Open Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 23, Numéro 2, avril-juin 2015
Dossier : « À propos des relations natures/sociétés »
Page(s) 157 - 165
Section Regards − Focus
Publié en ligne 8 juillet 2015
  • Aubréville, A., 1949. Climats, forêts et désertification de l’Afrique tropicale, Paris, Société d’édition de géographie maritime et coloniale. [Google Scholar]
  • Bakker, K., Bridge, G., 2006. Material worlds? Resource geographies and the matter of nature, Progress in Human Geography, 30, 1, 5-27. [Google Scholar]
  • Bassett, T.J., 1988. The political ecology of peasant-herder conflicts in the northern Ivory Coast, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 3, 433-472. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Behnke, R.H., Scoones, I., Kerven, C. (Eds), 1993. Range ecology at disequilibrium, London, Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernstein, H., 1978. Notes on capital and peasantry, Review of African Political Economy, 10, 6-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaikie, P., 1985. The political economy of soil erosion, London, Longman. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaikie, P., Brookfield, H., 1987. Land degradation and society, London, Metheun. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouleau, G., 2014. The co-production of science and waterscapes: the case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France, Geoforum, 57, 248-257. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyd, W., Prudham, W.S., Schurman, R.A., 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature, Society & Natural Resources, 14, 7, 555-570. [Google Scholar]
  • Braun, B., 2000. Producing vertical territory: geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada, Cultural Geographies, 7, 1, 7-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Castree, N., 2002. False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor‐networks, Antipode, 34, 1, 111-146. [Google Scholar]
  • Castree, N., 2014. Making sense of nature: representation, politics and democracy, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Chhatre, A., Saberwal, V., 2006. Democracy, development, and (re-)visions of nature: rural conflicts in the western Himalayas, Journal of Peasant Studies, 33, 4, 678-706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis, D., 2007. Resurrecting the granary of Rome. Environmental history and French colonial expansion in North Africa, Athens (OH), Ohio University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Fairhead, J., Leach, M., 1996. Misreading the African landscape: society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Foucault, M., 1980. Power/Knowledge, New York, Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2011. Politicizing environmental explanations: what can political ecology learn from sociology and philosophy of science? in Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P., Turner, M. (Eds), Knowing nature: conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 31-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., Walker, A,. 2008. Forest guardians and forest destroyers: the politics of environmental knowledge in northern Thailand, Seattle, University of Washington Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabbatin, B., Rossi, J., 2012. Political ecology: nonequilibrium science and nature-society research, Geography Compass, 6, 5, 275-289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hajer, M., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process, Oxford, Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), 2004. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirsch, S., Mitchell, D., 2004. The nature of things: dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism, Antipode, 36, 4, 687-705. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lave, R., 2011. Circulating knowledge, constructing expertise, in Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P., Turner, M. (Eds), Knowing nature: conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 263-279. [Google Scholar]
  • Lave, R., 2012. Bridging political ecology and STS: a field analysis of the Rosgen Wars. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 2, 366-382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Linton, J., Budds, J., 2014. The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water, Geoforum, 57, 170-180. [Google Scholar]
  • Perkins, H.A., 2007. Ecologies of actor-networks and (non) social labor within the urban political economies of nature, Geoforum, 38, 6, 1152-1162. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A. (Ed.), 1992. Science as practice and culture, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2010. The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribot, J., 2007. Institutional choice and recognition in the consolidation of local democracy, Democracy, 50, 1, 43-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Robbins, P., 2007. The lawn people: how grass, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are, Philadelphia, Temple University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Robbins, P., 2012. Political ecology: a critical introduction, Malden (MA), Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson, M.M., 2004. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance, Geoforum, 35, 3, 361-373. [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson, M.M., 2006. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services, Environment and Planning D, 24, 3, 367-387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson, M.M., 2010. Performing environmental governance, Geoforum, 41, 1, 7-10. [Google Scholar]
  • Scoones, I., 1995. Living with uncertainty: new directions in pastoral development in Africa, London, Intermediate Technology Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Scoones, I., 1999. New ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement? Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 479-507. [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 1999. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 3, 443-465. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: flows of power, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Traweek, S., 1988. Life times and beamtimes: the world of high energy physicists, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, M., 1993. Overstocking the range: a critical analysis of the environmental science of Sahelian pastoralism, Economic Geography, 69, 4, 402-421. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, M., 1999. Conflict, environmental change, and social institutions in dryland Africa: limitations of the community resource management approach, Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 12, 643-657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watts, M.J., 1983a. On the poverty of theory: natural hazards research in context, in Hewitt, K. (Ed.), Interpretations of calamity, London, Allen and Unwin, 231-262. [Google Scholar]
  • Watts, M.J., 1983b. Silent violence: food, famine and peasantry in northern Nigeria, Berkeley, University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmerer, K., 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 2, 356-369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.