Accès gratuit
Numéro
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 17, Numéro 2, Avril-Juin 2009
Page(s) 185 - 193
Section Actualités de la recherche
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2009031
Publié en ligne 8 août 2009
  • Allen, T.F.H., Starr, T.B., 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Anselin, L., 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Asah, S.T., 2008. Empirical social-ecological system analysis: from theoretical framework to latent variable structural equation model, Environmental Management, 42, 1077-1090. [Google Scholar]
  • Baron, J.S., 2002. Rocky Mountain Futures: An Ecological Perspective, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Beek, K.J., Bannema, J., 1972. Land Evaluation for Agricultural Land Use Planning: An Ecological Methodology. Agricultural University, Department of Soil Sciences and Geology, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (Eds), 2003. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Berry, M., Flamm, R., Hazen, B., MacIntyre, R., 1996. LUCAS: A system for modeling land-use change, IEEE Computational Science Engineering, 3, 24-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., DeVelice, R.L., Jensen, M.E., 1994. Ecological theory in relation to landscape and ecosystem characterization, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), Volume II: Ecosystem Management: Principles and Applications. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-318, Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, 58-72. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., Jensen, M.E., Brown, B.A, 2001a. Integrated regional ecological assessments and land use planning, in Dale, V., Haeuber, R. (Eds), Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management, New York, Springer-Verlag, 276-315. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., Jensen, M.E., 2001b. General data collection and sampling design considerations for integrated regional ecological assessments, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 92-107. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Fortin, M.J., Humphries, H.C., 2001c. Elements of spatial data analysis in ecological assessments, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 187-199. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., Jensen, M.E., 2001d. Elements of ecological land classifications for ecological assessments, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 321-337. [Google Scholar]
  • Bousquet, F., LePage, C., 2004. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review, Ecological Modelling, 176, 313-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burhenne-Guilmin, F., Glowka, L., 1994. An introduction to the Convention on Biological Diversity, in Krattiger, A.F., McNeely, J.A., Lesser, W.H., Miller, K.R., St. Hill, Y., Senanayake, R. (Eds), Widening Perspectives on Biodiversity, Gland, IUCN/IAE, 15-19. Burrough, P.A., 1995. Spatial aspects of ecological data, in Jongman, R.H.G., Braak, C.J.F. ter, Van Tongeren, O.F.R. (Eds), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press, 213-251. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., 2001. Alternate states of ecosystems: Evidence and its implications for environmental decisions, in Press, M.C., Huntly, N., Levin, S. (Eds), Ecology: Achievement and Challenge, London, Blackwell Science Ltd, 357-383. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S., Brock, W., Hanson, P., 1999. Ecological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management, Conservation Ecology, 3, 2, 4 (http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art4). [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Gunderson, L.H., 2001. Coping with collapse: Ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management, BioScience, 51, 451-457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W.A., Ludwig, D., 2001a. Collapse, learning, and renewal, in Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press, 173-194. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B., Anderies, J.M., Abel., N., 2001b. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765-781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casetti, E., Jones, J.P. III, 1987. Spatial aspects of the productivity slow down: An analysis of US manufacturing data, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77, 76-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Christensen, W.F., Ameniya, Y., 2002. Latent variable analysis of multivariate spatial data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 302-317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., Wainger, L., Folke, C., Maler, K., 1993. Modeling complex ecological economic systems, BioScience, 43, 545-555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dale, V., Haeuber, R. (Eds), 2001. Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • English, M.R., Dale, V.H., Van Riper-Geibig, C., Hudson Ramsey, W., 1999. Overview, in Dale, V.H., English, M.R. (Eds), Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1-31. [Google Scholar]
  • Everett, R., Hessburg, P., Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S., 1994. Old forests and dynamic landscapes, Journal of Forestry, January issue, 22-25. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation, 32, Rome, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 1993. Guidelines for Land Use Planning, Rome, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B.H., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management, Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 557-581. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S., 1995. Barriers broken and bridges built: A synthesis, in Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S. (Eds), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, New York, Columbia University Press, 489-532. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds), 2001. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Guzy, M.R., Smith, C.L., Bolte, J.P., Hulse, D.W., Gregory, S.V., 2008. Policy research using agent-based modeling to assess future impacts of urban expansion into farmlands and forests, Ecology and Society, 13, 1, 37 (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art37/). [Google Scholar]
  • Haber, W., 1994. System ecological concepts for environmental planning, in Klijn, F. (Ed.), Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 49-67. [Google Scholar]
  • Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R.U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W.R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C.L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B., Zechmeister, H., 2006. From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research, Ecology and Society, 11, 2, 13 (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/). [Google Scholar]
  • Haeuber, R., 2001. Ecological assessments and implementing ecosystem management: Challenges, opportunities, and the road ahead, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 513-526. [Google Scholar]
  • Haining, R., 1990. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes, R.W., Graham, R.T., Quigley, T.M., 1996. A Framework for Ecosystem Management in the Interior Columbia Basin. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-374, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes, R.W., Quigley, T.M, 2001. Broad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia Basin example, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 179-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes, R.W., Quigley, T.M., Clifford, J.L., Gravenmier, R.A., 2001. Science and ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia Basin, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 3-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herring, M., 1998. Introduction, in Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M., Greene, S. (Eds), Bioregional Assessments, Washington, Island Press, 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S. (Ed.), 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, New York, John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change, in Clark, W.M., Munn, R.E. (Eds), Sustainable Development in the Biosphere, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 292-320. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems, Ecological Monographs, 62, 447-502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 2000. Theories for sustainable futures, Conservation Ecology, 4, 2, 7 (http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art7). [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems, Ecosystems, 4, 390-405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R, Brock, W.A., Gunderson, L.H., 2001. Discoveries for sustainable futures, in Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press, 395-418. [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P., Everett, R., Goodman, I., 1996. Ecosystem management: A landscape ecology perspective, Water Resources Bulletin, 32, 1-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), 2001. A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen, M.E., Christensen, N.L., Jr., Bourgeron, P.S., 2001. An overview of ecological assessment principles and applications, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 13-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson, B.L., 1999. The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies, Conservation Ecology, 3, 2, 8 (http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art8). [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M., Greene, S. (Eds), 1998. Bioregional Assessments, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore III, B., O'Riordan, T., Svedin, U., 2001. Environment and development: Sustainability science, Science, 292, 5517, 641-642. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kay, J.J., 1991. A nonequilibrium thermodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity, Environmental Management, 15, 483-495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingebiel, A.A., Montgomery, D.H., 1961. Land Capability Classification, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  • Knight, D.H., 1994. Mountains and Plains: The Ecology of Wyoming Landscape, New Haven, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lachowski, H.M., Johnson, V.C., 2001. Remote sensing applied to ecosystem management, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 135-150. [Google Scholar]
  • Lessard, G., 1995. A National Framework for Integrated Ecological Assessments, Washington, Federal InterAgency Working Group. [Google Scholar]
  • Lessard, G., Jensen, M.E., Crespi, M., Bourgeron, P.S., 1999. A national framework for integrated ecological assessments, in Cordel, H.K., Bergstrom, J.C. (Eds), Integrating Social Sciences with Ecosystem Management: Human Dimensions in Assessment Policy and Management, Champaign (IL), Sagamore Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Levin, S., 1999. Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons, Cambridge (MA), Perseus Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Lyndon, M.L., 1999. Characterizing the regulatory and judicial setting, in Dale, V.H., English, M.R. (Eds), Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making, New York, Springer-Verlag, 130-156. [Google Scholar]
  • Margerum, R.D., 1999. Integrated environmental management: The foundations for successful practice, Environmental Management, 24, 2, 151-166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • May, R., 1976. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Nature, 261, 459-467. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry, Washington, World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Morrison-Saunders, A., Bailey, J., 1999. Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship, Environmental Management, 24, 3, 281-295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • National Research Council (NRC), 1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, Washington, National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Olson, G.W., 1974. Land Classifications, Ithaca (NY), Cornell University. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill, R.V., King, A.W., 1998. Homage to St. Michael, or, why are there so many books on scale?, in Peterson, D.L., Parker, V.T. (Eds), Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications, New York, Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Parris, T.M., Kates, R.W., 2003. Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997a. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume I. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997b. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume II. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997c. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume III. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997d. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume IV. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Haynes, R.W., Hann, W.J., 2001. Estimating ecological integrity in the interior Columbia River basin, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 161-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Redman, C.L., Grove, J.M., Kuby, L.H., 2004. Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change, Ecosystems, 7, 161-171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson, N., 1992. International trends in environmental impact assessment, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 19, 3, 591-621. [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W.A., Holmgren, M., 2001a. Dynamic interaction of societies and ecosystems: Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology, in Gunderson, L.H. Holling, C.S. (Eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press, 195-240. [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B., 2001b. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 591-596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shea, K., the NCEAS Working Group on Population Management, 1998. Management of populations in conservation, harvesting, and control, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 371-375. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Slocombe, D.S., 1993a. Implementing ecosystem-based management, BioScience, 43, 9, 612-622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Slocombe, D.S., 1993b. Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development, Environmental Management, 17, 289-303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Slocombe, D.S., 2001. Integration of physical, biological and socio-economic information, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 119-132. [Google Scholar]
  • Spyratos, V., Bourgeron, P.S., Ghil, M., 2007. Development at the wildland-urban interface and the mitigation of forest-fire risk, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 14272-14276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Treweek, J., 1999. Ecological Impact Assessment, Oxford, Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
  • Underwood, A.J., 1995. Ecological research and (and research into) environmental management, Ecological Applications, 5, 1, 232-247. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1992. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001, Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F, Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • US Long Term Ecological Research Network (US LTER), 2007. The Decadal Plan for LTER: Integrative Science for Society and the Environment, Albuquerque (NM), LTER Network Office. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Leeuw, S.E., Aschan-Leygonie, C., 2005. A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems, in Liljenström, H., Svedin, U. (Eds), Micro-Meso-Macro: Addressing Complex Systems Couplings, London, World Scientific, 227-264. [Google Scholar]
  • Veblen, T.T., Kitzberger, T., Donnegan, J., 2000. Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range, Ecological Applications, 10, 4, 1178-1195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Venter, F.J., Naiman, R.J., Biggs, H.C., Pienaar, D.J., 2008. The evolution of conservation management philosophy: Science, environmental change and social adjustments in Kruger National Park, Ecosystems, 11, 2, 173-192. [Google Scholar]
  • Wackernagel, H., 1995. Multivariate Geostatistics, Berlin, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G., Pritchard, R., 2002. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach, Conservation Ecology, 6, 1, 14 (http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14). [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, B., Salt, D., 2006. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Walters, C.J., 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources, New York, McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. From One Earth to One World: An Overview, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Yaffee, S.L., Phillips, A., Frentz, I., Hardy, P., Maleki, S., Thorpe, B., 1996. Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Zonneveld, I.S., 1988. Basic principles of land evaluation using vegetation and other land attributes, in Kuchler, A.W., Zonneveld, I.S. (Eds), Vegetation Mapping, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 499-517. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.