Open Access
Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 32, Number 3, Juillet/Septembre 2024
Dossier « L’évaluation des jeux sérieux sur les thématiques agro-environnementales, territoriales et alimentaires »
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 293 - 305 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2025004 | |
Published online | 17 March 2025 |
- Bakker T., Dugué P., de Tourdonnet S., 2021. Assessing the effects of Farmer Field Schools on farmers’ trajectories of change in practices, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41, 2, 18, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00667-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Barnaud C., Van Paassen A., 2013. Equity, power games, and legitimacy: dilemmas of participatory natural resource management, Ecology and Society, 18, 2, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05459-180221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Boulestreau Y., Casagrande M., Navarrete M., 2023. A method to design coupled innovations for the agroecological transition. Implementation for soil health management in Provencal sheltered vegetable systems, Agricultural Systems, 212, 103752, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103752. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brougère G., 2012. Le jeu peut-il être sérieux ? Revisiter Jouer/Apprendre en temps de serious game, Australian Journal of French Studies, 49, 2, 117-129, https://doi.org/10.3828/AJFS.2012.10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Carrère P., Galliot J.-N., Perera S., Le Henaff P.M., Faure P., Rocher C., Colin A., Chabalier C., 2021. AEOLE-le-jeu − Un Jeu pour tout comprendre sur les prairies du Massif central, Fourrages, 247, 87-95. [Google Scholar]
- Célerier A., Vallas M., Thénard V., Martin G., Lubac S., Madeline L., 2018. Lauracle : 40 leviers pour l’autonomie fourragère, Communication aux 24es Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, 5-6 décembre, Paris. [Google Scholar]
- Crookall D., 2014. Engaging (in) gameplay and (in) debriefing, Simulation & Gaming, 45, 4-5, 416-427, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114559879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dernat S., Rigolot C., Vollet D., Cayre P., Dumont B., 2022a. Knowledge sharing in practice: a game-based methodology to increase farmers’ engagement in a common vision for a cheese PDO union, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28, 2, 141-162, https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2021.1873155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dernat S., Etienne R., Hostiou N., Pailleux J.-Y., Rigolot C., 2022b. Ex-post consequences of participatory foresight processes in agriculture. How to help dairy farmers to face outcomes of collective decisions planning?, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 776959, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.776959. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dernat S., Angeon V., Michelin Y., 2023. Évaluer le jeu, in Dernat S., Michelin Y., Blache N. (Eds.), Jeux de plateau pour l’agriculture et le paysage, Versailles, Quæ, 17-55. [Google Scholar]
- Dernat S., Grillot M., Andreotti F., Martel G., 2023. A sustainable game changer? Systematic review of serious games used for agriculture and research agenda, Agricultural Systems, 222, 104178, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104178. [Google Scholar]
- Dernat S., Verchere A., Johany F., Simeone A., Lardon S., 2018. Évaluer l’effet de professionnels dans une activité collaborative au service de l’accompagnement de l’orientation des étudiants. Une entrée en animatique des groupes par l’étude des conflits socio-cognitifs, Phronesis, 7, 1, 24-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dolinska A., 2017. Bringing farmers into the game. Strengthening farmers’ role in the innovation process through a simulation game, a case from Tunisia, Agricultural Systems, 157, 129-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.07.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Emmerich K., Bockholt M., 2016. Serious games evaluation: processes, models, and concepts, in Dörner R., Göbel S., Kickmeier-Rust M., Masuch M., Zweig K. (Eds), Entertainment computing and serious games. Lecture notes in computer science, Cham, Springer, 265-283, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46152-6_11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Engström H., Backlund P., 2022. Serious games design knowledge − Experiences from a decade (+) of serious games development, EAI Endorsed Transactions on Serious Games, https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-5-2021.170008. [Google Scholar]
- Etienne R., 2023. Accompagner des agriculteurs à l’aide d’une combinaison de jeux sérieux : quelles contributions aux changements de pratiques ? Thèse de doctorat en agro-écologie, Paris, AgroParisTech, https://pastel.hal.science/tel-04532244. [Google Scholar]
- Falk T., Zhang W., Meinzen-Dick R., Bartels L., Sanil R., Priyadarshini P., Soliev I., 2023. Games for experiential learning: triggering collective changes in commons management, Ecology and Society, 28, 1, 30, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13862-280130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Flood S., Cradock-Henry N.A., Blackett P., Edwards P., 2018. Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making, Environmental Research Letters, 13, 6, 063005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac1c6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- García-Barrios L., Cruz-Morales J., Vandermeer J., Perfecto I., 2017. The Azteca chess experience: learning how to share concepts of ecological complexity with small coffee farmers, Ecology and Society, 22, 2, 20. [Google Scholar]
- Hassenforder É., Dray A., Daré W., 2020. Manuel d’observation des jeux sérieux, Montpellier, CIRAD, https://agritrop.cirad.fr/596224/1/Manuel_ComMod_Observation_Jeux_2020_WEB.pdf. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez-Aguilera J.N., Mauerman M., Herrera A., Vasilaky K., Baethgen W., Loboguerrero A.M., Diro R., Tekeste Y.T., Osgood D., 2020. Games and fieldwork in agriculture: a systematic review of the 21st century in economics and social science, Games, 11, 4, 47, https://doi.org/10.3390/g11040047. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Jouan J., Carof M., Baccar R., Bareille N., Bastian S., Brogna D., Burgio G., Couvreur S., Cupiał M., Dufrêne M. et al., 2021. SEGAE: An online serious game to learn agroecology, Agricultural Systems, 191, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103145. [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick J.D., Kirkpatrick W.K., 2016. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation, Alexandria (VA), USA, ATD Press, 238. [Google Scholar]
- Klerkx L., Aarts N., Leeuwis C., 2010. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: the interactions between innovation networks and their environment, Agricultural Systems, 103, 6, 390-400, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.03.012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lacombe C., Couix N., Hazard L., Gressier E., 2018. L’accompagnement de la transition agroécologique : un objet en construction, Pour, 234-235, 2, 217-223. [Google Scholar]
- Le Gal P.-Y., Dugué P., Faure G., Novak S., 2011. How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review, Agricultural Systems, 104, 9, 714-728, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2011.07.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Martel G., Alignier A., Meslin E., 2022. PayZZage. Communication à la 26e édition des Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, 7-8 décembre, Paris, https://hal.science/hal-03948615. [Google Scholar]
- Martin G., Felten B., Duru M., 2011. Forage rummy: a game to support the participatory design of adapted livestock systems, Environmental Modelling & Software, 26, 12, 1442-1453, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Martin G., Moraine M., Ryschawy J., Magne M.-A., Asai M., Sarthou J.-P., Duru M., Therond O., 2016. Crop-livestock integration beyond the farm level: a review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36, 3, 53, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0390-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Martin G., Allain S., Bergez J.-E., Burger-Leenhardt D., Constantin J., Duru M., Hazard L., Lacombe C., Magda D., Magne M.-A. et al., 2018. How to address sustainability transition of farming systems? A position paper presented at the 13th European IFSA Symposium, International Farming Systems Association (IFSA), 1-5 July, Chania (Crete, Greece), https://doi.org/10.3390/SU10062083. [Google Scholar]
- Mislevy R.J., Behrens J.T., Dicerbo K.E., Frezzo D.C., West P., 2012. Three things game designers need to know about assessment, in Ifenthaler D., Eseryel D., Ge X. (Eds), Assessment in game-based learning: foundations, innovations, perspectives, New York, NY, Springer, 5981, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4_5. [Google Scholar]
- Moojen F.G., Ryschawy J., dos Santos D.T., Barth Neto A., Vieira P.C., Portella E., de Faccio Carvalho P.C., 2022. The farm coaching experience to support the transition to integrated crop-livestock systems: from gaming to action, Agricultural Systems, 196, 103339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Morris J., Ensor J.E., Pfeifer C., Marchan R., Mulatu D.W., Soka G., Ouedraogo-Kone S., Wakeyo M.B., Topi C., 2020. Games as boundary objects: charting trade-offs in sustainable livestock transformation, International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2020.1738769. [Google Scholar]
- Murphrey T., Koswatta T., Dooley K., Edgar L., 2018. An analysis of evaluation methods implemented in studies published in the Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education from 1994 to 2018: a 25 Year Review, Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 25, 27-39, https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2018.25402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- DeWalt K.M., DeWalt B.R., 2011. Participant observation. A guide for fieldworkers, Lanham (MD), Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
- Peters V., Everwijn H., van de Westelaken M., 2014. The evaluation of a discipline: a framework for evaluating simulation games, in Duke R.D., Kriz W.C., Back to the future of gaming, Bielefeld, W. Bertelsmann, 168-186, https://isaga.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/The-evaluation-of-a-discipline-a-framework.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Plass J.L., Homer B.D., Kinzer C.K., 2015. Foundations of game-based learning, Educational Psychologist, 50, 4, 258-283, https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Quach A., 2019. Debriefing cards, #OpenSeriousGames, https://openseriousgames.org/. [Google Scholar]
- Robiou du Pont Z., 2022. Jeux sérieux et adaptation des systèmes fourragers au changement climatique : la mobilisation de Dynamix dans le territoire AOP Fourme de Montbrison. Mémoire de fin d’études d’ingénieur agronome, Rennes, Institut Agro Montpellier. [Google Scholar]
- Rodela R., Ligtenberg A., Bosma R., 2019. Conceptualizing serious games as a learning-based intervention in the context of natural resources and environmental governance, Water, 11, 2, 245, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rodela R., Speelman E.N., 2023. Serious games in natural resource management: steps toward assessment of their contextualized impacts, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 65, 101375, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ryschawy J., Grillot M., Charmeau A., Pelletier A., Moraine M., Martin G., 2022. A participatory approach based on the serious game Dynamix to co-design scenarios of crop-livestock integration among farms, Agricultural Systems, 201, 103414, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sanchez E., Martinez-Emin V., Mandran N., 2015. Jeu-game, jeu-play, vers une modélisation du jeu. Une étude empirique à partir des traces numériques d’interaction du jeu Tamagocours, Sciences et Technologies de l’Information et de la Communication pour l’Éducation et la Formation, 22, 1, 9-44, https://doi.org/10.3406/stice.2015.1685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sautier M., 2013. Outiller l’adaptation des élevages herbagers au changement climatique : de l’analyse de la vulnérabilité à la conception participative de systèmes d’élevage. Thèse de doctorat en agrosystèmes, écosystèmes et environnement, Toulouse, INPT. [Google Scholar]
- Stanitsas M., Kirytopoulos K., Vareilles E., 2019. Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: a systematic literature review, Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 924-936, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.