Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 14, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2006
Page(s) 133 - 143
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2006018
Published online 13 July 2006
  • Alcamo, J., Kreileman, E., 1996. Emissions scenarios and global climate protection, Global Environmental Change, 6, 4, 305-334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., 2004. Amplitude et calendrier des politiques de réduction des émissions en réponse aux risques climatiques : leçons des modèles intégrés. Thèse en économie de l'environnement, EHESS, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., Hourcade, J.-C., Hallegatte, S., Lecocq, F., Dumas, P., Ha Duong, M., 2003. Optimal control models and elicitation of attitudes towards climate damages, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, 3, 133-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ambrosi, P., Courtois, P., 2004. Impacts du changement climatique et modélisation intégrée, la part de l'arbitraire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 12, 4, 375-386. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Böhringer, C., Löschel, A., Rutherford, T.F., à paraître. Efficiency Gains from “What”-Flexibility in Climate Policy – An Integrated CGE Assessment, The Energy Journal. [Google Scholar]
  • Caldeira, K., Jain, A.K., Hoffert, M.I., 2003. Climate sensitivity uncertainty and the need for energy without CO2 emission, Science, 299, 5615, 2052-2054. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Council of the European Union, 2004. Press Release: 2632nd Council Meeting, Brussels (Belgium), Council of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • Den Elzen, M.G.J., Meinshausen, M., 2005a. Emission implications of long-term climate targets. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Den Elzen, M.G.J., Meinshausen, M., 2005b. Meeting the EU 2 °C climate target: global and regional emission implications, Bilthoven (the Netherlands), Netherlands Environemental Assessment Agency (MNP associated the RIVM). [Google Scholar]
  • ECF, 2004. What Is Dangerous Climate Change? Initial Results of a Symposium on Key Vulnerable Regions, Climate Change and Article 2 of the UNFCCC, ECF and PIK. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission, 1996. Communication on Community Strategy on Climate Change: Council Conclusions, Brussels (Belgium), European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  • Ha Duong, M., Grubb, M., Hourcade, J.-C., 1997. Influence of socioeconomic inertia and uncertainty on optimal CO2-emission abatement, Nature, 390, 270-274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hammitt, J.K., Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E., 1992. A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change, Nature, 357, 315-318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hare, B., Meinshausen, M., 2004. How Much Warming Are We Committed To and How Much Can Be Avoided?, Potsdam, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK). [Google Scholar]
  • Hitz, S., Smith, J., 2004. Estimating global impacts from climate change, in Morlot, J.C., Agrawala, S. (Eds), The Benefits of Climate Change Policies: Analytical and Framework Issues, Paris, OECD, 31-82. [Google Scholar]
  • Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, P.J., Van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C.A. (Eds), 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • International Climate Change Taskforce, 2005. Meeting the Climate Challenge: Recommandations of the International Climate Change Taskforce. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC WGI, 2004. Workshop on Climate Sensitivity, Paris, IPCC. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly, D., Kolstad, C.D., Schlesinger, M.E., Andronova, N.G., 2000. Learning about Climate Sensitivity From the Instrumental Temperature Record. Working paper, available: http://homer.bus.miami.edu/~dkelly/papers/kksa.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Knutti, R., Stocker, T.F., Joos, F., Plattner, G.-K., 2003. Probabilistic climate change projections using neural networks, Climate Dynamics, 21, 257-272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krause, F., Bach, W., Koomey, J., 1989. Energy policy in the greenhouse (Final report), in From Warming Fate to Warming Limit: Benchmarks for a Global Climate Convention, El Cerrito, International Project for Sustainable Energy Paths (IPSEP). [Google Scholar]
  • Kriegler, E., Bruckner, T., 2004. Sensitivity analysis of emissions corridors for the 21st century, Climatic Change, 66, 3, 345-387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lecocq, F., 2000. Distribution spatiale et temporelle des coûts des politiques publiques sous incertitudes : théorie et pratique dans le cas de l'effet de serre. Thèse en sciences de l'environnement, ENGREF, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Leemans, R., Eickhout, B., 2004. Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change, Global Environmental Change, 14, 219-228. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leemans, R., Van Vliet, A., 2005. Responses of species to changes in climate determine climate protection targets. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Lempert, R. J., 2002. A new decision sciences for complex systems, PNAS, 99, suppl. 3, 7309-7313. [Google Scholar]
  • Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E., Hammitt, J.K., 1994. The impact of potential abrupt climate changes on near-term policy choices, Climatic Change, 24, 351-376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lempert, R.J., Schlesinger, M.E., 2001. Climate-change strategy needs to be robust, Nature, 412, 375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manne, A.S., Richels, R., 2005. Global climate decisions under uncertainty, International Energy Workshop 2005, Kyoto, Palulu Plaza Kyoto, 5-7 July. [Google Scholar]
  • Mastrandrea, M.D., Schneider, S.H., 2004. Probabilistic integrated assessment of `dangerous' climate change, Science, 304, 5670, 571-575. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J., White, K. S. (Eds), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Meehl, G.A., Washington, M.A., Collins, W.D., Arblaster, J.M., Hu, A., Buja, L.E., Strand, W.G., Teng, H., 2005. How much more global warming and sea level rise?, Science, 307, 5716, 1769-1772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Meinshausen, M., 2005. On the risk of overshooting +2 °C. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Metz, B., Ogunlade, D., Swart, R., Pan, J. (Eds), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • National Academies, 2003. Estimating Climate Sensitivity: Report of a workshop, Washington (DC), Steering Committee on Probabilistic Estimates of Climate Sensitivity, Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate, Division of Earth and Life Studies, the National Academies. [Google Scholar]
  • Nordhaus, W., Boyer, J.G., 2000. Warming the World: Economics Models of Climate Change, Cambridge, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Neill, B.C., Oppenheimer, M., 2004. Climate change impacts are sensitive to the concentration stabilisation path, PNAS, 1001, 47, 16411-16417. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Parry, M., Arnell, N., McMichael, T., Nicholls, R., Martens, P., Kovats, S., Livermore, M., Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Fischer, G., 2001. Millions at Risk: defining critical climate change threats and targets, Global Environmental Change, 11, 181-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richels, R., Manne, A.S., Wigley, T.M.L., 2004. Moving Beyond Concentrations: The Challenge of Limiting Temperature Change. Document de travail 04-11, Washington (DC), AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. [Google Scholar]
  • Swart, R., Berk, M., Janssen, M., Kreileman, E., Leemans, R., 1998. The safe landing approach: risks and trade-offs in climate change, in Alcamo, J., Leemans, R., Kreileman, E. (Eds), Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century: Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model, Oxford, Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 193-218. [Google Scholar]
  • Toth, F.L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., 2003a. Integrated assessment of long-term climate policies: Part 1. Model Presentation, Climatic Change, 56, 1-2, 37-56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Toth, F.L., Bruckner, T., Füssel, H.-M., Leimbach, M., Petschel-Held, G., 2003b. Integrated assessment of long-term climate policies: Part 2. Model results and uncertainty analysis, Climatic Change, 56, 1-2, 57-75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • UNFCCC, 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [Google Scholar]
  • Warren, R., 2005. Impacts of global climate change at different annual mean global temperature increases. Communication au colloque Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change, Exeter (UK), DEFRA & Met Office, 1-3 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Wigley, T.M.L., 2005. The climate change commitment, Science, 307, 5716, 1766-1769. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • WWF, 2000. Global Warming and Terrestrial Biodiversity Decline, Gland, WWF. [Google Scholar]
  • Yohe, G., Andronova, N.G., Schlesinger, M.E., 2004. To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future?, Science, 306, 5695, 416-417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.