Dossier « L’évaluation des jeux sérieux sur les thématiques agro-environnementales, territoriales et alimentaires » – Jeux évaluatifs, endo-évaluatifs et imputation causale

Home

All issues

Volume 32 / No 3 (Juillet/Septembre 2024)

Nat. Sci. Soc., 32 3 (2024) 279-292

References

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 32, Number 3, Juillet/Septembre 2024 Dossier « L’évaluation des jeux sérieux sur les thématiques agro-environnementales, territoriales et alimentaires »


Page(s)		279 - 292
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2025003
Published online		17 March 2025

Abrami G., Ferrand N., Morardet S., Murgue C., Popova A., De Fooij H., Farolfi S., Du Toit D., Aquae-Gaudi W., 2012. Wat-A-Game, a toolkit for building role-playing games about integrated water management, in Seppelt R., Voinov A.A., Lange S., Bankamp D. (Eds), International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs). 2012 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Managing Resources of a Limited Planet, Sixth Biennial Meeting, 1-5 juillet, Leipzig, https://agritrop.cirad.fr/565254/1/document_565254.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Abrami G., Becu N., 2021.Concevoir et utiliser des jeux de rôle pour la gestion de l’eau et des territoires, Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 35, 46-53, https://revue-set.fr/article/view/6982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
AfroMaison, 2014. Afromaison Mpan’game Uganda, YouTube, www.youtube.com/watch?v=D10g-JjUrYU. [Google Scholar]
Allal-Chérif O., Makhlouf M., Bajard A., 2015. Les serious games au service de la gestion des ressources humaines : une cartographie dans les entreprises du CAC40, Systèmes d’information & Management, 19, 3, 97-126, https://doi.org/10.3917/sim.143.0097. [Google Scholar]
Armstrong M., Taylor S., 2014. Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice, London/Philadelphia, Kogan Page. [Google Scholar]
Aubert A.H., Medema W., Wals A.E.J., 2019. Towards a framework for designing and assessing game-based approaches for sustainable water governance, Water, 11, 4, 869, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040869. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Aucante M., Lombard-Latune R., Ba A., Cheval C., Moretti P., Ferrand N., 2021. Planifier des systèmes d’assainissement avec les acteurs en intégrant des connaissances techniques expertes : enjeux de modélisation et transfert de WasteWAG au Sénégal, Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 35, 60-67, https://revue-set.fr/article/view/6984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Becu N., 2006. Identification et modélisation des représentations des acteurs locaux pour la gestion des bassins versants. Thèse de doctorat en hydrosciences, Montpellier, Université de Montpellier II. [Google Scholar]
Biggeri M., Ferrannini A., 2014. Opportunity gap analysis: procedures and methods for applying the capability approach in development initiatives, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15, 1, 60-78, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2013.837036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bonifazi M., Le Coq J.-F., Rapidel B., Sibelet N., Freguin S., Ferrand N., 2016. Participatory simulation to test incentives for provisioning ecosystem services in agroforestry systems. Costa Rica. Paper presented at the EcoSummit 2016. Ecological Sustainability: Engineering Change, 29 August-1 September, Montpellier. [Google Scholar]
Bots P., van Daalen E., 2007. Functional design of games to support natural resource management policy development, Simulation & Gaming, 38, 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878107300674. [Google Scholar]
Caillois R., 1958. Les jeux et les hommes (Le masque et le vertige), Paris, Gallimard, https://monoskop.org/images/4/41/Caillois_Roger_Les_jeux_et_les_hommes_1958.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Cardenas J.-C., Janssen M., Bousquet F., 2013. Dynamics of rules and resources: three new field experiments on water, forests and fisheries, in List J.A., Price M.K. (Eds), Handbook on experimental economics and the environment, Cheltenham/Northampton (Mass), Edward Elgar, 319-345, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781009079.00020. [Google Scholar]
Carpenter J.P., Harrison G.J., List J.A., 2005. Field experiments in economics: an introduction, in Harrison G.J., Carpenter J.P., List J.A. (Eds), Field experiments in economics, Bingley (UK), Emerald Group, 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-2306(04)10001-X. [Google Scholar]
Chuah S.H., Hoffmann R., Jones M., Williams G., 2007. Do cultures clash? Evidence from cross-national ultimatum game experiments, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64, 1, 35-48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.04.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Collock, 2019. PwC x Collock : un escape game de recrutement, YouTube, www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8T5oicDlqM&t=6s. [Google Scholar]
Daré W., 2005. Comportements des acteurs dans le jeu et dans la réalité : indépendance ou correspondance ? Analyse sociologique de l’utilisation de jeux de rôles en aide à la concertation. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de l’environnement, Paris, ENGREF (AgroParisTech), https://pastel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00452429. [Google Scholar]
Den Haan R.-J., Van der Voort M.C., 2018. On evaluating social learning outcomes of serious games to collaboratively address sustainability problems: a literature review, Sustainability, 10, 4529, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dernat S., Grillot M., Guerrier F., Martel G., Salliou N., Terrier-Gesbert M., 2022. L’évaluation des jeux en agriculture, alimentation, environnement et territoires, Actes des 1^res journées GAMAE, Journées GAMAE 2022, 9-10 juin, Clermont-Ferrand, https://inria.hal.science/hal-03768182. [Google Scholar]
Duke R.D., 1974. Gaming: the future’s language, Beverly Hills (CA), SAGE. [Google Scholar]
Étienne M. (Ed.), 2010. La modélisation d’accompagnement. Une démarche participative en appui au développement durable, Versailles, Quæ. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Feldt A.G., 2014. Experience with simulation/gaming: 1960-2010, Simulation and Gaming, 45, 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114543983. [Google Scholar]
Ferrand N., Daniell K.A., 2006. Comment évaluer la contribution de la modélisation participative au développement durable ? Séminaire interdisciplinaire sur le développement durable, novembre, Lille, https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02933305. [Google Scholar]
Ferrand N., Hassenforder É., Aquae-Gaudi W., 2021. L’approche CoOPLAGE. Quand les acteurs modélisent ensemble leur situation, principes ou plans pour décider et changer durablement, en autonomie, Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 35, 14-23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gasper D., 2007. What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers, Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2006.12.001. [Google Scholar]
Giraud G., 2009. La théorie des jeux, Paris, Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
Harrison G.W., List J.A., 2004. Field experiments, Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 4, 1009‑1055, https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051043004577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hassenforder É., Pittock J., Barreteau O., Daniell K.A., Ferrand N., 2016. The MEPPP framework: a framework for monitoring and evaluating participatory planning processes, Environmental Management Journal, 57, 1, 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0599-5. [Google Scholar]
Hassenforder É., Dray A., Daré W., 2020. Manuel d’observation des jeux sérieux, Montpellier, CIRAD/ComMod Association. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hassenforder É., Ferrand N., 2021. Évaluer une démarche participative, Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 35, 90-95, https://revue-set.fr/article/view/6988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Heckman J.J., Corbin C.O., 2016. Capabilities and skills, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 17, 3, https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2016.1200541. [Google Scholar]
Huizinga J., 1938. Homo ludens. Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur, Groningen, Wolters- Noordhoff. Trad. fr. : Homo ludens : essai sur la fonction sociale du jeu, Paris, Gallimard, 1988. [Google Scholar]
Janssen M.-A., Bousquet F., Cardenas J.-C., Castillo D., Worrapimphong K., 2013. Breaking the elected rules in a field experiment on forestry resources, Ecological Economics, 90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.03.012. [Google Scholar]
Jones N.A., Perez P., Measham T.G., Kelly G.J., D’Aquino P., Daniell K.A., Dray A., Ferrand N., 2009. Evaluating participatory modeling: developing a framework for cross-case analysis, Environmental Management, 44, 1180-1195, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-009-9391-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Le Page C., Dray A., Perez P., Garcia C., 2016. Exploring how knowledge and communication influence natural resources management with rehab, Simulation and Gaming, 47, 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116632900. [Google Scholar]
Loudin S., 2019. Can we use a social experiment to assess the impact of participatory processes for water management? Studying a generic method tackling the evaluation of capabilities. Thèse de doctorat en sciences de l’eau, Paris, Institut agronomique, vétérinaire et forestier de France. [Google Scholar]
Loudin S., Ferrand N., Garin P., Pelenc J., Bonnard S., 2022. Evaluating the impacts of participatory processes for water management: a theoretical proposal based on the capability approach, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 24, 3-4, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSD.2021.122711. [Google Scholar]
Madsen D.Ø., Stenheim T., 2015. Experimental methods in economics and psychology: a comparison, Procedia − Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.022. [Google Scholar]
Maurel P., Craps M., Cernesson F., Raymond R., Valkering P., Ferrand N., 2007. Concepts and methods for analysing the role of information and communication tools (IC-tools) in social learning processes for river basin management, Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 5, 630‑639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.12.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Meadows D., 2007. A brief and incomplete history of operational gaming in system dynamics, System Dynamics Review, 23, 2-3, https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.372. [Google Scholar]
Meadows D.L., Fiddaman T., Shannon D., 1993. Fish banks, LTD. Game administrator’s and materials manuals, Durham, University of New Hampshire. [Google Scholar]
Pelenc J., Bazile D., Ceruti C., 2015. Collective capability and collective agency for sustainability: a case study, Ecological economics, 118, 226-239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Perez P., Aubert S., Daré W., Ducrot R., Jones N., Queste J., Trébuil G., Van Paassen A., 2010. Chapitre 6. Évaluation et suivi des effets de la démarche, in Étienne M. (Ed.), La modélisation d’accompagnement. Une démarche participative en appui au développement durable, Versailles, Quæ, 153-181, https://doi.org/10.3917/quae.etien.2010.01.0013. [Google Scholar]
Poteete A.R., Janssen M.A., Ostrom E., 2010. Working together: collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice, Princeton/Oxford, Princeton University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Richard Ferroudji A., Barreteau O., 2007. Concert’Eau: a setting to experiment difficulties of pluralisms. Paper presented at the ISAGA 2007 Conference (International Simulation and Gaming Association), Organizing and Learning through Gaming and Simulation, July 9-13, Nijmegen (The Netherlands), https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00468539. [Google Scholar]
Richebourg C., 2019. Participations citoyennes au processus de réforme foncière au Sénégal (2010-2017) : TerriStories, un jeu de rôles et de simulations pour faire délibérer des paysans ? Thèse de doctorat en sociologie politique, Paris, EHESS. [Google Scholar]
Ruiz-Pérez M., Franco-Múgica F., González J.A., Gómez-Baggethun E., Alberruche-Rico M.A., 2011. An institutional analysis of the sustainability of fisheries: insights from FishBanks simulation game, Ocean and Coastal Management, 54, 8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.05.009. [Google Scholar]
Sen A., 2000. Development as freedom, New York, Anchor books. [Google Scholar]
Smajgl A., Brown D.G., Valbuena D., Huigen M.G.A., 2011. Empirical characterisation of agent behaviours in socio-ecological systems, Environmental Modelling and Software, 26, 7, 837-844, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.02.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Viceisza A.C.G., 2015. Creating a lab in the field: economics experiments for policymaking, Journal of Economic Surveys, 30, 5, 835-854, https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12118. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.