Open Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 23, Number 2, avril-juin 2015
Dossier : « À propos des relations natures/sociétés »
Page(s) 157 - 165
Section Regards − Focus
Published online 08 July 2015
  • Aubréville, A., 1949. Climats, forêts et désertification de l’Afrique tropicale, Paris, Société d’édition de géographie maritime et coloniale. [Google Scholar]
  • Bakker, K., Bridge, G., 2006. Material worlds? Resource geographies and the matter of nature, Progress in Human Geography, 30, 1, 5-27. [Google Scholar]
  • Bassett, T.J., 1988. The political ecology of peasant-herder conflicts in the northern Ivory Coast, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 78, 3, 433-472. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Behnke, R.H., Scoones, I., Kerven, C. (Eds), 1993. Range ecology at disequilibrium, London, Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernstein, H., 1978. Notes on capital and peasantry, Review of African Political Economy, 10, 6-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaikie, P., 1985. The political economy of soil erosion, London, Longman. [Google Scholar]
  • Blaikie, P., Brookfield, H., 1987. Land degradation and society, London, Metheun. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouleau, G., 2014. The co-production of science and waterscapes: the case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France, Geoforum, 57, 248-257. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyd, W., Prudham, W.S., Schurman, R.A., 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature, Society & Natural Resources, 14, 7, 555-570. [Google Scholar]
  • Braun, B., 2000. Producing vertical territory: geology and governmentality in late Victorian Canada, Cultural Geographies, 7, 1, 7-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Castree, N., 2002. False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor‐networks, Antipode, 34, 1, 111-146. [Google Scholar]
  • Castree, N., 2014. Making sense of nature: representation, politics and democracy, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Chhatre, A., Saberwal, V., 2006. Democracy, development, and (re-)visions of nature: rural conflicts in the western Himalayas, Journal of Peasant Studies, 33, 4, 678-706. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davis, D., 2007. Resurrecting the granary of Rome. Environmental history and French colonial expansion in North Africa, Athens (OH), Ohio University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Fairhead, J., Leach, M., 1996. Misreading the African landscape: society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Foucault, M., 1980. Power/Knowledge, New York, Pantheon Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2011. Politicizing environmental explanations: what can political ecology learn from sociology and philosophy of science? in Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P., Turner, M. (Eds), Knowing nature: conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 31-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., Walker, A,. 2008. Forest guardians and forest destroyers: the politics of environmental knowledge in northern Thailand, Seattle, University of Washington Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Grabbatin, B., Rossi, J., 2012. Political ecology: nonequilibrium science and nature-society research, Geography Compass, 6, 5, 275-289. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hajer, M., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernization and the policy process, Oxford, Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff, S. (Ed.), 2004. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirsch, S., Mitchell, D., 2004. The nature of things: dead labor, nonhuman actors, and the persistence of Marxism, Antipode, 36, 4, 687-705. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lave, R., 2011. Circulating knowledge, constructing expertise, in Goldman, M., Nadasdy, P., Turner, M. (Eds), Knowing nature: conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 263-279. [Google Scholar]
  • Lave, R., 2012. Bridging political ecology and STS: a field analysis of the Rosgen Wars. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102, 2, 366-382. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Linton, J., Budds, J., 2014. The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water, Geoforum, 57, 170-180. [Google Scholar]
  • Perkins, H.A., 2007. Ecologies of actor-networks and (non) social labor within the urban political economies of nature, Geoforum, 38, 6, 1152-1162. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A. (Ed.), 1992. Science as practice and culture, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickering, A., 2010. The mangle of practice: time, agency, and science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ribot, J., 2007. Institutional choice and recognition in the consolidation of local democracy, Democracy, 50, 1, 43-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Robbins, P., 2007. The lawn people: how grass, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are, Philadelphia, Temple University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Robbins, P., 2012. Political ecology: a critical introduction, Malden (MA), Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson, M.M., 2004. The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation banking and problems in environmental governance, Geoforum, 35, 3, 361-373. [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson, M.M., 2006. The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services, Environment and Planning D, 24, 3, 367-387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson, M.M., 2010. Performing environmental governance, Geoforum, 41, 1, 7-10. [Google Scholar]
  • Scoones, I., 1995. Living with uncertainty: new directions in pastoral development in Africa, London, Intermediate Technology Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Scoones, I., 1999. New ecology and the social sciences: what prospects for a fruitful engagement? Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 479-507. [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 1999. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, 3, 443-465. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2004. Social power and the urbanization of water: flows of power, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Traweek, S., 1988. Life times and beamtimes: the world of high energy physicists, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, M., 1993. Overstocking the range: a critical analysis of the environmental science of Sahelian pastoralism, Economic Geography, 69, 4, 402-421. [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, M., 1999. Conflict, environmental change, and social institutions in dryland Africa: limitations of the community resource management approach, Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 12, 643-657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watts, M.J., 1983a. On the poverty of theory: natural hazards research in context, in Hewitt, K. (Ed.), Interpretations of calamity, London, Allen and Unwin, 231-262. [Google Scholar]
  • Watts, M.J., 1983b. Silent violence: food, famine and peasantry in northern Nigeria, Berkeley, University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Zimmerer, K., 2000. The reworking of conservation geographies: nonequilibrium landscapes and nature-society hybrids, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 2, 356-369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.