Open Access
Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 31, Number 2, Avril/Juin 2023
Dossier « Recherches sur la question animale : entre mobilisations sociétales et innovations technologiques »
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 179 - 187 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2023031 | |
Published online | 08 August 2023 |
- Aubert B.A., Schroeder A., Grimaudo J., 2012. IT as enabler of sustainable farming: an empirical analysis of farmers’ adoption decision of precision agriculture technology, Decision Support Systems, 54, 510-520, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.07.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Aubron C., Noël L., Lasseur J., 2016. Labor as a driver of changes in herd feeding patterns: Evidence from a diachronic approach in Mediterranean France and lessons for agroecology, Ecological Economics, 127, 68-79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.02.013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Azima S., Mundler P., 2022. Does direct farm marketing fulfill its promises? Analyzing job satisfaction among direct-market farmers in Canada, Agriculture and Human Values, 39, 791-807, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10289-9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bellon-Maurel V., Luuton E., Bisquert P., Brossard L., Chambaron-Ginhac S., Labarthe P., Lagacherie P., Martignac F., Molenat J., Parisey N., Picault S., Piot-Lepetit I, Veissier I, 2022. Digital revolution for the agroecological transition of food systems: a responsible research and innovation perspective, Agricultural Systems, 2022, 203, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103524. [Google Scholar]
- Bendahan A.B., Poccard-Chapuis R., De Medeiros D., Lucena Costa L. (de), Tourrand J.-F., 2018. Management and labour in an integrated crop-livestock-forestry system in Roraima, Brazilian Amazonia, Cahiers Agricultures, 27, 2, https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018014. [Google Scholar]
- Bocquier F., Debus N., Lurette A., Maton C., Viudes G., Moulin C.-H., Jouven M., 2014. Élevage de précision en systèmes d’élevage peu intensifiés, INRAE Productions Animales, 27, 2, 101-112, https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2014.27.2.3058. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bournigal J.-M., Houllier F., Lecouvey P., Pringuet P. (Eds), 2015. 30 projets pour une agriculture compétitive et respectueuse de l’environnement. Rapport Innovation Agriculture 2025, ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, et le ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Agroalimentaire et de la Forêt, Paris, https://agriculture.gouv.fr/agriculture-innovation-2025-des-orientations-pour-une-agriculture-innovante-et-durable. [Google Scholar]
- Bouttes M., Bancarel A., Doumayzel S., Viguié S., San Cristobal M., Martin G., 2020. Conversion to organic farming increases dairy farmers’ satisfaction independently of the strategies implemented, Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture, 40, 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00616-5. [Google Scholar]
- Brossard L., Allain C., Menassol J.B., 2022. How can precision livestock farming contribute to the principles of agroecology? Annales des Mines, 19, https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03772924. [Google Scholar]
- Caquet T., Gascuel C., Tixier-Boichard M. (Eds), 2020. Agroécologie. Des recherches pour la transition des filières et des territoires, Versailles, éditions Quae. [Google Scholar]
- Coquil X., Béguin P., Dedieu B., 2014. Transition to self-sufficient mixed crop-dairy farming systems, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 29, 195-205, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170513000458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Compagnone C., Lamine C., Dupré L., 2018. La production et la circulation des connaissances en agriculture interrogées par l’agro-écologie, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 12, 2, 111-138, https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.039.0111. [Google Scholar]
- Cournut S., Teyssier E., Chauvat S., 2018. Prise en compte du travail dans la production de références en élevage biologique. Rencontre Recherche Ruminant, Paris, 283, https://uca.hal.science/hal-02088660/document. [Google Scholar]
- Dumont A.M., Baret P.V., 2017. Why working conditions are a key issue of sustainability in agriculture? A comparison between agroecological, organic and conventional vegetable systems, Journal of Rural Studies, 56, 53-64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Dumont B, Fortun-Lamothe L, Jouven M, Thomas M, Tichit M., 2013. Prospects from agroecology and industrial ecology for animal production in the 21st century, Animal, 7, 6, 1028-1043, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112002418. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dumont B., Groot J.C.J., Tichit M., 2018. Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future? Animal, 12, 52, 210-219, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001350. [Google Scholar]
- Duval J., Blanchonnet A., Hostiou N., 2021a. How agroecological farming practices reshape cattle farmers’ working conditions, Agroecology and sustainable food systems, 1480-1499, https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2021.1957062. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Duval J., Cournut S., Hostiou N., 2021b. Livestock farmers’ working conditions in agroecological farming systems. A review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 41, 22, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00679-y. [Google Scholar]
- Faverdin P., Allain C., Guatteo R., Hostiou N., Veissier I., 2020. Élevage de précision : de nouvelles informations utiles pour la décision ? INRAE Productions Animales, 33, 4, 223-234, https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2020.33.4.4585. [Google Scholar]
- Forget V., Depeyrot J.N., Midler E., Hugonnet M., Beaujeu R., Grandjean A., Hérault B. (Eds), 2019. Actif’Agri, transformations des emplois et des activités en agriculture, Paris, La documentation française. [Google Scholar]
- Ganascia J.-G., 2017. Le Mythe de la singularité. Faut-il craindre l’intelligence artificielle ? Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Gargiulo J.I., Eastwood C.R., Garcia S.C., Lyons N.A., 2018. Dairy farmers with larger herd sizes adopt more precision dairy technologies, Journal of Dairy Science, 101, 6, 5466-5473, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Girard N., Magda D., 2020. The interplays between singularity and genericity of agroecological knowledge in a network of livestock farmers, Journal of Rural Studies, 73, 214-224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gliessman S., 2014 [3e édition]. Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food systems, Taylor and Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17881. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hostiou N., Fagon J., Chauvat S., Turlot A., Kling-Éveillard F., Boivin X., Allain C., 2017. Impact of Precision Livestock Farming on work and human-animal interactions on dairy farms. A review, Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement, 21, 4, 268-275, https://doi.org/10.25518/1780-4507.13706. [Google Scholar]
- Ingrand S., 2018. Opinion paper: ‘monitoring te salutant’: combining digital sciences and agro-ecology to design multi-performant livestock farming systems, Animal, 12, 1, 2-3, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001999. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jacquot A.L., Duval J., Gerard M, Hostiou N., 2020. Quels effets sur le travail des éleveurs bovins laitiers de l’adoption de pratiques agroécologiques dans l’Ouest de la France ? 25, Rencontres Recherches Ruminants, Paris, 2020, 565-569, https://hal.science/hal-03199122/file/Jacquot_2021.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Jansen K., 2000. Labour, Livelihoods and the quality of life in organic agriculture in Europe, Biological agriculture and horticulture, 17, 3, 247-278, https://doi.org/10.1080/01448765.2000.9754845. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jeanneaux P., 2018. Agriculture numérique : quelles conséquences sur l’autonomie de la décision des agriculteurs ? Agronomie, environnement et sociétés, 8, 1, 13-22, https://agronomie.asso.fr/aes-8-1-3. [Google Scholar]
- Lamine C., Magda D., Rivera-Ferre M., Marsden T. (Eds), 2021 Agroecological transitions, between determinist and open-ended visions, Bruxelles, Peter Lang, https://www.peterlang.com/document/1114400. [Google Scholar]
- Lebrun M., 2020. Agriculture de précision et transition agroécologique des exploitations : regards croisés des acteurs du monde agricole. Mémoire de master AgroCampus Ouest, Institut Agro, Rennes, https://hal.insa-toulouse.fr/VETAGRO-TERRITOIRES/hal-03280860v1. [Google Scholar]
- Lovarelli D, Bacenetti J, Guarino M., 2020. A review on dairy cattle farming: Is precision livestock farming the compromise for an environmental, economic, and social sustainable production? Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lusson J.-M., Coquil X., 2016. Transitions vers des systèmes autonomes et économes en intrants avec élevages de bovins : freins, motivations, apprentissages, Innovations Agronomiques, 49, 353-364, https://doi.org/10.15454/1.4622868226062979E12. [Google Scholar]
- Martin T., Gasselin P., Hostiou N., Feron G., Laurens L., Purseigle F., 2022. Robots and transformations of work in farm: a systematic review of the literature and a research agenda, Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture, 42, 66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00796-2. [Google Scholar]
- Menassol J.B., Grisot P.G., Guinamard C., Llaria A., Jouven M., 2021. Des outils numériques centrés sur le comportement des animaux pour assister la conduite du pâturage sur parcours, Fourrages, 245, 41-51, https://afpf-asso.fr/article/des-outils-numeriques-centres-sur-le-comportement-des-animaux-pour-assister-la-conduite-du-paturage-sur-parcours. [Google Scholar]
- Meuret M, Tichit M, Hostiou N., 2013. Élevage et pâturage « de précision » : l’animal sous surveillance électronique, Courrier de l’Environnement, 63, 13-24, https://hal.science/hal-01137197/. [Google Scholar]
- Meynard J.-M., Messéan A., Charlier A., Charrier F., Fares M., Le Bail M., Magrini M.-B., Savini I., 2013. Freins et leviers à la diversification des cultures : étude au niveau des exploitations agricoles et des filières, OCL, 20, 4, https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2013007. [Google Scholar]
- Migliorini P., Bàrberi P., Bellon S., Tommaso G., Gkisakis V.-D., Peeters A., Wezel A., 2020. Controversial topics in agroecology: A European perspective, International Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 47, 3, 159-173, https://doi.org/10.7764/ijanr.v47i3.2265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Morgan-Davies C., Lambe N., Wishart H., Waterhouse T., Kenyon F., McBean D., McCracken D., 2018. Impacts of using a precision livestock system targeted approach in mountain sheep flocks, Livestock Science, 208, 67-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.12.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mougenot C., Petit S., Gaillard C., 2020. Le « coup d’œil » de l’éleveur est-il menacé par l’élevage de précision ? Activités, 17, 2, 22, https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.5693. [Google Scholar]
- Nowak B., 2021. Precision agriculture: where do we stand? A review of the adoption of precision agriculture technologies on field crops farms in developed countries, Agricultural Research, 10, 515-522, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-021-00539-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Odintsov Vaintrub M., Levit H., Chincarinii M., Fusaro I., Giammarco M.,Vignola G., 2020. Review: Precision livestock farming, automats and new technologies: possible applications in extensive dairy sheep farming, Animal, 15, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100143. [Google Scholar]
- Oudshoorn F.W., Kristensen T., Van Der Zijpp A.J., Boer I.J.M. (de), 2012. Sustainability evaluation of automatic and conventional milking systems on organic dairy farms in Denmark, NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 59, 1, 25-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2011.05.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Paustian M., Theuvsen L., 2017. Adoption of precision agriculture technologies by German crop farmers, Precision Agriculture, 18, 701-716, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-016-9482-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ribier V., Griffon M., 2005. Quelles politiques agricoles pour accompagner la transition vers l’agro-écologie ?, in Déméter 2006 : économie et stratégies agricoles, Club Déméter. Paris : Club, 145-163. [Google Scholar]
- Reichardt M., Jürgens C., 2009. Adoption and future perspective of precision farming in Germany: Results of several surveys amongst different agricultural target groups, Precision Agriculture, 10, 73-94, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9101-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rose D.C., Wheeler R., Winter M., Lobley M., Chivers C.A., 2021. Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet, Land Use Policy, 100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933. [Google Scholar]
- Ryschawy J., Martin G., Moraine M., Duru M., Theron O., 2017. Designing crop-livestock integration at different levels: toward new agroecological models? Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 108, 5-20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-016-9815-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Salembier C., Segrestin B., Sinoir N., Templier J., Weill B., Meynard J.-M., 2020. Design of equipment for agroecology: coupled innovation processes led by farmer-designers, Agricultural Systems, 183, 13, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Servière G., Chauvat S., Hostiou N., Cournut S., 2019. Le travail en élevage et ses mutations, INRAE Productions Animales, 32, 1, 13-24, https://doi.org/10.20870/productions-animales.2019.32.1.2418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Timmermann C., Félix G.F., 2015. Agroecology as a vehicle for contributive justice, Agriculture and Human Values, 32, 523-538, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-014-9581-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wezel A., Bellon S., Doré T., Francis C., Vallod D., 2009. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice, a review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 503-515, https://doi.org/10.1051/agro/2009004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.