Open Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Number 4, octobre-décembre 2012
Page(s) 472 - 475
Section Libre opinion – Opinion
Published online 14 May 2013
  • Abbas, A.M., 2011. Weighted indices for evaluating the quality of research with multiple authorship, Scientometrics, 88, 107-131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Assimakis, N.,Adam, M., 2010. A new author’s productivity index: p-index, Scientometrics, 85, 415-427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costas, R., Bordons, M., 2011. Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective, Scientometrics, 88, 145-161. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cullen, P.W., Norris, R.H., Resh, V.H., Reynoldson, T.B., Rosenberg, D.M., Barbour, M.T., 1999. Collaboration in scientific research: a critical need for freshwater ecology, Freshwater Biology, 42, 131-142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Day, R.A., 1979. How to Write and Publish a Scientific Paper, Philadelphia, ISI Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Djerassi, C., 1989. Cantor’s Dilemma, New York, Doubleday. [Google Scholar]
  • Gore, J.A.,Niemela, S.,Resh, V.H.,Statzner, B., 1994. Near-substrate hydraulic conditions under artificial floods from peaking hydropower operation: a preliminary analysis of disturbance intensity and duration, Regulated Rivers, 9, 15-34. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Klingsporn, B., Hornbostel, S., 2008. Scientific authorship between social capital and ethical commitment, in Vaccaro, A., Horta, H., Madsen, P. (Eds), Transparency, information and communication technology: social responsability in business and education, Proceedings of the Information and Communication Technologies, Transparency and Social Responsibility Conference, Charlottesville, Philosophy Documentation Center. [Google Scholar]
  • Merton, R.K., 1968. The Matthew Effect in science, Science, 159, 56-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Resh, V.H.,Yamamoto, D., 1994. International collaboration in freshwater ecology, Freshwater Biology, 32, 613-624. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Retzer, V.,Jurasinski, G., 2009. Towards objectivity in research evaluation using bibliometric indicators. A protocol for incorporating complexity, Basic and Applied Ecology, 10, 393-400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schäfer, R.B., Cooke, S.J., Arlinghaus, A., Bonada, N., Brischoux, F., Casper, A.F., Catford, J.A., Rolland, V., 2011. P erspectives from early career researchers on the publication process in ecology – a response to Statzner & Resh (2010), Freshwater Biology, 56, 2405-2412. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B.,Müller, R., 1989. Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristics in lotic benthos research, Freshwater Biology, 21, 445-459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B.,Resh, V.H., 2010. Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences, Freshwater Biology, 55, 2639-2653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B., Gore, J.A., Resh, V.H., 1988. Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 7, 307-360. [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B., Gore, J.A., andResh, V.H., 1998. Monte Carlo simulations of benthic macroinvertebrates populations: estimates using random, stratified and gradient sampling, Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 17, 324-337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Statzner, B., Resh, V.H., Dolédec, S. (Eds), 1994. Ecology of the Upper Rhône River: a test of habitat templet theories, Freshwater Biology, 31, 253-554. [Google Scholar]
  • Tedesco, P.A., 2011. The race to publish in the age of ever-increasing productivity, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 432-435. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tol, R.S.J., 2011. Credit where credit is due: accounting for co-authorship in citation counts, Scientometrics, 89, 291-299. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tscharntke, T., Hochberg, M.E., Rand, T.A., Resh, V.H., Krauss, J., 2007. Author sequence and credit for contributions in multi-authored publications. PLoS Biology, 5, 1, e18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wren, J.D.,Kozak, K.Z.,Johnson, K.R.,Deakyne, S.J.,Schilling, L.M.,Dellavalle, R.P., 2007. The write position. A survey of perceived contributions to papers based on byline and number of authors, Embo Reports, 8, 988-991. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.