Les services écosystémiques culturels rendus par les zones humides protégées en Méditerranée : élaboration d’un indicateur de suivi

Open Access

Numéro		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 29, Numéro 4, Octobre/Décembre 2021


Page(s)		423 - 438
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2022007
Publié en ligne		20 mai 2022

Anougmar S., 2018. Opérationnalisation de l’indicateur de suivi des services culturels, récréatifs et éducatifs, des zones humides en Méditerranée : analyse des résultats sur 19 sites, Mémoire (Master of science) 104, Montpellier, CIHEAM-IAMM. [Google Scholar]
Beltrame C., Chazée L., Galewski T., Perennou C. (Eds), 2012. Les zones humides méditerranéennes, enjeux et perspectives : premier rapport technique, Arles, Observatoire des zones humides méditerranéennes, https://medwet.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/OZHM_2012_Rapport-technique.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Benayas J.M.R., Newton A.C., Diaz A., Bullock J.M., 2009. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis, Science, 325, 5944, 1121-1124, http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172460. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Brink P. ten (Ed.), 2011. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity in national and international policy making, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
Campagne C.S., Tschanz L., Tatoni T., 2016. Outil d’évaluation et de concertation sur les services écosystémiques : la matrice des capacités, Sciences Eaux & Territoires, article hors série 23, 1-6, https://doi.org/10.14758/SET-REVUE.2016.HS.01. [Google Scholar]
Chambers R., Conway G.R., 1991. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century, Institute of Development Studies Discussion Paper, 296, https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/775/Dp296.pdf?sequence=1. [Google Scholar]
Chazée L., Requier-Desjardins M., Khechimi W., 2016. Monitoring recreational and educational services provided by Mediterranean wetlands: how natural capital impact human and social capital?, in Vasiljevic D., Vujicic M., Lazic L., Stojanovic V. (Eds), The 8th conference on monitoring and management of visitors in recreational and protected areas: abstract book, Faculty of Sciences, Novi Sad (Serbie), September, 26-30, 49-52. [Google Scholar]
Chazée L., Requier-Desjardins M., Khechimi W., Najjar F.Z., Moisan D., Suc M., Bendjedda N., Benbelgacem W., Allouche Khebour F., Belarbi A., Khaloul F., Brahimi O., Maza S., Moussouni L., Amara M., Madjbar Y., Ait Iftene N., Khellouf L., Berkane S., Bakour S., 2017. Les services culturels récréatifs et éducatifs des zones humides en Méditerranée : des services sous-estimés malgré les avantages qu’ils procurent, résultats d’études en Méditerranée, Arles, Observatoire des zones humides méditérranéennes, www.pole-lagunes.org/ftp/LettreLagunes/2017/mars/Synthese_services_culturels_ZHMed2017_VF.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Chevassus-au-Louis B., Salles J.-M., Pujol J.-L., Bielsa S., Martin G., Richard D., 2009. Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes : contribution à la décision publique, Paris, La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
De Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L., 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, Ecological Complexity, 7, 3, 260-272, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Devaux J., Helier A., 2018. EFESE. Les milieux humides et aquatiques continentaux, Paris, ministère de la Transition écologique et solidaire, http://temis.documentation.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/docs/Temis/0087/Temis-0087242/23761.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Dubois J.-L., Mahieu F.-R., 2009. Sen, liberté et pratiques du développement, Revue Tiers Monde, 198, 2, 245-261, https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.198.0245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ekins P., Dresner S., Dahlström K., 2008. The four-capital method of sustainable development evaluation, European Environment, 18, 2, 63-80, https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.471. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Garrabé M., 2012. Modèle à capitaux multiples et analyse sociale du cycle de vie des capacités. Projet ANR -09-ALIA-004- FLONUDEP, Paris, Agence nationale de la recherche/ FranceAgriMer, www.michel-garrabe.com/pdf/modele_capitaux.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Garrabé M., Feschet P., 2013. A specific case: capacities social LCA, in Macombe C. (Ed.), Social LCAs. Socio-economic effects in value chains, Montpellier, CIRAD, 87-113. [Google Scholar]
Geijzendorffer I., Chazée L., Gaget E., Galewski T., Guelmami A., Perennou C., Davidson N., McInnes R., 2018. Mediterranean wetlands outlook 2: solutions for sustainable Mediterranean wetlands, Arles, Observatoire des zones humides méditerranéennes, https://medwet.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/MWO_2018_Technical-report.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Gómez-Baggethun E., De Groot R., Lomas P.L., Montes C., 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1209-1218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gómez-Baggethun E., Martín-López B., Barton D., Braat L., Saarikoski H., Kelemen M., García-Llorente M., van den Bergh E.J., Arias P., Berry P., 2014. State-of-the-art report on integrated valuation of ecosystem services. Collaborative project, European Commission FP7, www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/Deliverable%204%201_Integrated-Valuation-Of-Ecosystem-Services.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Haines-Young R., Potschin M., 2018. Common international classification of ecosystem services (cices) v5.1. Guidance on the application of the revised structure, EEA Framework Contract, European Environment Agency, https://cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2018/01/Guidance-V51-01012018.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Healy T., Côté S., 2001. The well-being of nations: the role of human and social capital, Paris, OECD, www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264189515-en.pdf?expires=1641914497&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=2FA089859DCCC0FA78AADC6A81485018. [Google Scholar]
Hernández-Morcillo M., Plieninger T., Bieling C., 2013. An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators, Ecological Indicators, 29, 434-444, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Islam M., Yamaguchi R., Sugiawan Y., Managi S., 2019. Valuing natural capital and ecosystem services: a literature review, Sustainability Science, 14, 159-174, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0597-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jacobs S., Dendoncker N., Martín-López B., Barton D.N., Gomez-Baggethun E., Boeraeve F., McGrath F.L., Vierikko K., Geneletti D., Sevecke K.J., Pipart N., Primmer E., Mederly P., Schmidt S., Aragão A., Baral H., Bark R.H., Briceno T., Brogna D., Cabral P., De Vreese R., Liquete C., Mueller H., Peh K.S.H., Phelan A., Rincón A.R., Rogers S.H., Turkelboom F., Van Reeth W., Van Zanten B.T., Wam H.K., Washbourne C.-L., 2016. A new valuation school: integrating diverse values of nature in resource and land use decisions, Ecosystem Services, 22, Part B, 213-220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kelemen E., García-Llorente M., Pataki G., Martín-López B., Gómez-Baggethun E., 2014. Non-monetary techniques for the valuation of ecosystem services, in Potschin M., Jax K. (Eds), OpenNESS Ecosystem services Reference Book, www.openness-project.eu/sites/default/files/SP-Non-monetary-valuation.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Khechimi W., 2015. La perception des services récréatifs et éducatifs des zones humides méditerranéennes : synthèse des neufs études de terrain réalisées entre 2012 et 2014. Mémoire (Master 2 I3P) 155, Montpellier, CIHEAM-IAMM. [Google Scholar]
Kumar M., Kumar P., 2008. Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective, Ecological Economics, 64, 4, 808-819, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
La Rosa D., Spyra M., Inostroza L., 2016. Indicators of cultural ecosystem services for urban planning: a review, Ecological Indicators, 61, Part 1, 74-89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lavorel S., Grigulis K., Lamarque P., Colace M.-P., Garden D., Girel J., Pellet G., Douzet R., 2011. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services, Journal of Ecology, 99, 1, 135-147, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01753.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lele S., Springate-Baginski O., Lakerveld R., Deb D., Dash P., 2013. Ecosystem services: origins, contributions, pitfalls, and alternatives, Conservation and Society, 11, 4, 343-358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Milcu A.I., Hanspach J., Abson D., Fischer J., 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research, Ecology and Society, 18, 3, http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05790-180344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2003a. Ecosystems and their services, in Leemans R., De Groot R.S. (Eds), Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment, Washington, World Resources Institute, 49-62, www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.300.aspx.pdf. [Google Scholar]
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2003b. Introduction and conceptual framework, in Leemans R., De Groot R.S. (Eds), Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment, Washington (DC), World Resources Institute, www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.299.aspx.pdf. [Google Scholar]
MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: wetlands and water. Synthesis, Washington (DC), World Resources Institute, www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.358.aspx.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Muradian R., Pascual U., 2018. A typology of elementary forms of human-nature relations: a contribution to the valuation debate, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 8-14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Perennou C., Beltrame C., Guelmami A., Tomas Vives P., Caessteker P., 2012. Existing areas and past changes of wetland extent in the Mediterranean region: an overview, Ecologia Mediterranea, 38, 2, 53-66, https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2012.1316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Puydarrieux P., Kervinio Y., Darses O., 2016. EFESE. Rapport intermédiaire, Paris, ministère de la Transition écologique, www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/Th%C3%A9ma%20-%20Efese%20-%20Rapport%20interm%C3%A9diaire.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Ramsar, 2010. Le plan stratégique Ramsar 2009-2015, Gland (Suisse), Secrétariat de la convention de Ramsar, www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/hbk4-21fr.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Ramsar, 2012. Resolution XI.13. An integrated framework for linking wetland conservation and wise use with poverty eradication, in 11th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), ‘Wetlands: home and destination’, Bucharest (Roumanie), 6-13 July, Gland (Suisse), Ramsar convention Bureau, www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/guide/guide-poverty-e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Ramsar, 2016. 4e Plan stratégique 2016-2021. La Convention relative aux zones humides d’importance internationale, particulièrement comme habitats des oiseaux d’eau − la « Convention de Ramsar », Gland (Suisse), Sécrétariat de la convention de Ramsar, www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/fr-sc48-19_annexe1_plan_strategique.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Rivière-Honegger A., Cottet M., Morandi B. (Eds), 2015. Connaître les perceptions et les représentations : quels apports pour la gestion des milieux aquatiques ?, Paris, ONEMA, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01248761/document. [Google Scholar]
Russi D., Brink ten P., Farmer A., Badura T., Coates D., Förster J., Kumar R., Davidson N., 2013. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for water and wetlands, London/Brussels, IEEP, Gland, Ramsar, http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TEEB_WaterWetlands_Report_2013.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Satz D., Gould R.K., Chan K.M.A., Guerry A., Norton B., Satterfield T., Halpern B.S., Levine J., Woodside U., Hannahs N., Basurto X., Klain S., 2013. The challenges of incorporating cultural ecosystem services into environmental assessment, Ambio, 42, 675-684, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0386-6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Scoones I., 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis, IDS Working Paper, 72, https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/3390/Wp72.pdf?sequence=1. [Google Scholar]
Sen A., 1981. Ingredients of famine analysis: availability and entitlements, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96, 3, 433-464, https://doi.org/10.2307/1882681. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ward Thompson C., 2011. Linking landscape and health: the recurring theme, Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, 3-4, 187-195, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Winthrop R.H., 2014. The strange case of cultural services: limits of the ecosystem services paradigm, Ecological Economics, 108, 208-214, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yengué J.L., 2017. Introduction au dossier « Les espaces verts urbains : éclairages sur les services écosystémiques culturels », Environnement urbain, 11, 1-5, https://doi.org/10.7202/1050483ar. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.