EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 23 (2015) Supplément 2015 Nat. Sci. Soc., 23 (2015) S41-S51 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 23, 2015
Les enjeux de la conférence de Paris. Penser autrement la question climatique
Page(s) S41 - S51
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015017
Publié en ligne 22 juin 2015
  • Ambrosi, P., Hourcade, J.-C., Hallegatte, S., Lecocq, F., Dumas, P., Ha-Duong, M., 2003. Optimal control models and elicitation of attitudes towards climate damages, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, 3, 133-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, S.T., Parry, I.W., James, H., Sallee, M., Fischer, C., 2011. Automobile Fuel Economy Standards: Impacts, Efficiency, and Alternatives, Review of Environmental Economic and Policy, 5, 1, 89-108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2015. Gouverner le Climat ? Vingt ans de négociations internationales, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po. [Google Scholar]
  • Barker, T., Johnstone, N., O’Shea, T., 1993. The CEC Carbon/Energy Tax and Secondary Transport Related Benefits. Energy-Environment-Economy Modelling Discussion Paper No. 5, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Bodansky, D., Diringer, E., 2014. Evolution of the International Climate Effort, Arlington, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. [Google Scholar]
  • Bussolo, M., O’Connor, D., 2001. Clearing the Air in India: The Economics of Climate Policy with Ancillary Benefits. Working Paper No. 182, OCDE, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke, L., Jiang, K. Akimoto, K., Babiker, M., Blanford, G., Fisher-Vanden, K., Hourcade, J.-C., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Löschel, A., McCollum, D., Paltsev, S., Rose, S., Shukla, P. R., Tavoni, M., van der Zwaan, B.C.C., van Vuuren, D.P., 2014. Assessing Transformation Pathways, in Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. Sokona, Y. Farahani, E. Kadner, S. Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds)], Cambridge (UK), New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Combet, E., 2013. Fiscalité carbone et progrès social : application au cas français. Thèse de doctorat, EHESS, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Complainville, C., Martins, J., 1994. NOx/SOx Emissions and Carbon Abatement. Working Papers No. 151, OECD Economics Department, OECD Publishing (online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/345333447174). [Google Scholar]
  • Damian, M., 2014. La politique climatique change enfin de paradigme, Économie Appliquée, 17, 1, 37-72. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubash, N.K., 2013. The politics of climate change in India: Narratives of equity and cobenefits, Wiley Interdisciplinary Review of Climate Change, 4, 3, 191-201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dubash, N.K., Raghunandan, D., Sant, G., Sreenivas, A., 2013. Indian climate change policy: exploring a co-benefits based approach, Economic and Political Weekly, 48, 22, 47-61. [Google Scholar]
  • Garbaccio, R.F., Ho, M.S., Jorgenson, D.W., 1999. Controlling carbon emissions in China, Environment and Development Economics, 4, 4, 493-518. [Google Scholar]
  • Glomsrød, S., Vennemo, H., Johnsen, T., 1992. Stabilization of emissions of CO2: A computable general equilibrium assessment, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 1, 53-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goulder, L.H., 1995. Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157-183. [Google Scholar]
  • Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., Brack, D., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A guide and Assessment, London, RIIA/Earthscan, Washington, Brookings. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta, J., 2014. The History of Global Climate Governance, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., Mathy, S., 2008. Untying the climate - Development Gordian knot: Economic options in a politically constrained world, in Guesnerie, R., Tulkens, H., The Design of Climate Policy, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., 2013. Triggering the low-carbon transition in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, Climate Policy, 13, Supplement 1: Low carbon drivers for a sustainable world, 22-35. [Google Scholar]
  • IIASA, 2012. Global Energy Assessment (GEA): Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 1996. Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge (UK), New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2007. Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2013. The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. Sokona, Y. Farahani, E. Kadner, S. Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds)], Cambridge (UK) and New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Krupnick, A., Burtraw, D., Markandya, A., 2000. The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: A conceptual framework, in OECD (Ed.), Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Paris, 53-93. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecocq, F., 2015. L’évaluation des politiques climatiques à l’échelle globale et nationale, in Torquebiau, E. (Ed.), Changer d’habitudes : changement climatique et agriculture du monde, Versailles, Quae, 279-291. [Google Scholar]
  • Markandya, A., Rübbelke, D.T.G., 2004. Ancillary benefits of climate policy, Journal of Economics and Statistics, 224, 4, 488-503. [Google Scholar]
  • Markandya, A., Armstrong, B.-G., Hales, S., Chiabai, A., Criqui, P., Mima, S., Tonne, C., Wilkinson, P., 2009. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Low-carbon electricity generation, The Lancet, 374, 9706, 2006-2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollum, D.L., Krey, V., Riahi, K., 2011. An integrated approach to energy sustainability, Nature Climate Change, 1, 9, 428-29. [Google Scholar]
  • McCollum, D.L., Krey, V., Riahi, K., Kolp, P., Grubler, A., 2013. Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges, Climatic Change, 119, 2, 479-94. [Google Scholar]
  • OECD, 2000. Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Paris, OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Connor, D., Zhai, F., Aunan, K., Berntsen, T., Vennemo, H., 2003. Agricultural and Human Health Impacts of Climate Policy in China: A General Equilibrium Analysis with Special Reference to Guandong. Responding to Local and Global Environmental Challenges, Paris, OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 1976. Limits of cost-benefit analysis as a guide to environmental policy, Kyklos, 29, 1, 97-112. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 1992. Secondary benefits of greenhouse gas control. CSERGE Working Paper, No 92-12, University of East Anglia and University College London, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 2000. Policy framework for the ancillary benefits of climate change policies, in OECD (Ed.), Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Paris, 517-560. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 2001. Controversies in environmental valuation, in McMahon, P., Moran, D. (Ed.), Economic Valuation of Water Resources: Policy and Practice, London, Terence Dalton, 49-63. [Google Scholar]
  • Riahi, K., Dentener, F., Gielen, D., Grubler, A., Jewell, J., 2012. Chapter 17: Energy pathways for sustainable development, in Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press, 1203-1306. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarofim, M., Reilly, J., 2011. Applications of integrated assessment modeling to climate change, Wiley Interdisciplinary Review: Climate Change, 2, 1, 27-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shukla, P.R., Dhar, S., 2011. Climate agreements and India: Aligning options and opportunities on a new track, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11, 3, 229-243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D’Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., Figueroa Meza, M.J., Fulton, L., Kobayashi, S., Lah, O., McKinnon, A., Newman, P., Ouyang, M., Schauer, J.J., Sperling, D., Tiwari, G., 2014. Transport, in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. Sokona, Y. Farahani, E. Kadner, S. Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A., 2010. Competing dimensions of energy security: An international perspective, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 77-108. [Google Scholar]
  • The White House, 2011. Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future. Washington D.C. (online: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/blueprint_secure_energy_future.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • UNFCCC, 2014. Lima Call for Climate Action. Decision 1/CP.20 (online: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/cop20/eng/10a01.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., Dubash, N.K., Lecocq, F., 2014. Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 1, 549-582. [Google Scholar]
  • Waisman, H., Guivarch, C., Grazi, F., Hourcade, J.-C. 2012. The Imaclim-R model: Infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight, Climatic Change, 114, 1, 101-120. [Google Scholar]
  • Waisman, H., Rozenberg, J., Hourcade, J.-C., 2013. Monetary compensations in climate policy through the lens of a general equilibrium assessment: The case of oil-exporting countries, Energy Policy, 63, 951-961. [Google Scholar]
  • West, J.J., Smith, S.J., Silva, R.A., Naik, V., Zhang, Y., Adelman, Z., Fry, M., Anenberg, S., Horowitz, L.W., Lamarque, J.-F., 2013. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health, Nature Climate Change, 3, 885-889. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • World Bank, 2014. Turn Down the Heat: Confronting the New Climate Normal. World Bank, Washington D.C. (online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20595). [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.