Vers un management durable ? État des lieux et perspective « supradisciplinaire »

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 28, Number 3-4, Juillet/Décembre 2020


Page(s)		248 - 259
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021009
Published online		05 April 2021

Balsiger P.W., 2004. Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale, Futures, 36, 4, 407-421, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.002. [Google Scholar]
Barataud F., Hellec F., Levain A., Petit S., 2018. Quand les recherches en sciences sociales s’invitent dans la gestion de l’eau, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 26, 4, 395-406, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018054. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Barré R., 2008. La « recherche prospective environnementale » : une ambition pour la politique de recherche, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16, 1, 57-59, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008025. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bellemare G., Tremblay D., 2007. Le défi de l’interdisciplinarité : ce que les « sciences sociales appliquées » peuvent apprendre des « sciences sociales fondamentales », Études théoriques, https://crises.uqam.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/ET0707.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Benyus J.M., 1997. Biomimicry: innovation inspired by nature, New York, William Morrow. [Google Scholar]
Berns M., Townend A., Khayat Z., Balagopal B., Reeves M., Hopkins M.S., Kruschwitz N., 2009. Sustainability and competitive advantage, MIT Sloan Management Review, 51, 1, 19-26, https://image-src.bcg.com/Images/MIT_Sustainability_tcm56-125057.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Berthet E.T., Segrestin B., Weil B., 2018. Des biens communs aux inconnus communs : initier un processus collectif de conception pour la gestion durable d’un agro-écosystème, Revue de l’organisation responsable, 13, 1, 7-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/ror.131.0007. [Google Scholar]
Billaud J.-P., Aubertin C., Hubert B., 2015. Revisiter notre projet éditorial, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 23, 1, 1-2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bocken N.M.P., Short S.W., Rana P., Evans S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes, Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039. [Google Scholar]
Boudens C.J., 2005. The story of work: a narrative analysis of workplace emotion, Organization Studies, 26, 9, 1285-1306, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840605055264. [Google Scholar]
Bromham L., Dinnage R., Hua X., 2016. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success, Nature, 534, 684-687, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature18315. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bruun H., Hukkinen J., Huutoniemi K., Thompson Klein J., 2005. Promoting interdisciplinary research: the case of the Academy of Finland, Helsinki, Academy of Finland. [Google Scholar]
Burt R.S., 1995. Le capital social, les trous structuraux et l’entrepreneur, Revue française de sociologie, 36, 4, 599-628, www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1995_num_36_4_4421. [Google Scholar]
Catton Jr. W.R., Dunlap R.E., 2017. ‪Un nouveau paradigme écologique pour une sociologie post-abondance‪, Questions de communication, 32, 2, 125-152, http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/questionsdecommunication.11461. [Google Scholar]
Cecchini A., Hainard F., 2012. Quelles méthodes pour analyser le développement durable de l’environnement construit ?, Zurich, Fonds national suisse, http://dx.doi.org/10.3218/3353-3. [Google Scholar]
Claeys C., Giuliano J., Tepongning Megnifo H., Fissier L., Rouadjia A., Lizée C., Geneys C., Marçot N., 2017. Une analyse interdisciplinaire des vulnérabilités socioenvironnementales : le cas de falaises côtières urbanisées en Méditerranée, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 3, 241-254, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017053. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Darbellay F., Paulsen T., 2011. Au miroir des disciplines : réflexions sur les pratiques d’enseignement et de recherche inter- et transdisciplinaires, Berlin, Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
Dixon-Fowler H.R., Slater D.J., Johnson J.L., Ellstrand A.E., Romi A.M., 2013. Beyond “does it pay to be green?” A meta-analysis of moderators of the CEP-CFP relationship, Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 353-366, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8. [Google Scholar]
Durance P. (Ed.), 2014. La prospective stratégique en action, Paris, Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
Eisenhardt K.M., 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review, Academy of Management Review, 14, 1, 57-74. [Google Scholar]
Faber M., Petersen T., Schiller J., 2002. Homo oeconomicus and homo politicus in Ecological Economics, Ecological Economics, 40, 3, 323-333, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00279-8. [Google Scholar]
Falque A., 2010. Pour un programme de recherches motivées en sciences sociales. Quel genre de recherches mener en sciences sociales pour contribuer à l’émergence d’un mode de développement durable ?, Communication au colloque Innovation and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (ISDA), 28 juin-1^er juillet, Montpellier. [Google Scholar]
Faron O., 2014. La prospective, une science neuve et utile !, in Durance P. (Ed.), La prospective stratégique en action, Paris, Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
Fleetwood S., 2005. Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective, Organization, 12, 2, 197-222, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508405051188. [Google Scholar]
Flipo F., 2017. Interdisciplinarité et transdisciplinarité à l’épreuve des revues anglophones, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 1, 48-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Fourez G., 2002. Approches didactiques de l’interdisciplinarité, Bruxelles, De Boeck Université. [Google Scholar]
Freeman R.E., 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston, Pitman. [Google Scholar]
Fritzsche D., Oz E., 2007. Personal values’ influence on the ethical dimension of decision making, Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 335-343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9256-5. [Google Scholar]
Frodeman R., 2014. Sustainable knowledge: a theory of interdisciplinarity, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
Ghoshal S., 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 1, 75-91, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132558. [Google Scholar]
Gladwin T.N., Kennelly J.J., Krause T.-S., 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research, Academy of Management Review, 20, 4, 878-907, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280024. [Google Scholar]
Godet M., 2014. Le plaisir de l’indiscipline intellectuelle pour construire l’avenir autrement, in Durance P. (Ed.), La prospective stratégique en action, Paris, Odile Jacob. [Google Scholar]
Hahn T., Figge F., 2011. Beyond the bounded instrumentality in current corporate sustainability research: toward an inclusive notion of profitability, Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 3, 325-345, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2277831. [Google Scholar]
Handfield R.B., Melnyk S.A., Calantone R.J., Curkovic S., 2001. Integrating environmental concerns into the design process: the gap between theory and practice, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 2, 189-208, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/17.922478. [Google Scholar]
Harris J.D., Freeman R.E., 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis: a response to Joakim Sandberg, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 4, 541-548, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818437. [Google Scholar]
Hart S.L., 1995. A natural-resource-based view of the firm, Academy of Management Review, 20, 4, 986-1014, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512280033. [Google Scholar]
Hervé D., Rivière M., 2015. L’interdisciplinarité s’invite dans les systèmes complexes : les journées de Rochebrune, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 23, 1, 54-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015002. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Hoffman A.J., 1997. From heresy to dogma: an institutional history of corporate environmentalism, San Francisco, New Lexington Press. [Google Scholar]
Hoffman W.M., 1986. What is necessary for corporate moral excellence?, Journal of Business Ethics, 5, 3, 233-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00383631. [Google Scholar]
Illies J.J., Reiter-Palmon R., 2008. Responding destructively in leadership situations: the role of personal values and problem construction, Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 1, 251-272, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9574-2. [Google Scholar]
Johnson P., Duberley J., 2000. Understanding management research, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
Kahn W.A., 1990. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33, 4, 692-724, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/256287. [Google Scholar]
Kieser A., Leiner L., 2009. Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable, Journal of Management Studies, 46, 3, 516-533, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Klein J.T., 1990. Interdisciplinarity. History, theory & practice, Detroit, Wayne State University Press. [Google Scholar]
Korhonen J., von. Malmborg F., Strachan P.A., Ehrenfeld J.R., 2004. Management and policy aspects of industrial ecology: an emerging research agenda, Business Startegy and the Environment, 13, 5, 289-305, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bse.415. [Google Scholar]
Kötter R., Balsiger P.W., 1999. Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity: a constant challenge to the sciences, Issues in Integrative Studies, 17, 87-119, http://hdl.handle.net/10323/4184. [Google Scholar]
Lauriol J., 2004. Le développement durable à la recherche d’un corps de doctrine, Revue française de gestion, 30, 152, 137-150, http://dx.doi.org/10.3166/rfg.152.137-150. [Google Scholar]
Lawrence R.J., 2015. Advances in transdisciplinarity: epistemologies, methodologies and processes, Futures, 65, 1-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007. [Google Scholar]
Lemay V., 2011. La propension à se soucier de l’Autre : promouvoir l’interdisciplinarité comme identité savante nouvelle, complémentaire et utile, in Darbellay F., Paulsen T. (Eds), Au miroir des disciplines : réflexions sur les pratiques d’enseignement et de recherche inter- et transdisciplinaires, Berlin, Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
Lépineux F., Rosé J.-J., Bonanni C.A.D., Hudson S., 2016 [1^re éd. 2010]. La RSE. La responsabilité sociale des entreprises : théories et pratiques, Paris, Dunod. [Google Scholar]
Levillain K., Segrestin B., Hatchuel A., 2014. Repenser les finalités de l’entreprise. La contribution des sciences de gestion dans un monde post-hégélien, Revue française de gestion, 40, 8, 179-200, www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-gestion-2014-8-page-179.htm. [Google Scholar]
Martinez F., 2019. On the role of faith in sustainability management: a conceptual model and research agenda, Journal of Business Ethics, 155, 787-807, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3540-4. [Google Scholar]
Martinez F., O’Sullivan P., Smith M., Esposito M., 2017. Perspectives on the role of business in social innovation, Journal of Management Development, 36, 5, 681-695, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2016-0212. [Google Scholar]
Michel-Guillou É., 2017. Le rôle de l’incertitude dans la construction sociale des problématiques environnementales, Bulletin de psychologie, 548, 83-86, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/bupsy.548.0083. [Google Scholar]
Miller D.W., Ngunjiri F.W., Fernandez D.A., 2013. Leadership vews on corporate chaplains: business, socio-cultural, and spiritual justifications, Academy of Management Proceedings, 14864, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2013.14864abstract. [Google Scholar]
Morales M., 2019. La loi PACTE et la prise en compte des considérations sociales et environnementales en droit des sociétés : une réforme en trompe l’œil ?, Revue juridique de l’environnement, 44, 2, 339-351, www.cairn.info/revue-revue-juridique-de-l-environnement-2019-2-page-339.htm. [Google Scholar]
O’Campo P., Kirst M., Schaefer-McDaniel N., Hwang S., 2011. Introducing a transdisciplinary approach to applied urban health research, in Kirst M., Schaefer-McDaniel N., Hwang S., O’Campo P. (Eds), Converging disciplines: a transdisciplinary research approach to urban health problems, 3-11, New York, Springer. [Google Scholar]
Osborne P., 2015. Problematizing disciplinarity, transdisciplinary problematics, Theory, Culture & Society, 32, 5-6, 3-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276415592245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Patel T., 2016. Multiparadigmatic studies of culture: needs, challenges, and recommendations for management scholars, European Management Review, 14, 1, 83-100, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/emre.12089. [Google Scholar]
Patomäki H., Wight C., 2000. After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism, International Studies Quarterly, 44, 2, 213-237, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00156. [Google Scholar]
Petrişor A.-I., 2013. Multi-, trans- and inter- disciplinarity, essential conditions for the sustainable development of human habitat, Urbanism. Arhitectură, Construcţii, 4, 2, 43-50. [Google Scholar]
Pivot A., Leroy P., 2001. La transdisciplinarité : un mythe ou une réalité ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 9, 1, 66-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1240-1307(01)90013-5. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Porter M.E., van der Linde C., 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 4, 97-118. [Google Scholar]
Rafols I., Leydesdorff L., O’Hare A., Nightingale P., Stirling A., 2012. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research. A comparison between innovation studies and business & management, Research Policy, 41, 7, 1262-1282, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015. [Google Scholar]
Resweber J.-P., 1981. La méthode interdisciplinaire, Paris, Presses universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
Resweber J. −P., 2000. Le pari de la transdisciplinarité. Vers l’intégration des savoirs, Paris, L’Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
Riaux J., Massuel S., Venot J.-P., 2017. Retour réflexif sur une expérience interdisciplinaire exploratoire : l’atelier « Interdisciplinarité autour des petits barrages », Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 2, 163-171, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss/2017026. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Riedy C., 2016. Seeding a new transdisciplinary community of practice, in Fam D., Palmer, J., Riedy C., Mitchell C. (Eds), Transdisciplinary research and practice for sustainability outcomes, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Riot J., 2017 [1^re éd. 2014]. Construire l’innovation durable : les instruments de la gestion environnementale, Paris, Presses des mines. [Google Scholar]
Ripple W.J., Wolf C., Newsome T.M., Galetti M., Alamgir M., Crist E., Mahmoud M.I., Laurance W.F., 2017. World scientists’ warning to humanity: a second notice, BioScience, 67, 12, 1026-1028, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125. [Google Scholar]
Roome N., 2012. Looking back, thinking forward: distinguishing between weak and strong sustainability, in Bansal P., Hoffman A.J. (Eds), The Oxford handbook of business and the natural environment, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 620-629. [Google Scholar]
Sandberg J., 2008. Understanding the separation thesis, Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 2, 213-232, http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200818216. [Google Scholar]
Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (Eds), 2017. Managing the business case for sustainability: the integration of social, environmental and economic performance, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Schmid A.-F., 2018. Les régimes génériques de l’enseignement, Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Ciência e Tecnologia, 11, 2, 1-13, http://dx.doi.org/10.3895/rbect.v11n2.8415. [Google Scholar]
Schwarz N., 2000. Emotion, cognition, and decision making, Cognition and Emotion, 14, 4, 433-440, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/026999300402745. [Google Scholar]
Segrestin B., Levillain K., Hatchuel A., 2016. Purpose-driven corporations: how corporate law reorders the field of corporate governance. Communication au colloque European Academy of Management Conference (EURAM 2016), June, Paris. [Google Scholar]
Smith A., 2002 [1^st ed. 1759]. The theory of moral sentiments, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Suddaby R., Elsbach K.D., Greenwood R., Meyer J.W., Zilber T.B., 2010. Organizations and their institutional environments – Bringing meaning, values, and culture back in: Introduction to the special research forum, Academy of Management Journal, 53, 6, 1234-1240, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57317486. [Google Scholar]
Tremblay S., D’Almeida N., Libaert T. (Eds), 2018. Développement durable : une communication qui se démarque, Québec, Presses de l’Université du Québec. [Google Scholar]
Treviño L.K., Hartman L.P., Brown M., 2000. Moral person and moral manager: how executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership, California Management Review, 42, 4, 128-142, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41166057. [Google Scholar]
Valente M., 2010. Demystifying the struggles of private sector paradigmatic change: business as an agent in a complex adaptive system, Business & Society, 49, 3, 439-476, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650310369376. [Google Scholar]
Weingart P., 2001. Die stunde der wahrheit? Zum verhältnis der wissenschaft zu politik, wirtschaft und medien in der wissensgesellschaft, Weilerswist, Velbrück. [Google Scholar]
Weiss C.H., 1979. The many meanings of research utilization, Public Administration Review, 39, 5, 426-431. [Google Scholar]
Zaccaï E., 2007. Développement durable et disciplines scientifiques, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 15, 4, 379-388, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.