Open Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 23, 2015
Les enjeux de la conférence de Paris. Penser autrement la question climatique
Page(s) S29 - S40
Published online 22 June 2015
  • Afful-Koomson, T., 2014. The Green Climate Fund in Africa: What should be different?, Climate and Development, doi: 10.1080/17565529.2014.951015. [Google Scholar]
  • Agence internationale de l’énergie (AIE), 2011. Energy for all, financing access for the poor, Paris, OCDE/IEA. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahonen, H.-M., Hämekoski, K., 2005. Transaction Costs under the Finish CDM/JI Programme. Discussion Paper No 12, University of Helsinki, Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
  • Ban, K.M., Al-Madani, A., Barroso, J.M., Gurria, A., Kaberuka, D., Strauss-Kahn, D., Ping, J., Zoellick, R., 2008. Achieving the MDGs. Recommendations of the MDG Africa Steering Group, New York (online: [Google Scholar]
  • Barr, R., Fankhauser, S., Hamilton, K., 2010. Adaptation investments: A resource allocation framework, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 15, 8, 843-858. [Google Scholar]
  • Bhagat, C., Honda, K., Pandit, V., Pinshaw, G., Roy, B., Yoo, Y., 2012. Private Equity’s New Asian Strength. McKinsey (online: [Google Scholar]
  • Birdsall, N., Savedoff, W.D., 2011. Cash On Delivery: A New Approach to Foreign Aid, Washington DC, Center for Global Development. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourguignon, F., Diaz-Bonilla, C., Lofgren, H., 2008. Aid, Service Delivery, and the Millennium Development Goals in an Economy-Wide Framework. Research Working Paper No. 4683, World Bank Policy, Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Buys, P., Deichmann, U., Meisner, C., Ton That, T., Wheeler, D., 2009. Country stakes in climate change negotiations: Two dimensions of vulnerability, Climate Policy, 9, 288-305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Camdessus, M., 2003. Financing Water for All. Report of the World Panel on Financing Water Infrastructure, World Water Council. [Google Scholar]
  • Chakrvarty, S., Tavoni, M., 2013. Energy poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation: Is there a trade off?, Note di Lavoro, 25, FEEM. [Google Scholar]
  • Davis, S., Socolow, R., 2014. Commitment accounting of CO2 emissions, Environmental Research Letters, 9. [Google Scholar]
  • Dechezleprêtre, A., Glachant, M., Ménière, Y., 2008. Technology transfer by CDM projects: A comparison of Brazil, China, India and Mexico, Energy Policy, 37, 2, 703-711. [Google Scholar]
  • Eichler, R., Levine, R., 2009. Performance Incentives for Global Health: Potential and Pitfalls, Washington DC, Center for Global Development. [Google Scholar]
  • Fankhauser, S., Schmidt-Traub, G., 2010. From Adaptation to Climate-Resilient Development: The Costs of Climate-Proofing the Millennium Development Goals in Africa. Policy Research Working paper No 4342, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. [Google Scholar]
  • Füssel, H.-M., 2010. How inequitable is the global distribution of responsibility, capability, and vulnerability to climate change: A comprehensive indicator-based assessment, Global Environmental Change, 20, 597-611. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gertler, P., Shelef, O., Wolfram, C., Fuchs A., 2011. Poverty, Growth, and the Demand for Energy. Working paper 224, Energy Institute at Haas. [Google Scholar]
  • Global Partnership on Output-Based Aid (GPOBA), 2009. A Review of the Use of Output-Based Aid Approaches. International Development Association, Finance, Economics and Urban Department, Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Green Climate Fund (GCF), 2011. Governing Instrument for the Green Climate Fund. Durban. [Google Scholar]
  • Green Climate Fund (GCF), 2014a. Initial Modalities for the Operation of the Fund’s Mitigation and Adaptation Windows and its Private Sector Facility. GCF/B.07/08, Songdo. [Google Scholar]
  • Green Climate Fund (GCF), 2014b. Country Ownership. GCF/B.06/07, Songdo. [Google Scholar]
  • Green Climate Fund (GCF), 2014c. Additional Modalities that Further Enhance Direct Access, Including through Funding Entities. GCF/B.08/09, Songdo. [Google Scholar]
  • Green Climate Fund (GCF), 2014d. Initial Proposal Approval Process. GCF/B.07/03, Songdo. [Google Scholar]
  • Green Climate Fund (GCF), 2014e. Business Model Framework: Financial Instruments. GCF/B.04/06, Songdo. [Google Scholar]
  • Guivarch, C., Mathy, S., 2010. Climate policies in a second-best world: A case study on India, Energy Policy, 38, 3, 1519-1528. [Google Scholar]
  • Hallegatte, S., 2011. A Macro Output-Based Approach to Climate Change Adaptation Funding in Developing Countries, non publié. [Google Scholar]
  • Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., Mathy, S., 2009. Untying the climate - Development gordian knot: Economic options in a politically constrained world, in Guesnerie, R., Tulkens, H. (Eds), The Design of Climate Policy, MIT press, 75-99. [Google Scholar]
  • Hussain, M.Z., 2011. Results Based Financing Mechanisms: Experience from Output Based Aid Partnership Forum Panel Sessions – Financing Transformations, Cape Town, CIF Partnership Forum. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones, G., Steketee, R., Black, R., Bhutta, Z., Morris, S., 2003. How many child deaths can we prevent this year?, The Lancet, 362, 9377, 65-71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khan, F.I., Schinn, D.S., 2013. Triple transformation, Nature. Climate Change, 3, 692-694. [Google Scholar]
  • Klein, R.J., Möhner, A., 2011. The political dimension of vulnerability to the adverse effects of climate change, IDS Bulletin, 42, 3, 15-22. [Google Scholar]
  • Klein, R.J., Persson, A., 2008. Financing Adaptation to Climate Change: Issues and Priorities. ECP Report No. 8, The Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels. [Google Scholar]
  • Ligon, E., Sadoulet, E., 2011. Estimating the Effects of Aggregate Agricultural Growth on the Distribution of Expenditures. CUDARE Working Paper No. 1115, University of California, Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
  • Mathy, S., Guivarch, C., 2012. Energy decoupling in a second best world: A case study in India, Climatic Change, 113, 2, 339-356. [Google Scholar]
  • Michaelowa, A., Hoch, S., 2013. FIT for Renewables? Design Options For the Green Climate Fund to Support Renewable Energy Feed-In Tariffs in Developing Countries, Hambourg, World Future Council. [Google Scholar]
  • Michaelowa, A., Jotzo. F., 2005. Transaction costs, institutional rigidities and the size of the clean development mechanism, Energy Policy, 33, 4, 511-523. [Google Scholar]
  • Michaelowa, A., Stronzik, M., Eckermann, F., Hunt, A., 2003. Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms, Climate Policy, 3, 261-278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Müller, B., 2013. A Delhi Vision for the Green Climate Fund Business Model Framework: Some Thoughts on Access and Disbursement, Oxford, Oxford Energy and Environment Brief. [Google Scholar]
  • Mumssen, Y., Johannes, L., Kumar, G., 2010. Output-Based Aid: Lessons Learned and Best Practice, Washington DC, The World Bank. [Google Scholar]
  • Nakhooda, S., Caravani, A., Bird, N., Schalatek, L., 2011. Climate finance in Sub-Saharan Africa, Climate Finance Policy Brief. [Google Scholar]
  • Nakhooda, S., Norman, M., Barnard, S., Watson, C., Greenhill, R., Caravani, A., Canales Trujillo, N., Banton, G., 2014. Climate Finance: Is it Making a Difference? A Review of the Effectiveness of Multilateral Climate Funds. Overseas development Institute, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Persson, A., Remling, E., 2014. Equity and efficiency in adaptation finance: Initial experiences of the Adaptation Fund, Climate Policy, 14, 4, 488-506. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Röttgers, D., Grote, U., 2014. Africa and the clean development mechanism: What determines project investments?, World Development, 62, 201-212. [Google Scholar]
  • Rousset, N., 2012. Économie du changement climatique : des politiques d’atténuation aux politiques d’adaptation. Thèse de doctorat, Laboratoire EDDEN, CNRS, Université de Grenoble. [Google Scholar]
  • Samaniego, J., Figueres, C., 2002. A sector-based clean development mechanism, in Baumert, K., Blanchard, O., Llosa, S., Perkaus, J. (Eds), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate, World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Shepherd, A., Mitchell, T., Lewis, K., Lenhardt, A., Jones, L., Scott, L., Muir-Woods, R., 2013. The Geography of Poverty, Disasters and Climate Extremes in 2030, London, Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Skoufias, E., Rabassa, M., Olivieri, S., Brahmbhatt, M., 2011. The poverty impacts of climate change, Economic Premise, 51, The World Bank. [Google Scholar]
  • Stadelmann, M., Persson A., Ratajczak-Juszko, I., Michaelowa, A., 2014. Equity and cost-effectiveness of multilateral adaptation finance: Are they friends or foes?, International Environmental Agreements, 1, 1-20. [Google Scholar]
  • United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2014. World Investment Report 2014. Investing in the SDGs: An Action Plan. UNCTAD, New-York, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • UN Millennium Project, 2005. Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Wheeler, D., 2011. Quantifying Vulnerability to Climate Change: Implications for Adaptation Assistance. Centre for Global Development Working Paper 240, Centre for Global Development, Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
  • Winkelman, A.G., Moore, M.R., 2011. Explaining the differential distribution of clean development mechanism projects across host countries, Energy Policy, 39, 3, 1132-1143. [Google Scholar]
  • Winkler, H., Saplding-Fecher, R., Mwakasonda, S., Davidson, O. 2002. Sustainable development policies and measures: Starting from development to tackle climate change, in Baumert, K., Blanchard, O., Llosa, S., Perkaus, J. (Eds), Building on the Kyoto Protocol: Options for Protecting the Climate, World Resources Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Wolfram, C., Shelef, O., Gertler, P., 2012. How will energy demand develop in the developing world?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26, 1, 119-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.