EDP Sciences logo
Soumettre un article
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 20 / Numéro 1 (janvier-mars 2012) Nat. Sci. Soc., 20 1 (2012) 3-15 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Numéro 1, janvier-mars 2012
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » (suite)
Page(s) 3 - 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2012002
Publié en ligne 4 juillet 2012
  • Aznar, O., Jeanneaux, P., Déprés, C., 2009. Les services environnementaux fournis par l'agriculture, entre logique sectorielle et logique territoriale : un cadre d’analyse économique. Communication aux 3es Journées de recherches en sciences sociales, INRA/SFER/CIRAD, Montpellier, 9-11 décembre. [Google Scholar]
  • Aznar, O., Jeanneaux, P., de Mareschal, S., 2010. Analyse bibliométrique de la notion de « service environnemental ». Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-09. [Google Scholar]
  • Biswas, M., Biswas, K., 1982. Environment and sustained development in the Third World: A review of the past decade, Third World Quarterly, 4, 3, 479-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63, 2-3, 616-626. [Google Scholar]
  • Brandon, K., 1996. Ecotourism and Conservation: A Review of Key Issues. Environment Department Paper, 033, The World Bank, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5, 1305-1312. [Google Scholar]
  • Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Pujol, J.-L. (Eds), Conseil d’analyse stratégique, 2009. Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes, Paris, La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Chomitz, K., Kumari, K., 1996. The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: A Critical Review Emphasising Hydrological Functions. Policy Research Working Paper, 1601, The World Bank, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141, 2, 350-352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., Daly, H.E., 1987. Toward an ecological economics, Ecological Modelling, 38, 1-2, 1-7. [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daily, G.C. (Ed.), 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Daily, G.C., Ellison, K., 2002. The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable, Washington (DC), Island Press / Shearwater Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Dale, V.H., Polasky, S., 2007. Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 286-296. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Daly, H.E., 1998. The return of Lauderdale's paradox, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 21-23. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Douai, A., Vivien, F.-D., 2009. Économie écologique et économie hétérodoxe : pour une socio-économie politique de l'environnement et du développement durable, Économie appliquée, 62, 3, 117-157. [Google Scholar]
  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 4, 663-674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 2007. La Situation mondiale de l'alimentation et de l'agriculture : payer les agriculteurs pour les services environnementaux. Rapport, FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferraro, P.J., Kiss, A., 2002. Ecology: Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 5599, 1718-1719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, B., Costanza, R., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., 2007. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 07-04. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, B., Turner, K., 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation, Biological Conservation, 141, 5, 1167-1169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forrester, J.W., 1996. The beginning of system dynamics. Banquet talk at the international meeting of the System Dynamics Society, Stuttgart, July 13, l989 (http://web. mit.edu/sysdyn/sd-intro/D-4165-1.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J., Vaissière, B.E., 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 810-821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1209-1218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C., Finisdore, J., 2008. Évaluation des services rendus par les écosystèmes aux entreprises. Rapport, World Resources Institute, Washington (DC) / Meridian Institute, Dillon (CO) / WBCSD, Conches-Geneva (http://www.wri.org/publication/corporate-ecosystem-services-review). [Google Scholar]
  • Hueting, R., Reijnders, L., de Boer, B., Lambooy, J., Jansen, H., 1998. The concept of environmental function and its valuation, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 31-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson, L.E., Pascual, U., Hodgkin, T., 2007. Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 3, 196-210. [Google Scholar]
  • Kosoy, N., Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1228-1236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kroeger, T., Casey, F., 2007. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 321-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Landell-Mills, N, Porras, T., 2002. Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Impact on the Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development, London (http://pubs.iied.org/9066IIED.html). [Google Scholar]
  • Layke, C., 2009. Measuring Nature’s Benefits: A Preliminary Roadmap for Improving Ecosystem Service Indicators. Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington (DC) [http://www.wri.org/publication/measuring-natures-benefits]. [Google Scholar]
  • Legrand, T., Le Coq, J.-F., Froger, G., Saenz, F., 2010. Émergence et usages de la notion de service environnemental au Costa Rica : l’exemple du Programme de paiement pour services environnementaux (PPSE). Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-03. [Google Scholar]
  • Leopold, A., 1949. A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There, New York, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsh, G.P., 1864. Man and Nature; or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action, New York, C. Scribner. [Google Scholar]
  • Méral, P., 2010. Les services environnementaux en économie : revue de la littérature. Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-05. [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington (DC), Island Press (http://www.maweb.org/en/Framework.aspx). [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, du Développement durable et de la Mer, 2009. Évaluation des services rendus par les écosystèmes en France : application du Millennium Ecosystem Assessment à la France. Étude exploratoire, synthèse, septembre, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Mooney, H.A., Ehrlich, P.R., 1997. Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history, in Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press, 11-19. [Google Scholar]
  • Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.H., 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1202-1208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers, J.P., Reichert, J.S., 1997. Perspective in nature’s services, in Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press, XVII-XX. [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H., 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 28, 9495-9500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard, R.B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1219-1227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard, R.B., Bode, C., 1998. Next, the value of God, and other reactions, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 37-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Odum, H.T., 1971. Environment, Power, and Society, New York, Wiley-Interscience. [Google Scholar]
  • Osborn, F., 1948. Our Plundered Planet, Boston, Little, Brown and Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., Landell-Mills, N., 2002. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Maket-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Pagiola, S., Platais, G., 2004. Payments for Environmental Services, Environment and Strategy Notes, 3, The World Bank, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Pascual, U., Perrings, C., 2007. Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 3, 256-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passet, R., 1989. L’Économie de l’environnement et de la biosphère, Cahier du C3E. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D., Moran, D., 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D., Bello, T., 1998. Selling Carbon Storage: Background Paper for the Guyana Forest Partnership Initiative (http://www.profor.info/profor/Documents/pdf/SellingStorage.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Perrings, C., 2000. The Economics of Biodiversity Conservation in Sub-Saharian Africa: Mending the Ark, Chetelham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Pesche, D., Bidaud, C., Dare, W., Hrabanski, M., Massardier, G., Queste, J., 2010. Contributions de la sociologie et de la science politique à la recherche sur les services environnementaux. Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-06 (http://www.serena-anr.org/spip.php? article177). [Google Scholar]
  • Ranganathan J., Munasinghe M., Irwin F., 2008. Policies for Sustainable Governance of Global Ecosystem Services, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Røpke, I., 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, Ecological Economics, 55, 2, 262-290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SCEP [Study of Critical Environmental Problems], Matthews, W.H. (Eds), 1970. Man's Impact on the Global Environment: Assessment and Recommendations for Action, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Spash, C.L., 2009. The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability, Environmental Values, 18, 3, 253-256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swinton, S.M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G.P., Hamilton, S.K., 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 245-252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2008. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report (http://www.teebweb.org/ForCitizens/tabid/1022/Default.aspx [TEEB Interim Report]). [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers. Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature (http://www.teebweb.org/ForPolicymakers/tabid/1019/Default.aspx). [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2010. TEEB for Business: Executive Summary (http://www.teebweb.org/ForBusiness/tabid/1021/Default.aspx). [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, W.R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T.M., Costanza, R., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Portela, R., 2007. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services, Bioscience, 57, 10, 868-873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt, W., 1948. Road to Survival, New York, W. Sloane Associates. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace, K.J., 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions, Biological Conservation, 139, 3-4, 235-246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watson, R.T., Dixon, J.A., Hamburg, S.P., Janetos, A.C., Moss, R.H., 1998. Protecting our Planet Securing our Future: Linkages among Global Environmental Issues and Human Needs. UNEP, Nairobi / The World Bank, Wathington (DC) / NASA, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Boots. CIFOR Occasional Paper, 42 (www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Wunder, S., Albán, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador, Ecological Economics, 65, 4, 685-698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremer, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 253-260. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.