EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 30 / No 2 (Avril/Juin 2022) Nat. Sci. Soc., 30 2 (2022) 144-156 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 30, Number 2, Avril/Juin 2022
Dossier : « Patrimoines, savoirs, pouvoirs »
Page(s) 144 - 156
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2022036
Published online 19 December 2022
  • Abram S., 2017. Contradiction in contemporary political life: meeting bureaucracy in Norwegian municipal government, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 27-44, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12592. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Adams W.M., 2017. Conservation from above: globalising care for nature, in Brightman M., Lewis J. (Eds), The anthropology of sustainability. Beyond development and progress, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 111-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Adams W.M., Hulme D., 2001. If community conservation is the answer, what is the question?, Oryx, 35, 3, 193-200, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3008.2001.00183.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • APN (Administración de Parques Nacionales), 1998. Las áreas naturales protegidas de la Argentina, APN. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown H.A., Reed A., Yarrow T., 2017. Introduction: towards an ethnography of meeting, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 10-26, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell L.M., Vainio-Mattila A., 2003. Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned?, Human Ecology, 31, 3, 417-437, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025071822388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carrier J.G., 1998. Introduction, in Carrier J.G., Miller D. (Eds), Virtualism: a new political economy, Oxford (UK)/New York, Berg, 1-24. [Google Scholar]
  • Certeau M. de, 1984 [1re éd. 1980]. L’invention du quotidien, I : Arts de faire, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers R., 1997. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last, London, Intermediate Technology. [Google Scholar]
  • Choy T.K., 2005. Articulated knowledges: environmental forms after universality’s demise, American Anthropologist, 107, 1, 5-18, https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2005.107.1.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciocco N.F., 1995. La marisquería mediante buceo en el golfo San José (Chubut, Argentina). Plan de manejo integrado de la zona costera patagónica, Informe Técnico 2, Rapport, PNUD-GEF. [Google Scholar]
  • Cleaver F., 2001. Institutions, agency and the limitations of participatory approaches to development, in Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books, 36-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), 2001. Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Corsín Jiménez A., Estalella A., 2017. Political exhaustion and the experiment of street: Boyle meets Hobbes in Occupy Madrid, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 110-123, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12597. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demeulenaere E., 2013. Les semences entre critique et expérience : les ressorts pratiques d’une contestation paysanne, Revue d’études en Agriculture et Environnement, 94, 4, 421-441, www.persee.fr/doc/reae_1966-9607_2013_num_94_4_2110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drijver C., 1992. People’s participation in environmental projects, in Croll E.J., Parkin D. (Eds), Bush base: forest farm. Culture, environment and development, London/New York, Routledge, 131-145. [Google Scholar]
  • Fiorino D.J., 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms, Science, Technology & Human Values, 15, 2, 226-243, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016224399001500204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foucault M., 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, New York, Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Gatt C., Ingold T., 2013. From description to correspondence: anthropology in real time, in Gunn W., Otto T., Smith R.C. (Eds), Design anthropology: theory and practice, London, Bloomsbury, 139-158. [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez Otero J., Lanata J.L., Prieto A., 1998. Arqueología de la costa atlántica patagónica, Revista de Arqueología Americana, 15, 107-185. [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez Otero J., 2006. Arqueología de la costa centro-septentrional de Patagonia Argentina, in Cruz I., Caracotche M.S. (Eds), Arqueología de la costa patagónica: pe rspectivas para la conservación, Río Gallegos, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral, 73-82. [Google Scholar]
  • Ingold T., 2014. That’s enough about ethnography!, Hau: Journal of Ethnographic theory, 4, 1, 383-395, https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.021. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leader-Williams N., Dublin H., 2000. Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’, in Entwistle A., Dunstone N. (Eds), Priorities for the conservation of mammalian diversity: has the panda had its day?, Cambridge (UK)/New York, Cambridge University Press, 53-81. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorimer J., 2007. Nonhuman charisma, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25, 5, 911-932, https://doi.org/10.1068%2Fd71j. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marin F., Cinti A., Dell’Arciprete O.P., Carreño G.E., De Francesco E.A., 2017. Playas y bajadas usadas por los rederos de costa de la zona 1 de pesca artesanal, Provincia de Chubut: una colaboración entre científicos y pescadores. Rapport technique, Puerto Madryn, CESIMAR-CONICET. [Google Scholar]
  • Marin F., 2022. Climate change, weather and perception: fishing in the Eastern Patagonia, in Sillitoe P. (Ed.), The anthroposcene of weather and climate. Ethnographic contributions to the climate change debate, New York/Oxford, Berghahn, 95-126. [Google Scholar]
  • Medeiros C., 2001. Civilizing the popular? The law of popular participation and the design of a new civil society in 1990s Bolivia, Critique of Anthropology, 21, 4, 401-425, https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275x0102100404. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mosse D., 2001. “People’s knowledge”, participation and patronage: operations and representations in rural development, in Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books, 16-35. [Google Scholar]
  • Nadasdy P., 2005. The anti-politics of TEK: the institutionalization of co-management discourse and practice, Anthropologica, 47, 2, 215-232. [Google Scholar]
  • Peace A., 1993. Environmental protest, bureaucratic closure: the politics of discourse in rural Ireland, in Milton K. (Ed.), Environmentalism: the view from anthropology, London/New York, Routledge, 188-204. [Google Scholar]
  • Provincia de Chubut, 2001. Plan de manejo del área natural protegida sistema península Valdés (ANPPV), version de présentation, https://peninsulavaldes.org.ar/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/1-Introducci%C3%B3n.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahnema M., 1992. Participation, in Sachs W. (Ed.), The development dictionary: a guide to knowledge as power, London/New York, Zed Books, 116-131. [Google Scholar]
  • Reed M.S., 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review, Biological Conservation, 141, 10, 2417-2431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roué M., 2012. Histoire et épistémologie des savoirs locaux et autochtones. De la tradition à la mode, Revue d’ethnoécologie, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/ethnoecologie.813. [Google Scholar]
  • Santos B.D.S., 1998. Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a redistributive democracy, Politics & Society, 26, 4, 461-510, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329298026004003. [Google Scholar]
  • Shore C., Wright S., Però D. (Eds), 2011. Policy worlds. Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power, New York/Oxford, Berghahn. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor H., 2001. Insights into participation from critical management and labour process perspectives, in Cooke B., Kothari U. (Eds), Participation: the new tyranny?, London/New York, Zed Books, 122-138. [Google Scholar]
  • Tippett J., Handley J.F., Ravetz J., 2007. Meeting the challenges of sustainable development —A conceptual appraisal of a new methodology for participatory ecological planning, Progress in Planning, 67, 1, 9-98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2006.12.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walley C.J., 2004. Rough waters. Nature and development in an East African marine park, Princeton, Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber N., Christopherson T., 2002. The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process, Forest Policy and Economics, 4, 1, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00070-3. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Western D., Wright R.M., Strumm S.C. (Eds), 1994. Natural connections: perspectives in community-based conservation, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Yarrow T., 2017. Where knowledge meets: heritage expertise at the intersection of people, perspective, and place, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 23, S1, 95-109, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.12596. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.