Open Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Numéro 4, octobre-décembre 2012
Page(s) 472 - 475
Section Libre opinion – Opinion
Publié en ligne 14 mai 2013
  • Abbas, A.M., 2011. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship, Scientometrics, 88, 107-131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Assimakis, N.,Adam, M., 2010. A new author’s productivity index: p-index, Scientometrics, 85, 415-427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costas, R., Bordons, M., 2011. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective, Scientometrics, 88, 145-161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cullen, P.W., Norris, R.H., Resh, V.H., Reynoldson, T.B., Rosenberg, D.M., Barbour, M.T., 1999. Collaboration in scientific research: a critical need for freshwater ecology, Freshwater Biology, 42, 131-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Day, R.A., 1979. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, Philadelphia, ISI Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Djerassi, C., 1989. Cantor’s Dilemma, New York, Doubleday. [Google Scholar]
  • Gore, J.A.,Niemela, S.,Resh, V.H.,Statzner, B., 1994. Near-substrate hydraulic conditions under artificial floods from peaking hydropower operation: a preliminary analysis of disturbance intensity and duration, Regulated Rivers, 9, 15-34. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingsporn, B., Hornbostel, S., 2008. Scientific authorship between social capital and ethical commitment, in Vaccaro, A., Horta, H., Madsen, P. (Eds), Transparency, information and communication technology: social responsability in business and education, Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies, Transparency and Social Responsibility Conference, Charlottesville, Philosophy Documentation Center. [Google Scholar]
  • Merton, R.K., 1968. The Matthew Effect in science, Science, 159, 56-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Resh, V.H.,Yamamoto, D., 1994. International collaboration in freshwater ecology, Freshwater Biology, 32, 613-624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Retzer, V.,Jurasinski, G., 2009. Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators. A protocol for incorporating complexity, Basic and Applied Ecology, 10, 393-400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schäfer, R.B., Cooke, S.J., Arlinghaus, A., Bonada, N., Brischoux, F., Casper, A.F., Catford, J.A., Rolland, V., 2011. P erspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology – a response to Statzner & Resh (2010), Freshwater Biology, 56, 2405-2412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B.,Müller, R., 1989. Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthos research, Freshwater Biology, 21, 445-459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B.,Resh, V.H., 2010. Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences, Freshwater Biology, 55, 2639-2653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B., Gore, J.A., Resh, V.H., 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7, 307-360. [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B., Gore, J.A., andResh, V.H., 1998. Monte Carlo simulations of benthic macroinvertebrates populations: estimates using random, stratified and gradient sampling, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 17, 324-337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B., Resh, V.H., Dolédec, S. (Eds), 1994. Ecology of the Upper Rhône River: a test of habitat templet theories, Freshwater Biology, 31, 253-554. [Google Scholar]
  • Tedesco, P.A., 2011. The race to publish in the age of ever-increasing productivity, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 432-435. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tol, R.S.J., 2011. Credit where credit is due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts, Scientometrics, 89, 291-299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M.E., Rand, T.A., Resh, V.H., Krauss, J., 2007. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multi-authored publications. PLoS Biology, 5, 1, e18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wren, J.D.,Kozak, K.Z.,Johnson, K.R.,Deakyne, S.J.,Schilling, L.M.,Dellavalle, R.P., 2007. The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline and number of authors, Embo Reports, 8, 988-991. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.