EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 18 / No 4 (octobre-décembre 2010) Nat. Sci. Soc., 18 4 (2010) 414-423 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 18, Number 4, octobre-décembre 2010
Dossier « Le réveil du dodo III »
Page(s) 414 - 423
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011005
Published online 17 March 2011
  • Allsopp, M.H., de Lange, W.J., Veldtman, R., 2008. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement, PLoS ONE, 3, 9, e3128, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003128. [Google Scholar]
  • Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R.E., Jenkins, M., Jefferiss, P., Jessamy, V., Madden, J., Munro, K., Myers, N., Naeem, S., Paavola, J., Rayment, M., Rosendo, S., Roughgarden, J., Trumper, K., Turner, R.K., 2002. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature, Science, 297, 5583, 950-953. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Baumgärtner, S., Becker, C., Faber, M., Manstetten, R., 2006. Relative and absolute scarcity of nature. Assessing the roles of economics and ecology for biodiversity conservation, Ecological Economics, 56, 4, 487-498. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Braat, L., ten Brink P. (Eds), 2008. The Cost of Policy Inaction (COPI): The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target. Final Report to the European Commission, Wageningen/Brussels (http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/teeb_en.htm). [Google Scholar]
  • Chee, Y.E., 2004. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystems services, Biological Conservation, 120, 549-565. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Pujol, J.-L. (Eds), Centre d’analyse stratégique, 2009. Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes, Paris, La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Christie, M., Hanley, N., Warren, J., Murphy, K., Wright, R., Hyde, T., 2006. Valuing the diversity of biodiversity, Ecological Economics, 58, 4, 304–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141, 350-352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naem, S., O’Neil, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton, P., Van der Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387, 253–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daily, G.C. (Ed.), 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F.S., III, Tilman, D., 2006. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-Being, PLOS Biology, 6, 3, 300-1305. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 643–653. [Google Scholar]
  • Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J., Vaissière, B.E., 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 810–821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Godard, O., 2005. Les conditions d’une gestion économique de la biodiversité : un parallèle avec le changement climatique, Cahiers du CECO, Paris, École polytechnique. [Google Scholar]
  • Goeschl, T., Swanson, T., 2007. Designing the legacy library of genetic resources: Approaches, methods and results, in Kontoleon, A., Pascual, U., Swanson, T. (Eds), Biodiversity Economics: Principles, Methods and Applications, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 273-291. [Google Scholar]
  • Kassar, I., Lasserre, P., 2004. Species preservation and biodiversity value: A real option approach, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 857-879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krutilla, J.V., 1967. Conservation reconsidered, American Economic Review, 57, 4, 777-786. [Google Scholar]
  • Krutilla, J.V., Fisher, A.C., 1975. The Economics of Natural Environments: Studies in the Valuation of Commodity and Amenity Resources, Baltimore (MD), John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Roux, X., Barbault, R., Baudry, J., Burel, F., Doussan, I., Garnier, E., Herzog, F., Lavorel, S., Lifran, R., Roger-Estrade, J., Sarthou, J.-P., Trommetter, M., 2008. Agriculture et biodiversité : valoriser les synergies. Expertise scientifique collective, Synthèse du rapport, INRA (France). [Google Scholar]
  • Leroux, A.D., Martin, V.L., Goeschl, T., 2009. Optimal conservation, extinction debt, and the augmented quasi-option value, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58, 1, 43-57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Loomis, J.B., White, D.S., 1996. Economic benefits of rare and endangered species: Summary and meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 18, 3, 197-206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCauley, D.J., 2006. Selling out on nature, Nature, 443, 7, 27-28. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Merlo, M., Croitoru, L. (Eds), 2005. Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Toward Total Economic Value, Wallingford, Oxfordshire (UK), Cambridge (MA), CABI Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Metrick, A., Weitzman, M.L., 1998. Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 3, 21-34. [Google Scholar]
  • Musgrave, R., 1987. Merit goods, in Eatwell, J., Millgate, M., Neuman, P. (Eds), The New Palgrave: A Dictionnary of Economics, London, MacMillan, 452-453. [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson, J.P., Kennedy, P.E., 2009. The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: An assessment, Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 3, 345-377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard, R.B., Bode, C., Values Reading Group, 1998. Next the value of God, and other reactions, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 37–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norton, B. (Ed.), 1986. The Preservation of Species: The Value of Biological Diversity, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Norton, B., 1987. Why Preserve Natural Variety?, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Page, T., 1977. Conservation and Economic Efficiency, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 2007. Do we really care about biodiversity?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 313-333. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D., Barbier, E., Markandya, A., 1990. Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World, Aldershot, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Polasky, S., Solow, A., 1999. Conserving biological diversity with scarce resources, in Klopatek, J., Gardner, R. (Eds), Landscape Ecological Analysis: Issues and Applications, New York, Springer Verlag, 154-174. [Google Scholar]
  • Polasky, S., Camm, J.D., Garber-Yonts, B., 2001. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: An application to terrestrial vertabrate conservation in Oregon, Land Economics, 77, 1, 68-78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Polasky, S., Costello, C., Solow, A., 2005. The economics of biodiversity conservation, in Vincent, J., Mäler, K.-G. (Eds), The Handbook of Environmental Economics, Amsterdam, North-Holland, vol. 3, 1517-1560. [Google Scholar]
  • Purvis, A., Hector, A., 2000. Getting the measure of biodiversity, Nature, 405, 212-219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rees, W.E., 1998. How should a parasite value its host?, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 49–52. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson, L., Loomis, J., 2009. The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysis, Ecological Economics, 68, 5, 1535-1548. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sagoff, M., 2008. On the economic value of ecosystem services, Environmental Values, 17, 239–257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarr, M., Goeschl, T., Swanson, T., 2008. The value of conserving genetic resources for R&D: A survey, Ecological Economics, 67, 2, 184–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sukhdev, P. (Ed.), 2008. The Economic of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. Interim Report, European Community (online: http://www.teebweb.org/ForPolicymakers/tabid/1019/Default.aspx [TEEB Interim Report]). [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy makers. Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature (online: http://www.teebweb.org/ForPolicymakers/tabid/1019/Default.aspx [TEEB for Policy Makers Summury]). [Google Scholar]
  • Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Lehman, C., 2005. Diversity, productivity and temporal stability in the economies of humans and nature, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 3, 405-426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toman, M., 1998. Why not to calculate the value of the World’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 57-60. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., 2003. Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions, Ecological Economic, 46, 493-510. [Google Scholar]
  • Weikard, H.P., 2002. Diversity functions and the value of biodiversity, Land Economics, 78, 1, 20-27. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Weitzman, M.L., 1998. The Noah’s Ark problem, Econometrica, 66, 6, 1279-1298. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Westman, W., 1977. How much are nature’s services worth, Science, 197, 960–964. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, E.O. (Ed.), 1988. Biodiversity, Washington (DC), National Academy of Sciences / Smithsonian Institution. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, M.A., Howarth, R.B., 2002. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: Establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation, Ecological Economics, 41, 3, 431-443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremen, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 253-260. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.