Open Access
Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 31, Number 2, Avril/Juin 2023
Dossier « Recherches sur la question animale : entre mobilisations sociétales et innovations technologiques »
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 188 - 198 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2023033 | |
Published online | 15 September 2023 |
- Beck U., 2001. La société du risque. Sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Paris, Aubier. Traduit de : Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem weg in eine andere moderne, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Bessy C., Chauvin P.-M., 2013. The power of market intermediaries. From information to valuation processes, Valuation Studies, 1, 1, 83-117, https://doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.131183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bessy C., Chauvin P.-M., 2014. Intermédiaires de marché, in Chauvin P.-M. (Ed.), Dictionnaire sociologique de l’entrepreneuriat, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po, 361-379, https://doi.org/10.3917/scpo.chauv.2015.01.0361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Boichard D., Guillaume F., Baur A., Croiseau P., Rossignol M.-N., Boscher M.-Y., Druet T., Genestout L., Colleau J.-J., Journaux L., Ducrocq V., Fritz S., 2012. Genomic selection in French dairy cattle, Animal Production Science, 52, 115-120, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN11119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bonneuil C., Hochereau F., 2008. Gouverner le « progrès génétique ». Biopolitique et métrologie de la construction d’un standard variétal dans la France agricole d’après-guerre, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 63, 6, 1305-1340, www.cairn.info/revue-annales-2008-6-page-1305.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd W., Scott Prudham W., Schurman R.A., 2001. Industrial dynamics and the problem of nature, Society & Natural Resources, 14, 7, 555-570, http://scottprudham.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Industrial-Dynamics-and-Nature.pdf. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Brown N., 2003. Hope against hype – Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures, Science & Technology Studies, 16, 2, 3-21, https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Callon M., 2017. L’emprise des marchés, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
- Callon M., Méadel C., Rabeharisoa V., 2000. L’économie des qualités, Politix, 13, 52, 211-239, https://doi.org/10.3406/polix.2000.1126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Castells M., 1996. The information age: economy, society and culture (Vol. I-III), Cambridge/Oxford, Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Chavinskaia L., 2020. La science fait de la résistance. Le rôle techno-politique d’une connaissance scientifique dans la globalisation de la sélection animale, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 14, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/rac.4262. [Google Scholar]
- Chavinskaia L., Loconto A., 2020. Keep diversity – Make standards! Spaces of standardization for diversity analyzed through cattle breeding industry, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 193-214, https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cornu P., Valceschini E., Maeght-Bournay O., 2018. L’histoire de l’Inra, entre science et politique, Versailles, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
- Denis B., 2016. Les vaches ont une histoire. Naissance des races bovines, Paris, Delachaux et Niestlé. [Google Scholar]
- Doré A., Michalon J., 2017. What makes human-animal relations ‘organizational’? The description of anthrozootechnical agencements, Organization, 24, 6, 761-780, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416670249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher R.A., 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance, Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh, 52, 2, 399-433, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0080456800012163. [Google Scholar]
- Gaillard C., Mougenot C., 2018. Les éleveurs de Montbéliarde au carrefour de l’innovation génomique : entre adhésion et résistance, solidarité et concurrence, Économie rurale. Agricultures, alimentations, territoires, 363, 23-37, https://doi.org/10.4000/economierurale.5393. [Google Scholar]
- Gibbs D., Holloway L., Gilna B., Morris C., 2009. Genetic techniques for livestock breeding: restructuring institutional relationships in agriculture, Geoforum, 40, 6, 1041-1049, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.07.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hayes B.J., Bowman P.J., Chamberlain A.J., Goddard M.E., 2009. Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges, Journal of Dairy Science, 92, 2, 433-443, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1646. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hickey J.M., 2013. Sequencing millions of animals for genomic selection 2.0, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 130, 331-332, https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Holloway L., Morris C., Gilna B., Gibbs D., 2009. Biopower, genetics and livestock breeding: (re)constituting animal populations and heterogeneous biosocial collectivities, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34, 394-407, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00347.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Huxley J.S., 2010 [ 1st ed. 1942]. Evolution: the modern synthesis, Cambridge/London, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ingold T., 2007. Materials against materiality, Archaeological Dialogues, 14, 1, 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203807002127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ingold T., 2012. Toward an ecology of materials, Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 1, 427-442, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-081309-145920. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kloppenburg J.R., 2005. First the seed: the political economy of plant biotechnology, University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar]
- Labatut J. 2017. Valuation of life: genetic models and the making of markets, Entreprises et Histoire, 88, 3, 89-102, https://doi.org/10.3917/eh.088.0089. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Labatut J., Tesnière G., 2017. La race bovine Holstein, institution de la modernisation de l’agriculture entre bien marchand et bien commun, in Allaire G., Daviron B. (Eds), Transformations agricoles et agroalimentaires. Entre écologie et capitalisme, Versailles, Quæ, 133-149, https://books.openedition.org/quae/21707. [Google Scholar]
- Labatut J., Aggeri F., Allaire G., 2013. Étudier les biens communs par les changements institutionnels : régimes de propriété autour des races animales face à l’innovation génomique, Revue de la régulation, 14, https://doi.org/10.4000/regulation.10529. [Google Scholar]
- Labatut J., Aggeri F., Bibe B., Girard N., 2011. Construire l’animal sélectionnable. Des régimes de sélection et de leurs transformations, Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, 5, 2, 302-336, https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.013.0302. [Google Scholar]
- Labatut J., Aggeri F., Girard N., 2012. Discipline and change: how technologies and organizational routines interact in new practice creation, Organization Studies, 33, 39-69, https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611430589. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Latour B., 1997 [1re ed. 1991]. Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
- Mayaud J.-L., 1991. 150 ans d’excellence agricole en France. Histoire du Concours général agricole, Paris, Pierre Belfond. [Google Scholar]
- Meuwissen T.H.E., Hayes B.J., Goddard M.E., 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps, Genetics, 157, 4, 1819-1829, https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moriceau J.-M., 2005. Histoire et géographie de l’élevage français : du Moyen Âge à la Révolution, Paris, Fayard. [Google Scholar]
- Muller P., 2015. Le technocrate et le paysan : Les lois d’orientation agricole de 1960-1962 et la modernisation de l’agriculture française 1945-1984, Paris, L’Harmattan. [Google Scholar]
- Orland B., 2004. Turbo-cows: producing a competitive animal in the nineteenth and early twentieth century, in Schrepfer S.R., Scranton P. (Eds), Industrializing organisms: introducing evolutionary history, London, Routledge, 167-189. [Google Scholar]
- Parry B., 2015. A bull market? Devices of qualification and singularisation in the international marketing of US sperm, in Parry B., Greenhough B., Brown T., Dyck I. (Eds), Bodies across borders. The global circulation of body parts, medical tourists and professionals, Farnham/Burlington, Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
- Polanyi K., 1983. La Grande transformation. Aux origines politiques et économiques de notre temps, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
- Quinn M.S., 1993. Corpulent cattle and milk machines: nature, art and the ideal type, Society & Animals, 1, 2, 145-157, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853093x00046. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ritvo H., 1995. Possessing mother nature: genetic capital in 18th century Britain, in Brewer J., Staves S. (Eds), Early modern conceptions of property, London, Routledge, 413-426. [Google Scholar]
- Selmi A., Joly P.-B., 2014. Les régimes de production des connaissances de la sélection animale. Ontologies, mesures, formes de régulation, Sociologie du travail, 56, 2, 225-244, https://doi.org/10.4000/sdt.3775. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Simondon G., 1958. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques, Paris, Aubier-Montaigne. [Google Scholar]
- Strasser B.J., 2012. Data-driven sciences: from wonder cabinets to electronic databases, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 1, 85-87, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas N, 1991. Entangled objects: exchange, material culture, and colonialism in the Pacific, Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Vissac B., 2002. Les vaches de la République : saisons et raisons d’un chercheur citoyen, Versailles, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
- Weiner A.B., 1994. Cultural difference and the density of objects, American Ethnologist, 21, 2, 391-403, https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1994.21.2.02a00090. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.