 259 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021009 | |
Publié en ligne | 5 avril 2021 |
- Balsiger P.W., 2004. Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale, Futures, 36, 4, 407-421, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.002. [Google Scholar]
- Barataud F., Hellec F., Levain A., Petit S., 2018. Quand les recherches en sciences sociales s’invitent dans la gestion de l’eau, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 26, 4, 395-406, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018054. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Barré R., 2008. La « recherche prospective environnementale » : une ambition pour la politique de recherche, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16, 1, 57-59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008025. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Bellemare G., Tremblay D., 2007. Le défi de l’interdisciplinarité : ce que les « sciences sociales appliquées » peuvent apprendre des « sciences sociales fondamentales », Études théoriques, https://crises.uqam.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ET0707.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Benyus J.M., 1997. Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature, New York, William Morrow. [Google Scholar]
- Berns M., Townend A., Khayat Z., Balagopal B., Reeves M., Hopkins M.S., Kruschwitz N., 2009. Sustainability and competitive advantage, MIT Sloan Management Review, 51, 1, 19-26, https://image-src.bcg.com/Images/MIT_Sustainability_tcm56-125057.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Berthet E.T., Segrestin B., Weil B., 2018. Des biens communs aux inconnus communs : initier un processus collectif de conception pour la gestion durable d’un agro-écosystème, Revue de l’organisation responsable, 13, 1, 7-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ror.131.0007. [Google Scholar]
- Billaud J.-P., Aubertin C., Hubert B., 2015. Revisiter notre projet éditorial, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 23, 1, 1-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Bocken N.M.P., Short S.W., Rana P., Evans S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039. [Google Scholar]
- Boudens C.J., 2005. The story of work: a narrative analysis of workplace emotion, Organization Studies, 26, 9, 1285-1306, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840605055264. [Google Scholar]
- Bromham L., Dinnage R., Hua X., 2016. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success, Nature, 534, 684-687, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bruun H., Hukkinen J., Huutoniemi K., Thompson Klein J., 2005. Promoting interdisciplinary research: the case of the Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Academy of Finland. [Google Scholar]
- Burt R.S., 1995. Le capital social, les trous structuraux et l’entrepreneur, Revue française de sociologie, 36, 4, 599-628, www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1995_num_36_4_4421. [Google Scholar]
- Catton Jr. W.R., Dunlap R.E., 2017. Un nouveau paradigme écologique pour une sociologie post-abondance, Questions de communication, 32, 2, 125-152, http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.11461. [Google Scholar]
- Cecchini A., Hainard F., 2012. Quelles méthodes pour analyser le développement durable de l’environnement construit ?, Zurich, Fonds national suisse, http://dx.doi.org/10.3218/3353-3. [Google Scholar]
- Claeys C., Giuliano J., Tepongning Megnifo H., Fissier L., Rouadjia A., Lizée C., Geneys C., Marçot N., 2017. Une analyse interdisciplinaire des vulnérabilités socioenvironnementales : le cas de falaises côtières urbanisées en Méditerranée, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 3, 241-254, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017053. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Darbellay F., Paulsen T., 2011. Au miroir des disciplines : réflexions sur les pratiques d’enseignement et de recherche inter- et transdisciplinaires, Berlin, Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
- Dixon-Fowler H.R., Slater D.J., Johnson J.L., Ellstrand A.E., Romi A.M., 2013. Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP-CFP relationship, Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 353-366, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8. [Google Scholar]
- Durance P. (Ed.), 2014. La prospective stratégique en action, Paris, Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
- Eisenhardt K.M., 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review, Academy of Management Review, 14, 1, 57-74. [Google Scholar]
- Faber M., Petersen T., Schiller J., 2002. Homo oeconomicus and homo politicus in Ecological Economics, Ecological Economics, 40, 3, 323-333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00279-8. [Google Scholar]
- Falque A., 2010. Pour un programme de recherches motivées en sciences sociales. Quel genre de recherches mener en sciences sociales pour contribuer à l’émergence d’un mode de développement durable ?, Communication au colloque Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (ISDA), 28 juin-1er juillet, Montpellier. [Google Scholar]
- Faron O., 2014. La prospective, une science neuve et utile !, in Durance P. (Ed.), La prospective stratégique en action, Paris, Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
- Fleetwood S., 2005. Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective, Organization, 12, 2, 197-222, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051188. [Google Scholar]
- Flipo F., 2017. Interdisciplinarité et transdisciplinarité à l’épreuve des revues anglophones, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 1, 48-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fourez G., 2002. Approches didactiques de l’interdisciplinarité, Bruxelles, De Boeck Université. [Google Scholar]
- Freeman R.E., 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston, Pitman. [Google Scholar]
- Fritzsche D., Oz E., 2007. Personal values’ influence on the ethical dimension of decision making, Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 335-343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9256-5. [Google Scholar]
- Frodeman R., 2014. Sustainable knowledge: a theory of interdisciplinarity, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Ghoshal S., 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 1, 75-91, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132558. [Google Scholar]
- Gladwin T.N., Kennelly J.J., Krause T.-S., 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research, Academy of Management Review, 20, 4, 878-907, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024. [Google Scholar]
- Godet M., 2014. Le plaisir de l’indiscipline intellectuelle pour construire l’avenir autrement, in Durance P. (Ed.), La prospective stratégique en action, Paris, Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
- Hahn T., Figge F., 2011. Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: toward an inclusive notion of profitability, Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 3, 325-345, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2277831. [Google Scholar]
- Handfield R.B., Melnyk S.A., Calantone R.J., Curkovic S., 2001. Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 2, 189-208, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.922478. [Google Scholar]
- Harris J.D., Freeman R.E., 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis: a response to Joakim Sandberg, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 4, 541-548, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818437. [Google Scholar]
- Hart S.L., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm, Academy of Management Review, 20, 4, 986-1014, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033. [Google Scholar]
- Hervé D., Rivière M., 2015. L’interdisciplinarité s’invite dans les systèmes complexes : les journées de Rochebrune, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 23, 1, 54-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015002. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman A.J., 1997. From heresy to dogma: an institutional history of corporate environmentalism, San Francisco, New Lexington Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hoffman W.M., 1986. What is necessary for corporate moral excellence?, Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 3, 233-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00383631. [Google Scholar]
- Illies J.J., Reiter-Palmon R., 2008. Responding destructively in leadership situations: the role of personal values and problem construction, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 1, 251-272, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9574-2. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson P., Duberley J., 2000. Understanding management research, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Kahn W.A., 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 4, 692-724, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/256287. [Google Scholar]
- Kieser A., Leiner L., 2009. Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable, Journal of Management Studies, 46, 3, 516-533, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Klein J.T., 1990. Interdisciplinarity. History, theory & practice, Detroit, Wayne State University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Korhonen J., von. Malmborg F., Strachan P.A., Ehrenfeld J.R., 2004. Management and policy aspects of industrial ecology: an emerging research agenda, Business Startegy and the Environment, 13, 5, 289-305, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.415. [Google Scholar]
- Kötter R., Balsiger P.W., 1999. Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity: a constant challenge to the sciences, Issues in Integrative Studies, 17, 87-119, http://hdl.handle.net/10323/4184. [Google Scholar]
- Lauriol J., 2004. Le développement durable à la recherche d’un corps de doctrine, Revue française de gestion, 30, 152, 137-150, http://dx.doi.org/10.3166/rfg.152.137-150. [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence R.J., 2015. Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes, Futures, 65, 1-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007. [Google Scholar]
- Lemay V., 2011. La propension à se soucier de l’Autre : promouvoir l’interdisciplinarité comme identité savante nouvelle, complémentaire et utile, in Darbellay F., Paulsen T. (Eds), Au miroir des disciplines : réflexions sur les pratiques d’enseignement et de recherche inter- et transdisciplinaires, Berlin, Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
- Lépineux F., Rosé J.-J., Bonanni C.A.D., Hudson S., 2016 [1re éd. 2010]. La RSE. La responsabilité sociale des entreprises : théories et pratiques, Paris, Dunod. [Google Scholar]
- Levillain K., Segrestin B., Hatchuel A., 2014. Repenser les finalités de l’entreprise. La contribution des sciences de gestion dans un monde post-hégélien, Revue française de gestion, 40, 8, 179-200, www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-gestion-2014-8-page-179.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez F., 2019. On the role of faith in sustainability management: a conceptual model and research agenda, Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 787-807, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez F., O’Sullivan P., Smith M., Esposito M., 2017. Perspectives on the role of business in social innovation, Journal of Management Development, 36, 5, 681-695, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2016-0212. [Google Scholar]
- Michel-Guillou É., 2017. Le rôle de l’incertitude dans la construction sociale des problématiques environnementales, Bulletin de psychologie, 548, 83-86, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.548.0083. [Google Scholar]
- Miller D.W., Ngunjiri F.W., Fernandez D.A., 2013. Leadership vews on corporate chaplains: business, socio-cultural, and spiritual justifications, Academy of Management Proceedings, 14864, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2013.14864abstract. [Google Scholar]
- Morales M., 2019. La loi PACTE et la prise en compte des considérations sociales et environnementales en droit des sociétés : une réforme en trompe l’œil ?, Revue juridique de l’environnement, 44, 2, 339-351, www.cairn.info/revue-revue-juridique-de-l-environnement-2019-2-page-339.htm. [Google Scholar]
- O’Campo P., Kirst M., Schaefer-McDaniel N., Hwang S., 2011. Introducing a transdisciplinary approach to applied urban health research, in Kirst M., Schaefer-McDaniel N., Hwang S., O’Campo P. (Eds), Converging disciplines: a transdisciplinary research approach to urban health problems, 3-11, New York, Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Osborne P., 2015. Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics, Theory, Culture & Society, 32, 5-6, 3-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276415592245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Patel T., 2016. Multiparadigmatic studies of culture: needs, challenges, and recommendations for management scholars, European Management Review, 14, 1, 83-100, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emre.12089. [Google Scholar]
- Patomäki H., Wight C., 2000. After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism, International Studies Quarterly, 44, 2, 213-237, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00156. [Google Scholar]
- Petrişor A.-I., 2013. Multi-, trans- and inter- disciplinarity, essential conditions for the sustainable development of human habitat, Urbanism. Arhitectură, Construcţii, 4, 2, 43-50. [Google Scholar]
- Pivot A., Leroy P., 2001. La transdisciplinarité : un mythe ou une réalité ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 9, 1, 66-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1240-1307(01)90013-5. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Porter M.E., van der Linde C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 4, 97-118. [Google Scholar]
- Rafols I., Leydesdorff L., O’Hare A., Nightingale P., Stirling A., 2012. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research. A comparison between innovation studies and business & management, Research Policy, 41, 7, 1262-1282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015. [Google Scholar]
- Resweber J.-P., 1981. La méthode interdisciplinaire, Paris, Presses universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
- Resweber J. −P., 2000. Le pari de la transdisciplinarité. Vers l’intégration des savoirs, Paris, L’Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
- Riaux J., Massuel S., Venot J.-P., 2017. Retour réflexif sur une expérience interdisciplinaire exploratoire : l’atelier « Interdisciplinarité autour des petits barrages », Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 2, 163-171, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017026. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Riedy C., 2016. Seeding a new transdisciplinary community of practice, in Fam D., Palmer, J., Riedy C., Mitchell C. (Eds), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Riot J., 2017 [1re éd. 2014]. Construire l’innovation durable : les instruments de la gestion environnementale, Paris, Presses des mines. [Google Scholar]
- Ripple W.J., Wolf C., Newsome T.M., Galetti M., Alamgir M., Crist E., Mahmoud M.I., Laurance W.F., 2017. World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice, BioScience, 67, 12, 1026-1028, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125. [Google Scholar]
- Roome N., 2012. Looking back, thinking forward: distinguishing between weak and strong sustainability, in Bansal P., Hoffman A.J. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 620-629. [Google Scholar]
- Sandberg J., 2008. Understanding the separation thesis, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 2, 213-232, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818216. [Google Scholar]
- Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (Eds), 2017. Managing the business case for sustainability: the integration of social, environmental and economic performance, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Schmid A.-F., 2018. Les régimes génériques de l’enseignement, Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia, 11, 2, 1-13, http://dx.doi.org/10.3895/rbect.v11n2.8415. [Google Scholar]
- Schwarz N., 2000. Emotion, cognition, and decision making, Cognition and Emotion, 14, 4, 433-440, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026999300402745. [Google Scholar]
- Segrestin B., Levillain K., Hatchuel A., 2016. Purpose-driven corporations: how corporate law reorders the field of corporate governance. Communication au colloque European Academy of Management Conference (EURAM 2016), June, Paris. [Google Scholar]
- Smith A., 2002 [1st ed. 1759]. The theory of moral sentiments, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Suddaby R., Elsbach K.D., Greenwood R., Meyer J.W., Zilber T.B., 2010. Organizations and their institutional environments – Bringing meaning, values, and culture back in: Introduction to the special research forum, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 6, 1234-1240, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57317486. [Google Scholar]
- Tremblay S., D’Almeida N., Libaert T. (Eds), 2018. Développement durable : une communication qui se démarque, Québec, Presses de l’Université du Québec. [Google Scholar]
- Treviño L.K., Hartman L.P., Brown M., 2000. Moral person and moral manager: how executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership, California Management Review, 42, 4, 128-142, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166057. [Google Scholar]
- Valente M., 2010. Demystifying the struggles of private sector paradigmatic change: business as an agent in a complex adaptive system, Business & Society, 49, 3, 439-476, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650310369376. [Google Scholar]
- Weingart P., 2001. Die stunde der wahrheit? Zum verhältnis der wissenschaft zu politik, wirtschaft und medien in der wissensgesellschaft, Weilerswist, Velbrück. [Google Scholar]
- Weiss C.H., 1979. The many meanings of research utilization, Public Administration Review, 39, 5, 426-431. [Google Scholar]
- Zaccaï E., 2007. Développement durable et disciplines scientifiques, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 15, 4, 379-388, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.