EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 19 / No 1 (janvier-mars 2011) Nat. Sci. Soc., 19 1 (2011) 14-21 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Number 1, janvier-mars 2011
Page(s) 14 - 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011113
Published online 10 June 2011
  • Beck, U., 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Becker, H., 1964. The Other Side: Perspectives on Deviance, New York, London, Collier Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
  • Benton, T., 1994. Biology and social theory in the environmental debate, in Redclift, M., Benton, T. (Eds), Social Theory and the Global Environment, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Buller, H., Morris, C., 2006. Animals and society, in Pretty, J., Benton, T., Guivant, J., Lee, D.R., Orr, D., Pfeffer, M. (Eds), Handbook of Environment and Society, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Burawoy, M., 2005. For public sociology, American Sociological Review, 70, 4-28. [Google Scholar]
  • Burawoy, M., 2008. What is to be done? Theses on the degradation of social existence in a globalising world, Current Sociology, 56, 3, 351-359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Buttel, F., Gisjwijt, A., 2001. Emerging trends in environmental sociology, in Blau, J.R. (Ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Sociology, Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Castree, N., Braun, B., 2006. Constructing rural natures, in Cloke, P., Marsden, T., Mooney, P.H. (Eds), Handbook of Rural Studies, London, Sage, 161-170. [Google Scholar]
  • Catton, W.R., Dunlap, R.E., 1978. Environmental sociology: A new paradigm, The American Sociologist, 13, 41-49. [Google Scholar]
  • Cloke, P., Marsden, T., Mooney, P.H. (Eds), 2006. Handbook of Rural Studies, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Duarte, F., 2001. “Save the earth” or “manage the earth”?, Current Sociology, 49, 1, 91-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunlap, R.E, Buttel, F.H., Dickens, P., Gijswijt, A. (Eds), 2002. Sociological Theory and the Environment, Oxford, Rowman and Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsyth, T., 2003. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Franklin, A., 2002. Nature and Social Theory, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Giddens, A., 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method, London, Hutchinson. [Google Scholar]
  • Gieryn, T.F., 1995. Boundaries of science, in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G.E., Peterson, J.C., Pinch, T. (Eds), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodman, D., Sorj, D., Wilkinson, J., 1987. From Farming to Biotechnology: A Theory of Agro-Industrial Development, Oxford, Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodman, D., Redclift, M., 1991. Refashioning Nature: Food, Ecology and Culture, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannigan, J., 1995. Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective, New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Huber, M.T., 2008. Energizing historical materialism: Fossil fuels, space and the capitalist mode of production, Geoforum, 40, 1, 105-115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ingold, T., 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Jansen, K., 2009. Implicit sociology, interdisciplinarity and systems theories in agricultural science, Sociologia Ruralis, 49, 2, 172-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krausmann, F., Schandl, H., Sieberle, R.P., 2008. Socio-ecological regime transitions in Austria and the United Kingdom, Ecological Economics, 65, 187-201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Laschewski, L., Penker, M. (Eds), 2009. Special Issue on Rural Change and the Revalorisation of Rural Property, International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 8, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 1988. The Pasteurisation of France, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Latour, B., 1993. We Have Never Been Modern, New York, Harvester. [Google Scholar]
  • Lotter, D., 2009. The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science – Part I: The development of a flawed enterprise; Part 2: Academic capitalism and the loss of scientific integrity, International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 16, 1, 31-49 and 50-68. [Google Scholar]
  • Mann, S., Dickinson, J., 1978. Obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture, Journal of Peasant Studies 5, 4, 466-81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsden, T. 2003. The Condition of Rural Sustainability, Assen, Van Gorcum. [Google Scholar]
  • Slaughter, S., Leslie, L.L., 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University, Baltimore/London, John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Swyngedouw, E., 2006. Metabolic urbanisation: The making of cyborg cities, in Heynen, N., Kaika, M., Swyngedouw, E. (Eds), In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Tovey, H., 2008. Introduction: Rural sustainable development in the knowledge society era, Sociologia Ruralis, 48, 3, 185-199. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, G., 2005. Sociological theory and the natural environment, History of the Human Sciences, 18, 1, 77-106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wieviorka, M., 2008. Some considerations after reading Michael Burawoy’s article, Current Sociology, 56, 3, 381-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yearley, S., 1996. The Green Case: A Sociology of Environmental Issues, Arguments and Politics, London, Unwin Hyman. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.