Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 17, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2009
Page(s) 185 - 193
Section Actualités de la recherche
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2009031
Published online 08 August 2009
  • Allen, T.F.H., Starr, T.B., 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, Chicago, University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Anselin, L., 1988. Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Asah, S.T., 2008. Empirical social-ecological system analysis: from theoretical framework to latent variable structural equation model, Environmental Management, 42, 1077-1090. [Google Scholar]
  • Baron, J.S., 2002. Rocky Mountain Futures: An Ecological Perspective, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Beek, K.J., Bannema, J., 1972. Land Evaluation for Agricultural Land Use Planning: An Ecological Methodology. Agricultural University, Department of Soil Sciences and Geology, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C. (Eds), 2003. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Berry, M., Flamm, R., Hazen, B., MacIntyre, R., 1996. LUCAS: A system for modeling land-use change, IEEE Computational Science Engineering, 3, 24-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., DeVelice, R.L., Jensen, M.E., 1994. Ecological theory in relation to landscape and ecosystem characterization, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), Volume II: Ecosystem Management: Principles and Applications. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-318, Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, 58-72. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., Jensen, M.E., Brown, B.A, 2001a. Integrated regional ecological assessments and land use planning, in Dale, V., Haeuber, R. (Eds), Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management, New York, Springer-Verlag, 276-315. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., Jensen, M.E., 2001b. General data collection and sampling design considerations for integrated regional ecological assessments, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 92-107. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Fortin, M.J., Humphries, H.C., 2001c. Elements of spatial data analysis in ecological assessments, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 187-199. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourgeron, P.S., Humphries, H.C., Jensen, M.E., 2001d. Elements of ecological land classifications for ecological assessments, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 321-337. [Google Scholar]
  • Bousquet, F., LePage, C., 2004. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review, Ecological Modelling, 176, 313-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burhenne-Guilmin, F., Glowka, L., 1994. An introduction to the Convention on Biological Diversity, in Krattiger, A.F., McNeely, J.A., Lesser, W.H., Miller, K.R., St. Hill, Y., Senanayake, R. (Eds), Widening Perspectives on Biodiversity, Gland, IUCN/IAE, 15-19. Burrough, P.A., 1995. Spatial aspects of ecological data, in Jongman, R.H.G., Braak, C.J.F. ter, Van Tongeren, O.F.R. (Eds), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press, 213-251. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., 2001. Alternate states of ecosystems: Evidence and its implications for environmental decisions, in Press, M.C., Huntly, N., Levin, S. (Eds), Ecology: Achievement and Challenge, London, Blackwell Science Ltd, 357-383. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S., Brock, W., Hanson, P., 1999. Ecological and social dynamics in simple models of ecosystem management, Conservation Ecology, 3, 2, 4 (http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art4). [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Gunderson, L.H., 2001. Coping with collapse: Ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management, BioScience, 51, 451-457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W.A., Ludwig, D., 2001a. Collapse, learning, and renewal, in Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press, 173-194. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B., Anderies, J.M., Abel., N., 2001b. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4, 765-781. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casetti, E., Jones, J.P. III, 1987. Spatial aspects of the productivity slow down: An analysis of US manufacturing data, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 77, 76-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Christensen, W.F., Ameniya, Y., 2002. Latent variable analysis of multivariate spatial data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 302-317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., Wainger, L., Folke, C., Maler, K., 1993. Modeling complex ecological economic systems, BioScience, 43, 545-555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dale, V., Haeuber, R. (Eds), 2001. Applying Ecological Principles to Land Management, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • English, M.R., Dale, V.H., Van Riper-Geibig, C., Hudson Ramsey, W., 1999. Overview, in Dale, V.H., English, M.R. (Eds), Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1-31. [Google Scholar]
  • Everett, R., Hessburg, P., Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S., 1994. Old forests and dynamic landscapes, Journal of Forestry, January issue, 22-25. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation, 32, Rome, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 1993. Guidelines for Land Use Planning, Rome, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B.H., Scheffer, M., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., 2004. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management, Annual Review in Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 557-581. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S., 1995. Barriers broken and bridges built: A synthesis, in Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S., Light, S.S. (Eds), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, New York, Columbia University Press, 489-532. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds), 2001. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Guzy, M.R., Smith, C.L., Bolte, J.P., Hulse, D.W., Gregory, S.V., 2008. Policy research using agent-based modeling to assess future impacts of urban expansion into farmlands and forests, Ecology and Society, 13, 1, 37 (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art37/). [Google Scholar]
  • Haber, W., 1994. System ecological concepts for environmental planning, in Klijn, F. (Ed.), Ecosystem Classification for Environmental Management, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 49-67. [Google Scholar]
  • Haberl, H., Winiwarter, V., Andersson, K., Ayres, R.U., Boone, C., Castillo, A., Cunfer, G., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Freudenburg, W.R., Furman, E., Kaufmann, R., Krausmann, F., Langthaler, E., Lotze-Campen, H., Mirtl, M., Redman, C.L., Reenberg, A., Wardell, A., Warr, B., Zechmeister, H., 2006. From LTER to LTSER: Conceptualizing the socioeconomic dimension of long-term socioecological research, Ecology and Society, 11, 2, 13 (http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art13/). [Google Scholar]
  • Haeuber, R., 2001. Ecological assessments and implementing ecosystem management: Challenges, opportunities, and the road ahead, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 513-526. [Google Scholar]
  • Haining, R., 1990. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes, R.W., Graham, R.T., Quigley, T.M., 1996. A Framework for Ecosystem Management in the Interior Columbia Basin. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-374, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes, R.W., Quigley, T.M, 2001. Broad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia Basin example, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 179-188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes, R.W., Quigley, T.M., Clifford, J.L., Gravenmier, R.A., 2001. Science and ecosystem management in the Interior Columbia Basin, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 3-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herring, M., 1998. Introduction, in Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M., Greene, S. (Eds), Bioregional Assessments, Washington, Island Press, 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S. (Ed.), 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management, New York, John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: Local surprise and global change, in Clark, W.M., Munn, R.E. (Eds), Sustainable Development in the Biosphere, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 292-320. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 1992. Cross-scale morphology, geometry, and dynamics of ecosystems, Ecological Monographs, 62, 447-502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 2000. Theories for sustainable futures, Conservation Ecology, 4, 2, 7 (http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art7). [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems, Ecosystems, 4, 390-405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R, Brock, W.A., Gunderson, L.H., 2001. Discoveries for sustainable futures, in Gunderson, L.H., Holling, C.S. (Eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press, 395-418. [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P., Everett, R., Goodman, I., 1996. Ecosystem management: A landscape ecology perspective, Water Resources Bulletin, 32, 1-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), 2001. A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen, M.E., Christensen, N.L., Jr., Bourgeron, P.S., 2001. An overview of ecological assessment principles and applications, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 13-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson, B.L., 1999. The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies, Conservation Ecology, 3, 2, 8 (http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art8). [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson, K.N., Swanson, F., Herring, M., Greene, S. (Eds), 1998. Bioregional Assessments, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Kates, R.W., Clark, W.C., Corell, R., Hall, J.M., Jaeger, C.C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J.J., Schellnhuber, H.J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N.M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G.C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N.S., Kasperson, R.E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore III, B., O'Riordan, T., Svedin, U., 2001. Environment and development: Sustainability science, Science, 292, 5517, 641-642. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kay, J.J., 1991. A nonequilibrium thermodynamic framework for discussing ecosystem integrity, Environmental Management, 15, 483-495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingebiel, A.A., Montgomery, D.H., 1961. Land Capability Classification, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture. [Google Scholar]
  • Knight, D.H., 1994. Mountains and Plains: The Ecology of Wyoming Landscape, New Haven, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Lachowski, H.M., Johnson, V.C., 2001. Remote sensing applied to ecosystem management, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 135-150. [Google Scholar]
  • Lessard, G., 1995. A National Framework for Integrated Ecological Assessments, Washington, Federal InterAgency Working Group. [Google Scholar]
  • Lessard, G., Jensen, M.E., Crespi, M., Bourgeron, P.S., 1999. A national framework for integrated ecological assessments, in Cordel, H.K., Bergstrom, J.C. (Eds), Integrating Social Sciences with Ecosystem Management: Human Dimensions in Assessment Policy and Management, Champaign (IL), Sagamore Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Levin, S., 1999. Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons, Cambridge (MA), Perseus Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Lyndon, M.L., 1999. Characterizing the regulatory and judicial setting, in Dale, V.H., English, M.R. (Eds), Tools to Aid Environmental Decision Making, New York, Springer-Verlag, 130-156. [Google Scholar]
  • Margerum, R.D., 1999. Integrated environmental management: The foundations for successful practice, Environmental Management, 24, 2, 151-166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • May, R., 1976. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Nature, 261, 459-467. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry, Washington, World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Morrison-Saunders, A., Bailey, J., 1999. Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship, Environmental Management, 24, 3, 281-295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • National Research Council (NRC), 1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, Washington, National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Olson, G.W., 1974. Land Classifications, Ithaca (NY), Cornell University. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill, R.V., King, A.W., 1998. Homage to St. Michael, or, why are there so many books on scale?, in Peterson, D.L., Parker, V.T. (Eds), Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications, New York, Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Parris, T.M., Kates, R.W., 2003. Characterizing and measuring sustainable development, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559-586. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997a. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume I. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997b. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume II. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997c. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume III. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Arbelbide, S.J. (Eds), 1997d. An Assessment of Ecosystem Components in the Interior Columbia Basin and Portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Volume IV. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-405, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland. [Google Scholar]
  • Quigley, T.M., Haynes, R.W., Hann, W.J., 2001. Estimating ecological integrity in the interior Columbia River basin, Forest Ecology and Management, 153, 161-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Redman, C.L., Grove, J.M., Kuby, L.H., 2004. Integrating social science into the Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: Social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change, Ecosystems, 7, 161-171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson, N., 1992. International trends in environmental impact assessment, Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 19, 3, 591-621. [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer, M., Westley, F., Brock, W.A., Holmgren, M., 2001a. Dynamic interaction of societies and ecosystems: Linking theories from ecology, economy, and sociology, in Gunderson, L.H. Holling, C.S. (Eds), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems, Washington, Island Press, 195-240. [Google Scholar]
  • Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S., Foley, J.A., Folke, C., Walker, B., 2001b. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems, Nature, 413, 591-596. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shea, K., the NCEAS Working Group on Population Management, 1998. Management of populations in conservation, harvesting, and control, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 371-375. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Slocombe, D.S., 1993a. Implementing ecosystem-based management, BioScience, 43, 9, 612-622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Slocombe, D.S., 1993b. Environmental planning, ecosystem science, and ecosystem approaches for integrating environment and development, Environmental Management, 17, 289-303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Slocombe, D.S., 2001. Integration of physical, biological and socio-economic information, in Jensen, M.E., Bourgeron, P.S. (Eds), A Guidebook for Integrated Ecological Assessments, New York, Springer-Verlag, 119-132. [Google Scholar]
  • Spyratos, V., Bourgeron, P.S., Ghil, M., 2007. Development at the wildland-urban interface and the mitigation of forest-fire risk, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 14272-14276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Treweek, J., 1999. Ecological Impact Assessment, Oxford, Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
  • Underwood, A.J., 1995. Ecological research and (and research into) environmental management, Ecological Applications, 5, 1, 232-247. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1992. Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-92/001, Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F, Risk Assessment Forum, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • US Long Term Ecological Research Network (US LTER), 2007. The Decadal Plan for LTER: Integrative Science for Society and the Environment, Albuquerque (NM), LTER Network Office. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Leeuw, S.E., Aschan-Leygonie, C., 2005. A long-term perspective on resilience in socio-natural systems, in Liljenström, H., Svedin, U. (Eds), Micro-Meso-Macro: Addressing Complex Systems Couplings, London, World Scientific, 227-264. [Google Scholar]
  • Veblen, T.T., Kitzberger, T., Donnegan, J., 2000. Climatic and human influences on fire regimes in ponderosa pine forests in the Colorado Front Range, Ecological Applications, 10, 4, 1178-1195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Venter, F.J., Naiman, R.J., Biggs, H.C., Pienaar, D.J., 2008. The evolution of conservation management philosophy: Science, environmental change and social adjustments in Kruger National Park, Ecosystems, 11, 2, 173-192. [Google Scholar]
  • Wackernagel, H., 1995. Multivariate Geostatistics, Berlin, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., Lebel, L., Norberg, J., Peterson, G., Pritchard, R., 2002. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach, Conservation Ecology, 6, 1, 14 (http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14). [Google Scholar]
  • Walker, B., Salt, D., 2006. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Walters, C.J., 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources, New York, McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  • World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987. From One Earth to One World: An Overview, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Yaffee, S.L., Phillips, A., Frentz, I., Hardy, P., Maleki, S., Thorpe, B., 1996. Ecosystem Management in the United States: An Assessment of Current Experience, Washington, Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Zonneveld, I.S., 1988. Basic principles of land evaluation using vegetation and other land attributes, in Kuchler, A.W., Zonneveld, I.S. (Eds), Vegetation Mapping, Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 499-517. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.