Open Access
Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 18, Number 4, octobre-décembre 2010
Dossier « Le réveil du dodo III »
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 405 - 413 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011004 | |
Published online | 17 March 2011 |
- Afeissa, H.S., 2007. Éthique de l’environnement : nature, valeur, respect, Paris, J. Vrin. [Google Scholar]
- Blandin, P., 2009. De la protection de la nature au pilotage de la biodiversité, Paris, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
- Callicott, J.B., 1989a. The conceptual Foundations of the Land Ethic, In Defense of the Land Ethic : Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany (NY), State University of New York Press, 75-100. [Google Scholar]
- Callicott, J.B., 1989b. Elements of an environmental ethic, In Defense of the Land Ethic, op. cit., 63-74. [Google Scholar]
- Callicott, J.B., 1999a. Intrinsic value in nature : A metaethical analysis, Beyond the Land Ethic : More Essays in Environmental Philosophy, Albany (NY), State University of New York Press, 239-261. [Google Scholar]
- Callicott, J.B., 1999b. Do deconstructive ecology and sociobiology undermine the Leopold land ethic?, Beyond the Land Ethic, op. cit., 117-139. [Google Scholar]
- Callicott, J.B., 1999c. Holistic environmental ethics and the problem of ecofascism, Beyond the Land Ethic, op. cit., 59-77. [Google Scholar]
- Canguilhem, G., 1974. La question de l’écologie. La technique ou la vie, Dialogue, mars, 37-44. Article joint en annexe de Dagognet, F., 2000. Considérations sur l’idée de nature, Paris, J. Vrin, 183-189. [Google Scholar]
- Carson, R.L., 1962. Silent Spring, Boston, Houghton Mifflin. Trad. fr. : Printemps silencieux, Marseille, Wildproject, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ferry, L., 1992. Le Nouvel Ordre écologique, Paris, Grasset. [Google Scholar]
- Génot, J.-C., 2003. Quelle éthique pour la nature?, Aix-en-Provence, Édisud. [Google Scholar]
- Gould, S.J., 1996 [éd. orig. 1993]. Un soir bien peu enchanté, Comme les huit doigts de la main : réflexions sur l’histoire naturelle, Paris, Le Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Hargrove, E.C., 1989. Foundations of Environmental Ethics, Englewood Cliffs (NJ), Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
- Jamieson, D., 2008. Ethics and the Environment : An Introduction, Cambridge (UK) and New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Jonas, Hans, 1990 [éd. orig. 1979]. Le Principe responsabilité : une éthique pour la civilisation technologique, Paris, Éditions du Cerf. [Google Scholar]
- Kant, E., 1985. Œuvres philosophiques, t. II, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Larrère, C., 1997. Les Philosophies de l’environnement, Paris, PUF. [Google Scholar]
- Leopold, A., 1995 [éd. orig. 1949]. Almanach d’un comté des sables, Paris, Aubier. [Google Scholar]
- Light, A., 2003. The case for practical pluralism, in Light, A., Rolston III, H. (Eds), Environmental Ethics : An Anthology, Malden (MA), Blackwell Publishing, 229-247. [Google Scholar]
- Light, A., Rolston III, H. (Eds), 2003. Environmental Ethics : An Anthology, op. cit. [Google Scholar]
- Meadows, D., 1972. The Limits to Growth : A Global Challenge. A Report for the Club of Rome Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York. [Google Scholar]
- Midgley, M., 1985. Evolution as a Religion, London and New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Naess, A., 1973. The shallow and the deep, Long Range Ecology Movement : A summary, Inquiry, 16, 1-4, 95-100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Naess, A., 2008 [ed. orig. angl. 1989]. Écologie, communauté et style de vie, [Paris], Éditions MF. [Google Scholar]
- Nash, R.F., 1967. Wilderness and the American Mind, New Haven, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Norton, B.G., 1987. Why Preserve Natural Variety?, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Preston, C.J., 1998. Epistemology and intrinsic values : Norton and Callicott’s critiques of Rolston, Environmental Ethics, 20, 4, 405-422. [Google Scholar]
- Rolston III, H., 1987. Duties to ecosystems, in Callicott, B.J. (Ed.), Companion to a Sand County Almanac, Madison, The University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar]
- Rolston III, H., 1994a. Value in nature and the nature of value, reproduit in Light, A., Rolston III, H. (Eds), 2003. Environmental Ethics : An Anthology, Malden (MA), Blackwell Publishing, 143-153. [Google Scholar]
- Rolston III, H., 1994b. Conserving Natural Value, New York, Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Roose, F. de, Van Parijs, P., 1991. La Pensée écologique : essai d’inventaire à l’usage de ceux qui la pratiquent comme de ceux qui la craignent, Bruxelles, De Boeck Université. [Google Scholar]
- Routley, R., 1973. Is there a need for a new, an environmental, ethic?, Proceedings of the XV World Congress of Philosophy, 17th to 22nd September 1973, Varna, Bulgaria, Sofia Press, 205-210. [Google Scholar]
- Singer, P., 1973. Animal liberation, The New York Review of Books, 20, 5. [Google Scholar]
- Singer, P., 1975. Animal Liberation : A New Ethics for our Treatment of Animals, New York, New York Review. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, P.W., 1981. The ethics of respect for nature, Environmental Ethics, 3, 3, 197-218. [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, P.W., 1986. Respect for Nature : A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton (NJ), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, Y., 1998. Le sujet de droit, la personne et la nature, Le Débat, 100, mai-août, 85-107. [Google Scholar]
- Weston, A., 1996. Beyond intrinsic value : Pragmatism in environmental ethics, in Light, A., Katz, E. (Eds), Environmental Pragmatism, London and New York, Routledge, 285-306. [Google Scholar]
- White, Jr., L., 1967. The historical roots of our ecological crisis, Science, 155, 3767, 1203–1207. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiggins, D., 2000. Nature, respect for nature, and the human scale of values, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 100, 1, 1-32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.