Open Access
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 30, Numéro 2, Avril/Juin 2022
Dossier : « Patrimoines, savoirs, pouvoirs »
Page(s) 144 - 156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2022036
Publié en ligne 19 décembre 2022
  • Abram S., 2017. Contradiction in contemporary political life: meeting bureaucracy in Norwegian municipal government, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 27-44, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Adams W.M., 2017. Conservation from above: globalising care for nature, in Brightman M., Lewis J. (Eds), The anthropology of sustainability. Beyond development and progress, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 111-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Adams W.M., Hulme D., 2001. If community conservation is the answer, what is the question?, Oryx, 35, 3, 193-200, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00183.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APN (Administración de Parques Nacionales), 1998. Las áreas naturales protegidas de la Argentina, APN. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown H.A., Reed A., Yarrow T., 2017. Introduction: towards an ethnography of meeting, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 10-26, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell L.M., Vainio-Mattila A., 2003. Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned?, Human Ecology, 31, 3, 417-437, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025071822388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carrier J.G., 1998. Introduction, in Carrier J.G., Miller D. (Eds), Virtualism: a new political economy, Oxford (UK)/New York, Berg, 1-24. [Google Scholar]
  • Certeau M. de, 1984 [1re éd. 1980]. L’invention du quotidien, I : Arts de faire, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers R., 1997. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last, London, Intermediate Technology. [Google Scholar]
  • Choy T.K., 2005. Articulated knowledges: environmental forms after universality’s demise, American Anthropologist, 107, 1, 5-18, https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.1.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciocco N.F., 1995. La marisquería mediante buceo en el golfo San José (Chubut, Argentina). Plan de manejo integrado de la zona costera patagónica, Informe Técnico 2, Rapport, PNUD-GEF. [Google Scholar]
  • Cleaver F., 2001. Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development, in Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books, 36-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), 2001. Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Corsín Jiménez A., Estalella A., 2017. Political exhaustion and the experiment of street: Boyle meets Hobbes in Occupy Madrid, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 110-123, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demeulenaere E., 2013. Les semences entre critique et expérience : les ressorts pratiques d’une contestation paysanne, Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement, 94, 4, 421-441, www.persee.fr/doc/reae_1966-9607_2013_num_94_4_2110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drijver C., 1992. People’s participation in environmental projects, in Croll E.J., Parkin D. (Eds), Bush base: forest farm. Culture, environment and development, London/New York, Routledge, 131-145. [Google Scholar]
  • Fiorino D.J., 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms, Science, Technology & Human Values, 15, 2, 226-243, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016224399001500204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foucault M., 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, New York, Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Gatt C., Ingold T., 2013. From description to correspondence: anthropology in real time, in Gunn W., Otto T., Smith R.C. (Eds), Design anthropology: theory and practice, London, Bloomsbury, 139-158. [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez Otero J., Lanata J.L., Prieto A., 1998. Arqueología de la costa atlántica patagónica, Revista de Arqueología Americana, 15, 107-185. [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez Otero J., 2006. Arqueología de la costa centro-septentrional de Patagonia Argentina, in Cruz I., Caracotche M.S. (Eds), Arqueología de la costa patagónica: pe rspectivas para la conservación, Río Gallegos, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral, 73-82. [Google Scholar]
  • Ingold T., 2014. That’s enough about ethnography!, Hau: Journal of Ethnographic theory, 4, 1, 383-395, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leader-Williams N., Dublin H., 2000. Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’, in Entwistle A., Dunstone N. (Eds), Priorities for the conservation of mammalian diversity: has the panda had its day?, Cambridge (UK)/New York, Cambridge University Press, 53-81. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorimer J., 2007. Nonhuman charisma, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 5, 911-932, https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fd71j. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marin F., Cinti A., Dell’Arciprete O.P., Carreño G.E., De Francesco E.A., 2017. Playas y bajadas usadas por los rederos de costa de la zona 1 de pesca artesanal, Provincia de Chubut: una colaboración entre científicos y pescadores. Rapport technique, Puerto Madryn, CESIMAR-CONICET. [Google Scholar]
  • Marin F., 2022. Climate change, weather and perception: fishing in the Eastern Patagonia, in Sillitoe P. (Ed.), The anthroposcene of weather and climate. Ethnographic contributions to the climate change debate, New York/Oxford, Berghahn, 95-126. [Google Scholar]
  • Medeiros C., 2001. Civilizing the popular? The law of popular participation and the design of a new civil society in 1990s Bolivia, Critique of Anthropology, 21, 4, 401-425, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x0102100404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mosse D., 2001. “People’s knowledge”, participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development, in Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books, 16-35. [Google Scholar]
  • Nadasdy P., 2005. The anti-politics of TEK: the institutionalization of co-management discourse and practice, Anthropologica, 47, 2, 215-232. [Google Scholar]
  • Peace A., 1993. Environmental protest, bureaucratic closure: the politics of discourse in rural Ireland, in Milton K. (Ed.), Environmentalism: the view from anthropology, London/New York, Routledge, 188-204. [Google Scholar]
  • Provincia de Chubut, 2001. Plan de manejo del área natural protegida sistema península Valdés (ANPPV), version de présentation, https://peninsulavaldes.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/1-Introducci%C3%B3n.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahnema M., 1992. Participation, in Sachs W. (Ed.), The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power, London/New York, Zed Books, 116-131. [Google Scholar]
  • Reed M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review, Biological Conservation, 141, 10, 2417-2431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roué M., 2012. Histoire et épistémologie des savoirs locaux et autochtones. De la tradition à la mode, Revue d’ethnoécologie, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/ethnoecologie.813. [Google Scholar]
  • Santos B.D.S., 1998. Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy, Politics & Society, 26, 4, 461-510, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329298026004003. [Google Scholar]
  • Shore C., Wright S., Però D. (Eds), 2011. Policy worlds. Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power, New York/Oxford, Berghahn. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor H., 2001. Insights into participation from critical management and labour process perspectives, in Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books, 122-138. [Google Scholar]
  • Tippett J., Handley J.F., Ravetz J., 2007. Meeting the challenges of sustainable development —A conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning, Progress in Planning, 67, 1, 9-98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.12.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walley C.J., 2004. Rough waters. Nature and development in an East African marine park, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber N., Christopherson T., 2002. The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process, Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 1, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00070-3. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Western D., Wright R.M., Strumm S.C. (Eds), 1994. Natural connections: perspectives in community-based conservation, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Yarrow T., 2017. Where knowledge meets: heritage expertise at the intersection of people, perspective, and place, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 95-109, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12596. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.