Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Number 1, janvier-mars 2012
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » (suite)
Page(s) 3 - 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2012002
Published online 04 July 2012
  • Aznar, O., Jeanneaux, P., Déprés, C., 2009. Les services environnementaux fournis par l'agriculture, entre logique sectorielle et logique territoriale : un cadre d’analyse économique. Communication aux 3es Journées de recherches en sciences sociales, INRA/SFER/CIRAD, Montpellier, 9-11 décembre. [Google Scholar]
  • Aznar, O., Jeanneaux, P., de Mareschal, S., 2010. Analyse bibliométrique de la notion de « service environnemental ». Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-09. [Google Scholar]
  • Biswas, M., Biswas, K., 1982. Environment and sustained development in the Third World: A review of the past decade, Third World Quarterly, 4, 3, 479-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63, 2-3, 616-626. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brandon, K., 1996. Ecotourism and Conservation: A Review of Key Issues. Environment Department Paper, 033, The World Bank, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5, 1305-1312. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Pujol, J.-L. (Eds), Conseil d’analyse stratégique, 2009. Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes, Paris, La Documentation française. [Google Scholar]
  • Chomitz, K., Kumari, K., 1996. The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: A Critical Review Emphasising Hydrological Functions. Policy Research Working Paper, 1601, The World Bank, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141, 2, 350-352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., Daly, H.E., 1987. Toward an ecological economics, Ecological Modelling, 38, 1-2, 1-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daily, G.C. (Ed.), 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Daily, G.C., Ellison, K., 2002. The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable, Washington (DC), Island Press / Shearwater Books. [Google Scholar]
  • Dale, V.H., Polasky, S., 2007. Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 286-296. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Daly, H.E., 1998. The return of Lauderdale's paradox, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 21-23. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Douai, A., Vivien, F.-D., 2009. Économie écologique et économie hétérodoxe : pour une socio-économie politique de l'environnement et du développement durable, Économie appliquée, 62, 3, 117-157. [Google Scholar]
  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 4, 663-674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 2007. La Situation mondiale de l'alimentation et de l'agriculture : payer les agriculteurs pour les services environnementaux. Rapport, FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferraro, P.J., Kiss, A., 2002. Ecology: Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 5599, 1718-1719. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, B., Costanza, R., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., 2007. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 07-04. [Google Scholar]
  • Fisher, B., Turner, K., 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation, Biological Conservation, 141, 5, 1167-1169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forrester, J.W., 1996. The beginning of system dynamics. Banquet talk at the international meeting of the System Dynamics Society, Stuttgart, July 13, l989 (http://web. mit.edu/sysdyn/sd-intro/D-4165-1.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J., Vaissière, B.E., 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 810-821. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1209-1218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C., Finisdore, J., 2008. Évaluation des services rendus par les écosystèmes aux entreprises. Rapport, World Resources Institute, Washington (DC) / Meridian Institute, Dillon (CO) / WBCSD, Conches-Geneva (http://www.wri.org/publication/corporate-ecosystem-services-review). [Google Scholar]
  • Hueting, R., Reijnders, L., de Boer, B., Lambooy, J., Jansen, H., 1998. The concept of environmental function and its valuation, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 31-35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson, L.E., Pascual, U., Hodgkin, T., 2007. Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 3, 196-210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kosoy, N., Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1228-1236. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kroeger, T., Casey, F., 2007. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 321-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Landell-Mills, N, Porras, T., 2002. Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Impact on the Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development, London (http://pubs.iied.org/9066IIED.html). [Google Scholar]
  • Layke, C., 2009. Measuring Nature’s Benefits: A Preliminary Roadmap for Improving Ecosystem Service Indicators. Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington (DC) [http://www.wri.org/publication/measuring-natures-benefits]. [Google Scholar]
  • Legrand, T., Le Coq, J.-F., Froger, G., Saenz, F., 2010. Émergence et usages de la notion de service environnemental au Costa Rica : l’exemple du Programme de paiement pour services environnementaux (PPSE). Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-03. [Google Scholar]
  • Leopold, A., 1949. A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There, New York, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsh, G.P., 1864. Man and Nature; or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action, New York, C. Scribner. [Google Scholar]
  • Méral, P., 2010. Les services environnementaux en économie : revue de la littérature. Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-05. [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington (DC), Island Press (http://www.maweb.org/en/Framework.aspx). [Google Scholar]
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Washington (DC), Island Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, du Développement durable et de la Mer, 2009. Évaluation des services rendus par les écosystèmes en France : application du Millennium Ecosystem Assessment à la France. Étude exploratoire, synthèse, septembre, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Mooney, H.A., Ehrlich, P.R., 1997. Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history, in Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press, 11-19. [Google Scholar]
  • Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.H., 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1202-1208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Myers, J.P., Reichert, J.S., 1997. Perspective in nature’s services, in Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press, XVII-XX. [Google Scholar]
  • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H., 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 28, 9495-9500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard, R.B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1219-1227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norgaard, R.B., Bode, C., 1998. Next, the value of God, and other reactions, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 37-39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Odum, H.T., 1971. Environment, Power, and Society, New York, Wiley-Interscience. [Google Scholar]
  • Osborn, F., 1948. Our Plundered Planet, Boston, Little, Brown and Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., Landell-Mills, N., 2002. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Maket-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Pagiola, S., Platais, G., 2004. Payments for Environmental Services, Environment and Strategy Notes, 3, The World Bank, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Pascual, U., Perrings, C., 2007. Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 3, 256-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passet, R., 1989. L’Économie de l’environnement et de la biosphère, Cahier du C3E. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D., Moran, D., 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity, London, Earthscan. [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce, D., Bello, T., 1998. Selling Carbon Storage: Background Paper for the Guyana Forest Partnership Initiative (http://www.profor.info/profor/Documents/pdf/SellingStorage.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Perrings, C., 2000. The Economics of Biodiversity Conservation in Sub-Saharian Africa: Mending the Ark, Chetelham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Pesche, D., Bidaud, C., Dare, W., Hrabanski, M., Massardier, G., Queste, J., 2010. Contributions de la sociologie et de la science politique à la recherche sur les services environnementaux. Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-06 (http://www.serena-anr.org/spip.php? article177). [Google Scholar]
  • Ranganathan J., Munasinghe M., Irwin F., 2008. Policies for Sustainable Governance of Global Ecosystem Services, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Røpke, I., 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, Ecological Economics, 55, 2, 262-290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SCEP [Study of Critical Environmental Problems], Matthews, W.H. (Eds), 1970. Man's Impact on the Global Environment: Assessment and Recommendations for Action, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Spash, C.L., 2009. The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability, Environmental Values, 18, 3, 253-256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swinton, S.M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G.P., Hamilton, S.K., 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 245-252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2008. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report (http://www.teebweb.org/ForCitizens/tabid/1022/Default.aspx [TEEB Interim Report]). [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers. Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature (http://www.teebweb.org/ForPolicymakers/tabid/1019/Default.aspx). [Google Scholar]
  • TEEB, 2010. TEEB for Business: Executive Summary (http://www.teebweb.org/ForBusiness/tabid/1021/Default.aspx). [Google Scholar]
  • Turner, W.R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T.M., Costanza, R., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Portela, R., 2007. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services, Bioscience, 57, 10, 868-873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vogt, W., 1948. Road to Survival, New York, W. Sloane Associates. [Google Scholar]
  • Wallace, K.J., 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions, Biological Conservation, 139, 3-4, 235-246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watson, R.T., Dixon, J.A., Hamburg, S.P., Janetos, A.C., Moss, R.H., 1998. Protecting our Planet Securing our Future: Linkages among Global Environmental Issues and Human Needs. UNEP, Nairobi / The World Bank, Wathington (DC) / NASA, Washington (DC). [Google Scholar]
  • Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Boots. CIFOR Occasional Paper, 42 (www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Wunder, S., Albán, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador, Ecological Economics, 65, 4, 685-698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremer, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 253-260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.