Accès gratuit
Numéro
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 14, Numéro 2, Avril-Juin 2006
Page(s) 133 - 143
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2006018
Publié en ligne 13 juillet 2006
  • Alcamo, J., Kreileman, E., 1996. Emissions scenarios and global climate protection, Global Environmental Change, 6, 4, 305-334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., 2004. Amplitude et calendrier des politiques de réduction des émissions en réponse aux risques climatiques : leçons des modèles intégrés. Thèse en économie de l'environnement, EHESS, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., Hourcade, J.-C., Hallegatte, S., Lecocq, F., Dumas, P., Ha Duong, M., 2003. Optimal control models and elicitation of attitudes towards climate damages, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, 3, 133-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., Courtois, P., 2004. Impacts du changement climatique et modélisation intégrée, la part de l'arbitraire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 12, 4, 375-386. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., Rutherford, T.F., à paraître. Efficiency Gains from “What”-Flexibility in Climate Policy – An Integrated CGE Assessment, The Energy Journal. [Google Scholar]
  • Caldeira, K., Jain, A.K., Hoffert, M.I., 2003. Climate sensitivity uncertainty and the need for energy without CO2 emission, Science, 299, 5615, 2052-2054. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Council of the European Union, 2004. Press Release: 2632nd Council Meeting, Brussels (Belgium), Council of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • Den Elzen, M.G.J., Meinshausen, M., 2005a. Emission implications of long-term climate targets. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Den Elzen, M.G.J., Meinshausen, M., 2005b. Meeting the EU 2 °C climate target: global and regional emission implications, Bilthoven (the Netherlands), Netherlands Environemental Assessment Agency (MNP associated the RIVM). [Google Scholar]
  • ECF, 2004. What Is Dangerous Climate Change? Initial Results of a Symposium on Key Vulnerable Regions, Climate Change and Article 2 of the UNFCCC, ECF and PIK. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, 1996. Communication on Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, Brussels (Belgium), European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  • Ha Duong, M., Grubb, M., Hourcade, J.-C., 1997. Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement, Nature, 390, 270-274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hammitt, J.K., Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E., 1992. A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change, Nature, 357, 315-318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hare, B., Meinshausen, M., 2004. How Much Warming Are We Committed To and How Much Can Be Avoided?, Potsdam, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). [Google Scholar]
  • Hitz, S., Smith, J., 2004. Estimating global impacts from climate change, in Morlot, J.C., Agrawala, S. (Eds), The Benefits of Climate Change Policies: Analytical and Framework Issues, Paris, OECD, 31-82. [Google Scholar]
  • Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, P.J., Van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C.A. (Eds), 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • International Climate Change Taskforce, 2005. Meeting the Climate Challenge: Recommandations of the International Climate Change Taskforce. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC WGI, 2004. Workshop on Climate Sensitivity, Paris, IPCC. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly, D., Kolstad, C.D., Schlesinger, M.E., Andronova, N.G., 2000. Learning about Climate Sensitivity From the Instrumental Temperature Record. Working paper, available: http://homer.bus.miami.edu/~dkelly/papers/kksa.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Knutti, R., Stocker, T.F., Joos, F., Plattner, G.-K., 2003. Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks, Climate Dynamics, 21, 257-272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krause, F., Bach, W., Koomey, J., 1989. Energy policy in the greenhouse (Final report), in From Warming Fate to Warming Limit: Benchmarks for a Global Climate Convention, El Cerrito, International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths (IPSEP). [Google Scholar]
  • Kriegler, E., Bruckner, T., 2004. Sensitivity analysis of emissions corridors for the 21st century, Climatic Change, 66, 3, 345-387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecocq, F., 2000. Distribution spatiale et temporelle des coûts des politiques publiques sous incertitudes : théorie et pratique dans le cas de l'effet de serre. Thèse en sciences de l'environnement, ENGREF, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Leemans, R., Eickhout, B., 2004. Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change, Global Environmental Change, 14, 219-228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leemans, R., Van Vliet, A., 2005. Responses of species to changes in climate determine climate protection targets. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Lempert, R. J., 2002. A new decision sciences for complex systems, PNAS, 99, suppl. 3, 7309-7313. [Google Scholar]
  • Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E., Hammitt, J.K., 1994. The impact of potential abrupt climate changes on near-term policy choices, Climatic Change, 24, 351-376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E., 2001. Climate-change strategy needs to be robust, Nature, 412, 375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manne, A.S., Richels, R., 2005. Global climate decisions under uncertainty, International Energy Workshop 2005, Kyoto, Palulu Plaza Kyoto, 5-7 July. [Google Scholar]
  • Mastrandrea, M.D., Schneider, S.H., 2004. Probabilistic integrated assessment of `dangerous' climate change, Science, 304, 5670, 571-575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J., White, K. S. (Eds), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Meehl, G.A., Washington, M.A., Collins, W.D., Arblaster, J.M., Hu, A., Buja, L.E., Strand, W.G., Teng, H., 2005. How much more global warming and sea level rise?, Science, 307, 5716, 1769-1772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meinshausen, M., 2005. On the risk of overshooting +2 °C. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Metz, B., Ogunlade, D., Swart, R., Pan, J. (Eds), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • National Academies, 2003. Estimating Climate Sensitivity: Report of a workshop, Washington (DC), Steering Committee on Probabilistic Estimates of Climate Sensitivity, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division of Earth and Life Studies, the National Academies. [Google Scholar]
  • Nordhaus, W., Boyer, J.G., 2000. Warming the World: Economics Models of Climate Change, Cambridge, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill, B.C., Oppenheimer, M., 2004. Climate change impacts are sensitive to the concentration stabilisation path, PNAS, 1001, 47, 16411-16417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parry, M., Arnell, N., McMichael, T., Nicholls, R., Martens, P., Kovats, S., Livermore, M., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Fischer, G., 2001. Millions at Risk: defining critical climate change threats and targets, Global Environmental Change, 11, 181-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richels, R., Manne, A.S., Wigley, T.M.L., 2004. Moving Beyond Concentrations: The Challenge of Limiting Temperature Change. Document de travail 04-11, Washington (DC), AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. [Google Scholar]
  • Swart, R., Berk, M., Janssen, M., Kreileman, E., Leemans, R., 1998. The safe landing approach: risks and trade-offs in climate change, in Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., Kreileman, E. (Eds), Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century: Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model, Oxford, Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 193-218. [Google Scholar]
  • Toth, F.L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., 2003a. Integrated assessment of long-term climate policies: Part 1. Model Presentation, Climatic Change, 56, 1-2, 37-56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toth, F.L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., 2003b. Integrated assessment of long-term climate policies: Part 2. Model results and uncertainty analysis, Climatic Change, 56, 1-2, 57-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • UNFCCC, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  • Warren, R., 2005. Impacts of global climate change at different annual mean global temperature increases. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Wigley, T.M.L., 2005. The climate change commitment, Science, 307, 5716, 1766-1769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WWF, 2000. Global Warming and Terrestrial Biodiversity Decline, Gland, WWF. [Google Scholar]
  • Yohe, G., Andronova, N.G., Schlesinger, M.E., 2004. To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future?, Science, 306, 5695, 416-417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.