EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 19 / Numéro 1 (janvier-mars 2011) Nat. Sci. Soc., 19 1 (2011) 14-21 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Numéro 1, janvier-mars 2011
Page(s) 14 - 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011113
Publié en ligne 10 juin 2011
  • Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker, H., 1964. The Other Side: Perspectives on Deviance, New York, London, Collier Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  • Benton, T., 1994. Biology and social theory in the environmental debate, in Redclift, M., Benton, T. (Eds), Social Theory and the Global Environment, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Buller, H., Morris, C., 2006. Animals and society, in Pretty, J., Benton, T., Guivant, J., Lee, D.R., Orr, D., Pfeffer, M. (Eds), Handbook of Environment and Society, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Burawoy, M., 2005. For public sociology, American Sociological Review, 70, 4-28. [Google Scholar]
  • Burawoy, M., 2008. What is to be done? Theses on the degradation of social existence in a globalising world, Current Sociology, 56, 3, 351-359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buttel, F., Gisjwijt, A., 2001. Emerging trends in environmental sociology, in Blau, J.R. (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Castree, N., Braun, B., 2006. Constructing rural natures, in Cloke, P., Marsden, T., Mooney, P.H. (Eds), Handbook of Rural Studies, London, Sage, 161-170. [Google Scholar]
  • Catton, W.R., Dunlap, R.E., 1978. Environmental sociology: A new paradigm, The American Sociologist, 13, 41-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Cloke, P., Marsden, T., Mooney, P.H. (Eds), 2006. Handbook of Rural Studies, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Duarte, F., 2001. “Save the earth” or “manage the earth”?, Current Sociology, 49, 1, 91-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunlap, R.E, Buttel, F.H., Dickens, P., Gijswijt, A. (Eds), 2002. Sociological Theory and the Environment, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Franklin, A., 2002. Nature and Social Theory, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Giddens, A., 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method, London, Hutchinson. [Google Scholar]
  • Gieryn, T.F., 1995. Boundaries of science, in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C., Pinch, T. (Eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodman, D., Sorj, D., Wilkinson, J., 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development, Oxford, Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodman, D., Redclift, M., 1991. Refashioning Nature: Food, Ecology and Culture, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannigan, J., 1995. Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Huber, M.T., 2008. Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production, Geoforum, 40, 1, 105-115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ingold, T., 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Jansen, K., 2009. Implicit sociology, interdisciplinarity and systems theories in agricultural science, Sociologia Ruralis, 49, 2, 172-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krausmann, F., Schandl, H., Sieberle, R.P., 2008. Socio-ecological regime transitions in Austria and the United Kingdom, Ecological Economics, 65, 187-201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laschewski, L., Penker, M. (Eds), 2009. Special Issue on Rural Change and the Revalorisation of Rural Property, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 1988. The Pasteurisation of France, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, New York, Harvester. [Google Scholar]
  • Lotter, D., 2009. The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science – Part I: The development of a flawed enterprise; Part 2: Academic capitalism and the loss of scientific integrity, International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 16, 1, 31-49 and 50-68. [Google Scholar]
  • Mann, S., Dickinson, J., 1978. Obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture, Journal of Peasant Studies 5, 4, 466-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsden, T. 2003. The Condition of Rural Sustainability, Assen, Van Gorcum. [Google Scholar]
  • Slaughter, S., Leslie, L.L., 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore/London, John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2006. Metabolic urbanisation: The making of cyborg cities, in Heynen, N., Kaika, M., Swyngedouw, E. (Eds), In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Tovey, H., 2008. Introduction: Rural sustainable development in the knowledge society era, Sociologia Ruralis, 48, 3, 185-199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, G., 2005. Sociological theory and the natural environment, History of the Human Sciences, 18, 1, 77-106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wieviorka, M., 2008. Some considerations after reading Michael Burawoy’s article, Current Sociology, 56, 3, 381-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yearley, S., 1996. The Green Case: A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics, London, Unwin Hyman. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.