EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 18 / Numéro 4 (octobre-décembre 2010) Nat. Sci. Soc., 18 4 (2010) 414-423 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 18, Numéro 4, octobre-décembre 2010
Dossier « Le réveil du dodo III »
Page(s) 414 - 423
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011005
Publié en ligne 17 mars 2011
  • Allsopp, M.H., de Lange, W.J., Veldtman, R., 2008. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement, PLoS ONE, 3, 9, e3128, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128. [Google Scholar]
  • Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R.E., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K., Turner, R.K., 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature, Science, 297, 5583, 950-953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Faber, M., Manstetten, R., 2006. Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation, Ecological Economics, 56, 4, 487-498. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Braat, L., ten Brink P. (Eds), 2008. The Cost of Policy Inaction (COPI): The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target. Final Report to the European Commission, Wageningen/Brussels (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/teeb_en.htm). [Google Scholar]
  • Chee, Y.E., 2004. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystems services, Biological Conservation, 120, 549-565. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Pujol, J.-L. (Eds), Centre d’analyse stratégique, 2009. Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes, Paris, La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde, T., 2006. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity, Ecological Economics, 58, 4, 304–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141, 350-352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naem, S., O’Neil, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., Van der Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387, 253–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daily, G.C. (Ed.), 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F.S., III, Tilman, D., 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-Being, PLOS Biology, 6, 3, 300-1305. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 643–653. [Google Scholar]
  • Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J., Vaissière, B.E., 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 810–821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Godard, O., 2005. Les conditions d’une gestion économique de la biodiversité : un parallèle avec le changement climatique, Cahiers du CECO, Paris, École polytechnique. [Google Scholar]
  • Goeschl, T., Swanson, T., 2007. Designing the legacy library of genetic resources: Approaches, methods and results, in Kontoleon, A., Pascual, U., Swanson, T. (Eds), Biodiversity Economics: Principles, Methods and Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 273-291. [Google Scholar]
  • Kassar, I., Lasserre, P., 2004. Species preservation and biodiversity value: A real option approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 857-879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krutilla, J.V., 1967. Conservation reconsidered, American Economic Review, 57, 4, 777-786. [Google Scholar]
  • Krutilla, J.V., Fisher, A.C., 1975. The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources, Baltimore (MD), John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Roux, X., Barbault, R., Baudry, J., Burel, F., Doussan, I., Garnier, E., Herzog, F., Lavorel, S., Lifran, R., Roger-Estrade, J., Sarthou, J.-P., Trommetter, M., 2008. Agriculture et biodiversité : valoriser les synergies. Expertise scientifique collective, Synthèse du rapport, INRA (France). [Google Scholar]
  • Leroux, A.D., Martin, V.L., Goeschl, T., 2009. Optimal conservation, extinction debt, and the augmented quasi-option value, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 1, 43-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Loomis, J.B., White, D.S., 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 18, 3, 197-206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCauley, D.J., 2006. Selling out on nature, Nature, 443, 7, 27-28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Merlo, M., Croitoru, L. (Eds), 2005. Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Toward Total Economic Value, Wallingford, Oxfordshire (UK), Cambridge (MA), CABI Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Metrick, A., Weitzman, M.L., 1998. Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 3, 21-34. [Google Scholar]
  • Musgrave, R., 1987. Merit goods, in Eatwell, J., Millgate, M., Neuman, P. (Eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionnary of Economics, London, MacMillan, 452-453. [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson, J.P., Kennedy, P.E., 2009. The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: An assessment, Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 3, 345-377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard, R.B., Bode, C., Values Reading Group, 1998. Next the value of God, and other reactions, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 37–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norton, B. (Ed.), 1986. The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Norton, B., 1987. Why Preserve Natural Variety?, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Page, T., 1977. Conservation and Economic Efficiency, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 2007. Do we really care about biodiversity?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 313-333. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D., Barbier, E., Markandya, A., 1990. Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World, Aldershot, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Polasky, S., Solow, A., 1999. Conserving biological diversity with scarce resources, in Klopatek, J., Gardner, R. (Eds), Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications, New York, Springer Verlag, 154-174. [Google Scholar]
  • Polasky, S., Camm, J.D., Garber-Yonts, B., 2001. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: An application to terrestrial vertabrate conservation in Oregon, Land Economics, 77, 1, 68-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Polasky, S., Costello, C., Solow, A., 2005. The economics of biodiversity conservation, in Vincent, J., Mäler, K.-G. (Eds), The Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland, vol. 3, 1517-1560. [Google Scholar]
  • Purvis, A., Hector, A., 2000. Getting the measure of biodiversity, Nature, 405, 212-219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rees, W.E., 1998. How should a parasite value its host?, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 49–52. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson, L., Loomis, J., 2009. The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 68, 5, 1535-1548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sagoff, M., 2008. On the economic value of ecosystem services, Environmental Values, 17, 239–257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarr, M., Goeschl, T., Swanson, T., 2008. The value of conserving genetic resources for R&D: A survey, Ecological Economics, 67, 2, 184–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sukhdev, P. (Ed.), 2008. The Economic of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Interim Report, European Community (online: http://www.teebweb.org/ForPolicymakers/tabid/1019/Default.aspx [TEEB Interim Report]). [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy makers. Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature (online: http://www.teebweb.org/ForPolicymakers/tabid/1019/Default.aspx [TEEB for Policy Makers Summury]). [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Lehman, C., 2005. Diversity, productivity and temporal stability in the economies of humans and nature, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 3, 405-426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toman, M., 1998. Why not to calculate the value of the World’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 57-60. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., 2003. Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions, Ecological Economic, 46, 493-510. [Google Scholar]
  • Weikard, H.P., 2002. Diversity functions and the value of biodiversity, Land Economics, 78, 1, 20-27. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Weitzman, M.L., 1998. The Noah’s Ark problem, Econometrica, 66, 6, 1279-1298. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman, W., 1977. How much are nature’s services worth, Science, 197, 960–964. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, E.O. (Ed.), 1988. Biodiversity, Washington (DC), National Academy of Sciences / Smithsonian Institution. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, M.A., Howarth, R.B., 2002. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation, Ecological Economics, 41, 3, 431-443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 253-260. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.