Bioéconomie : un retour historique sur deux problématisations de l’usage des ressources renouvelables

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 28, Number 3-4, Juillet/Décembre 2020


Page(s)		216 - 225
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021011
Published online		30 March 2021

Abrams D., 2008. George Washington Carver: scientist and educator, New York, Chelsea House. [Google Scholar]
Achilladelis B., Schwarzkopf A., Cines M., 1990. The dynamics of technological innovation: the case of the chemical industry, Research Policy, 19, 1, 1-34, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(90)90032-2. [Google Scholar]
Ancori B., Cohendet P. (Eds), 1984. La chimie en Europe : innovations, mutations et perspectives, Paris, Économica. [Google Scholar]
Barrère C., 2007. Vers une théorie économique substantiviste du patrimoine, Économie Appliquée, 3, 7-30. [Google Scholar]
Beckert J., 2013. Capitalism as a system of expectations: toward a sociological microfoundation of political economy, Politics & Society, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032329213493750. [Google Scholar]
Beckert J., 2016. Imagined futures: fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
Béfort N., 2016. Pour une mésoéconomie de l’émergence de la bioéconomie : représentations, patrimoines productifs collectifs et stratégies d’acteurs dans la régulation d’une chimie doublement verte. Thèse de doctorat en sciences économiques, Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne. [Google Scholar]
Béfort N., Nieddu M., 2017. De la variété des ancrages territoriaux des firmes en Chimie Doublement Verte, Géographie, Économie, Société, 19, 1, 133–152. [Google Scholar]
Borup M., Brown N., Konrad K., Van Lente H., 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, 3-4, 285-298, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002. [Google Scholar]
Boyer R., 2018. Expectations, narratives, and socio-economic regimes, in Beckert J., Bronk R. (Eds), Uncertain futures. Imaginaries, narratives, and calculation in the economy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 39-61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820802.003.0002. [Google Scholar]
Bozell J.J., Petersen G.R., 2010. Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates-the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited, Green Chemistry, 12, 539-554, http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/B922014C. [Google Scholar]
Cherubini F., Jungmeier G., Wellisch M., Willke T., Skiadas I., Van Ree R., de Jong E., 2009. Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 3, 5, 534-546, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bbb.172. [Google Scholar]
Chesnais F., 1981. Biotechnologie et modifications des structures de l’industrie chimique : quelques points de repère, Revue d’économie industrielle, 18, 218-230, http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rei.1981.1112. [Google Scholar]
Cheung H., Tanke R.S., Torrence G.P., 2011. Acetic Acid, in Elvers B. (Ed.), Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH, https://doi.org/10.1002/14356007.a01_045.pub2. [Google Scholar]
Cohendet P., 1982. L’industrie chimique européenne et la crise, la nécessité des mutations technologiques, Futuribles, 60, 13–31. [Google Scholar]
Cohendet P., Ledoux M.-J., Zuscovitch E., 1987. Les matériaux nouveaux : dynamique économique et stratégie européenne, Paris, Économica. [Google Scholar]
Colonna P., Tayeb J., Valceschini E., 2015. Les nouveaux usages de la biomasse, in Le Déméter 2015, Paris, Club Déméter éditeur, 275–305. [Google Scholar]
Danielou G., Broun G., 1981. Bioindustrie : de la tradition artisanale à la pratique industrielle, Revue d’économie industrielle, 18, 14-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rei.1981.1088. [Google Scholar]
European Commission, 2012. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, in Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 9-17. [Google Scholar]
Finlay M.R., 1997. the failure of chemurgy in the depression-era south: the case of Jesse F. Jackson and the Central of Georgia Railroad, The Georgia Historical Quarterly, 81, 1, 78-102. [Google Scholar]
Finlay M.R., 2003. Old efforts at new uses: a brief history of chemurgy and the American search for biobased materials, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7, 3-4, 33-46. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1162/108819803323059389. [Google Scholar]
Galambos L., Hikino T., Zamagni V. (Eds), 2007. The global chemical industry in the age of the petrochemical revolution, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Joly P.-B., 2010. On the economics of techno-scientific promises, in Akrich M., Barthe Y., Muniesa F. (Eds), Débordements. Mélanges offerts à Michel Callon, Paris, Presse des Mines, 203-221, http://books.openedition.org/pressesmines/747. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jullien B., Smith A., 2012. Le gouvernement d’une industrie. Vers une économie politique institutionnaliste renouvelée, Gouvernement et action publique, 1, 103-123, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/gap.121.0103. [Google Scholar]
Langeveld H., Meeusen M., Sanders J. (Eds), 2010. The biobased economy: biofuels, materials and chemicals in the post-oil era, London/Washington (DC), Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
Levidow L., Birch K., Papaioannou T., 2013. Divergent paradigms of European agro-food innovation: the knowledge-based bio-economy (KBBE) as an R&D agenda, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38, 1, 94-125, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243912438143. [Google Scholar]
Lokko Y., Heijde M., Schebesta K., Scholtès P., Van Montagu M., Giacca M., 2018. Biotechnology and the bioeconomy—towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development, New Biotechnology, 40, Part A, 5-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Morone P., Falcone P.M., Lopolito A., 2019. How to promote a new and sustainable food consumption model: a fuzzy cognitive map study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 563-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.075. [Google Scholar]
Nieddu M., 2013. Évaluation et changement technologique : réflexions sur le cas des agromatériaux, in Vivien F.-D., Lepart J., Marty P. (Eds), L’évaluation de la durabilité, Paris, Quæ, 175-190, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/quae.vivie.2013.01.0175. [Google Scholar]
Nieddu M., Garnier E., Bliard C., 2010. L’émergence d’une chimie doublement verte, Revue d’économie industrielle, 132, 4, 53-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rei.4355. [Google Scholar]
Nieddu M., Garnier E., Bliard C., 2014. Patrimoines productifs collectifs versus exploration/exploitation. Le cas de la bioraffinerie, Revue économique, 65, 6, 957-987, http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/reco.pr2.0031. [Google Scholar]
Nieddu M., Vivien F.-D., Garnier E., Bliard C., 2014. Existe-t-il réellement un nouveau paradigme de la chimie verte ? Natures Sciences Sociétés, 22, 2, 103-113, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2014022. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Penasse L., 1981. Perspectives et contraintes de la bioindustrie, Revue d’économie industrielle, 18, 30-37, http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rei.1981.1089. [Google Scholar]
Permeswaran P., 2010. Chemurgy: using science innovatively to save American agriculture from overproduction, The History Teacher, 44, 1, 95–125. [Google Scholar]
Pursell C.W., 1969. The Farm Chemurgic Council and the United States Department of Agriculture, 1935-1939, Isis, 60, 3, 307-317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/350500. [Google Scholar]
Sawatdeenarunat C., Nguyen D., Surendra K.C., Shrestha S., Rajendran K., Oechsner H., Xie L., Khanal S.K., 2016. Anaerobic biorefinery: current status, challenges, and opportunities, Bioresource Technology, 215, 304-313, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.074. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shurtleff W., Aoyagi A. (Eds), 2011. Henry Ford and his researchers: history of their work with soybeans, soyfoods and chemurgy (1928-2011): extensively annotated bibliography and sourcebook, Lafayette (CA), Soyinfo Center, www.soyinfocenter.com/pdf/145/Ford.PDF. [Google Scholar]
Staffas L., Gustavsson M., McCormick K., 2013. Strategies and policies for the bioeconomy and bio-based economy: an analysis of official national approaches, Sustainability, 5, 6, 2751-2769, http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su5062751. [Google Scholar]
Van Laer A., 2010. Vers une politique de recherche commune : du silence du traité CEE au titre de l’Acte Unique, in Bouneau C., Burigana D., Varsori A. (Eds), Trends in technological innovation and the European construction: the emerging of enduring dynamics?, Brussels, Peter Lang, 79-100. [Google Scholar]
Vivien F.-D., Nieddu M., Befort N., Debref R., Giampietro M., 2019. The hijacking of the bioeconomy, Ecological Economics, 159, 189-197, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027. [Google Scholar]
Werpy T., Petersen G., 2004. Top value added chemicals from biomass, vol. 1, US Department of Energy, p. 76, http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/15008859. [Google Scholar]
White H.C., Godart F., Corona V., 2008. Produire en contexte d’incertitude. La construction des identités et des liens sociaux dans les marchés, Sciences de la Société, 73, 17–40. [Google Scholar]
Zitt M., 1983. Un cas d’innovation : l’isoglucose, Économie rurale, 158, 42-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1983.3010. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.