EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 23 (2015) Supplément 2015 Nat. Sci. Soc., 23 (2015) S41-S51 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 23, 2015
Les enjeux de la conférence de Paris. Penser autrement la question climatique
Page(s) S41 - S51
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2015017
Published online 22 June 2015
  • Ambrosi, P., Hourcade, J.-C., Hallegatte, S., Lecocq, F., Dumas, P., Ha-Duong, M., 2003. Optimal control models and elicitation of attitudes towards climate damages, Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 8, 3, 133-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anderson, S.T., Parry, I.W., James, H., Sallee, M., Fischer, C., 2011. Automobile Fuel Economy Standards: Impacts, Efficiency, and Alternatives, Review of Environmental Economic and Policy, 5, 1, 89-108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Aykut, S., Dahan, A., 2015. Gouverner le Climat ? Vingt ans de négociations internationales, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po. [Google Scholar]
  • Barker, T., Johnstone, N., O’Shea, T., 1993. The CEC Carbon/Energy Tax and Secondary Transport Related Benefits. Energy-Environment-Economy Modelling Discussion Paper No. 5, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. [Google Scholar]
  • Bodansky, D., Diringer, E., 2014. Evolution of the International Climate Effort, Arlington, Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. [Google Scholar]
  • Bussolo, M., O’Connor, D., 2001. Clearing the Air in India: The Economics of Climate Policy with Ancillary Benefits. Working Paper No. 182, OCDE, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke, L., Jiang, K. Akimoto, K., Babiker, M., Blanford, G., Fisher-Vanden, K., Hourcade, J.-C., Krey, V., Kriegler, E., Löschel, A., McCollum, D., Paltsev, S., Rose, S., Shukla, P. R., Tavoni, M., van der Zwaan, B.C.C., van Vuuren, D.P., 2014. Assessing Transformation Pathways, in Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. Sokona, Y. Farahani, E. Kadner, S. Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds)], Cambridge (UK), New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Combet, E., 2013. Fiscalité carbone et progrès social : application au cas français. Thèse de doctorat, EHESS, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Complainville, C., Martins, J., 1994. NOx/SOx Emissions and Carbon Abatement. Working Papers No. 151, OECD Economics Department, OECD Publishing (online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/345333447174). [Google Scholar]
  • Damian, M., 2014. La politique climatique change enfin de paradigme, Économie Appliquée, 17, 1, 37-72. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubash, N.K., 2013. The politics of climate change in India: Narratives of equity and cobenefits, Wiley Interdisciplinary Review of Climate Change, 4, 3, 191-201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dubash, N.K., Raghunandan, D., Sant, G., Sreenivas, A., 2013. Indian climate change policy: exploring a co-benefits based approach, Economic and Political Weekly, 48, 22, 47-61. [Google Scholar]
  • Garbaccio, R.F., Ho, M.S., Jorgenson, D.W., 1999. Controlling carbon emissions in China, Environment and Development Economics, 4, 4, 493-518. [Google Scholar]
  • Glomsrød, S., Vennemo, H., Johnsen, T., 1992. Stabilization of emissions of CO2: A computable general equilibrium assessment, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 94, 1, 53-69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goulder, L.H., 1995. Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader’s guide, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157-183. [Google Scholar]
  • Grubb, M., Vrolijk, C., Brack, D., 1999. The Kyoto Protocol: A guide and Assessment, London, RIIA/Earthscan, Washington, Brookings. [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta, J., 2014. The History of Global Climate Governance, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., Mathy, S., 2008. Untying the climate - Development Gordian knot: Economic options in a politically constrained world, in Guesnerie, R., Tulkens, H., The Design of Climate Policy, Cambridge (MA), MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., 2013. Triggering the low-carbon transition in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, Climate Policy, 13, Supplement 1: Low carbon drivers for a sustainable world, 22-35. [Google Scholar]
  • IIASA, 2012. Global Energy Assessment (GEA): Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 1996. Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge (UK), New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2007. Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2013. The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. Sokona, Y. Farahani, E. Kadner, S. Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds)], Cambridge (UK) and New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Krupnick, A., Burtraw, D., Markandya, A., 2000. The ancillary benefits and costs of climate change mitigation: A conceptual framework, in OECD (Ed.), Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Paris, 53-93. [Google Scholar]
  • Lecocq, F., 2015. L’évaluation des politiques climatiques à l’échelle globale et nationale, in Torquebiau, E. (Ed.), Changer d’habitudes : changement climatique et agriculture du monde, Versailles, Quae, 279-291. [Google Scholar]
  • Markandya, A., Rübbelke, D.T.G., 2004. Ancillary benefits of climate policy, Journal of Economics and Statistics, 224, 4, 488-503. [Google Scholar]
  • Markandya, A., Armstrong, B.-G., Hales, S., Chiabai, A., Criqui, P., Mima, S., Tonne, C., Wilkinson, P., 2009. Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: Low-carbon electricity generation, The Lancet, 374, 9706, 2006-2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollum, D.L., Krey, V., Riahi, K., 2011. An integrated approach to energy sustainability, Nature Climate Change, 1, 9, 428-29. [Google Scholar]
  • McCollum, D.L., Krey, V., Riahi, K., Kolp, P., Grubler, A., 2013. Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges, Climatic Change, 119, 2, 479-94. [Google Scholar]
  • OECD, 2000. Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Paris, OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Connor, D., Zhai, F., Aunan, K., Berntsen, T., Vennemo, H., 2003. Agricultural and Human Health Impacts of Climate Policy in China: A General Equilibrium Analysis with Special Reference to Guandong. Responding to Local and Global Environmental Challenges, Paris, OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 1976. Limits of cost-benefit analysis as a guide to environmental policy, Kyklos, 29, 1, 97-112. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 1992. Secondary benefits of greenhouse gas control. CSERGE Working Paper, No 92-12, University of East Anglia and University College London, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 2000. Policy framework for the ancillary benefits of climate change policies, in OECD (Ed.), Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Paris, 517-560. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D.W., 2001. Controversies in environmental valuation, in McMahon, P., Moran, D. (Ed.), Economic Valuation of Water Resources: Policy and Practice, London, Terence Dalton, 49-63. [Google Scholar]
  • Riahi, K., Dentener, F., Gielen, D., Grubler, A., Jewell, J., 2012. Chapter 17: Energy pathways for sustainable development, in Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge (UK), Cambridge University Press, 1203-1306. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarofim, M., Reilly, J., 2011. Applications of integrated assessment modeling to climate change, Wiley Interdisciplinary Review: Climate Change, 2, 1, 27-44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shukla, P.R., Dhar, S., 2011. Climate agreements and India: Aligning options and opportunities on a new track, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11, 3, 229-243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D’Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., Figueroa Meza, M.J., Fulton, L., Kobayashi, S., Lah, O., McKinnon, A., Newman, P., Ouyang, M., Schauer, J.J., Sperling, D., Tiwari, G., 2014. Transport, in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R. Sokona, Y. Farahani, E. Kadner, S. Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., Kriemann, B., Savolainen, J., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., Zwickel, T., Minx, J.C. (Eds)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) and New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Sovacool, B.K., Brown, M.A., 2010. Competing dimensions of energy security: An international perspective, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 77-108. [Google Scholar]
  • The White House, 2011. Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future. Washington D.C. (online: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/blueprint_secure_energy_future.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • UNFCCC, 2014. Lima Call for Climate Action. Decision 1/CP.20 (online: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/cop20/eng/10a01.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Tirado Herrero, S., Dubash, N.K., Lecocq, F., 2014. Measuring the co-benefits of climate change mitigation, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 1, 549-582. [Google Scholar]
  • Waisman, H., Guivarch, C., Grazi, F., Hourcade, J.-C. 2012. The Imaclim-R model: Infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight, Climatic Change, 114, 1, 101-120. [Google Scholar]
  • Waisman, H., Rozenberg, J., Hourcade, J.-C., 2013. Monetary compensations in climate policy through the lens of a general equilibrium assessment: The case of oil-exporting countries, Energy Policy, 63, 951-961. [Google Scholar]
  • West, J.J., Smith, S.J., Silva, R.A., Naik, V., Zhang, Y., Adelman, Z., Fry, M., Anenberg, S., Horowitz, L.W., Lamarque, J.-F., 2013. Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health, Nature Climate Change, 3, 885-889. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • World Bank, 2014. Turn Down the Heat: Confronting the New Climate Normal. World Bank, Washington D.C. (online: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/20595). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.