Free Access
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Number 1, janvier-mars 2012
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » (suite)
Page(s) 3 - 15
Published online 04 July 2012
  • Aznar, O., Jeanneaux, P., Déprés, C., 2009. Les services environnementaux fournis par l'agriculture, entre logique sectorielle et logique territoriale : un cadre d’analyse économique. Communication aux 3es Journées de recherches en sciences sociales, INRA/SFER/CIRAD, Montpellier, 9-11 décembre.
  • Aznar, O., Jeanneaux, P., de Mareschal, S., 2010. Analyse bibliométrique de la notion de « service environnemental ». Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-09.
  • Biswas, M., Biswas, K., 1982. Environment and sustained development in the Third World: A review of the past decade, Third World Quarterly, 4, 3, 479-491. [CrossRef]
  • Boyd, J., Banzhaf, S., 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, Ecological Economics, 63, 2-3, 616-626. [CrossRef]
  • Brandon, K., 1996. Ecotourism and Conservation: A Review of Key Issues. Environment Department Paper, 033, The World Bank, Washington (DC).
  • Carpenter, S.R., Mooney, H.A., Agard, J., Capistrano, D., DeFries, R.S., Díaz, S., Dietz, T., Duraiappah, A.K., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Pereira, H.M., Perrings, C., Reid, W.V., Sarukhan, J., Scholes, R.J., Whyte, A., 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 5, 1305-1312. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Chevassus-au-Louis, B., Salles, J.-M., Pujol, J.-L. (Eds), Conseil d’analyse stratégique, 2009. Approche économique de la biodiversité et des services liés aux écosystèmes, Paris, La Documentation française.
  • Chomitz, K., Kumari, K., 1996. The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: A Critical Review Emphasising Hydrological Functions. Policy Research Working Paper, 1601, The World Bank, Washington (DC).
  • Costanza, R., 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed, Biological Conservation, 141, 2, 350-352. [CrossRef]
  • Costanza, R., Daly, H.E., 1987. Toward an ecological economics, Ecological Modelling, 38, 1-2, 1-7. [CrossRef]
  • Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260. [CrossRef]
  • Daily, G.C. (Ed.), 1997. Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press.
  • Daily, G.C., Ellison, K., 2002. The New Economy of Nature: The Quest to Make Conservation Profitable, Washington (DC), Island Press / Shearwater Books.
  • Dale, V.H., Polasky, S., 2007. Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 286-296. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Daly, H.E., 1998. The return of Lauderdale's paradox, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 21-23. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Douai, A., Vivien, F.-D., 2009. Économie écologique et économie hétérodoxe : pour une socio-économie politique de l'environnement et du développement durable, Économie appliquée, 62, 3, 117-157.
  • Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Wunder, S., 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues, Ecological Economics, 65, 4, 663-674. [CrossRef]
  • FAO, 2007. La Situation mondiale de l'alimentation et de l'agriculture : payer les agriculteurs pour les services environnementaux. Rapport, FAO, Rome.
  • Ferraro, P.J., Kiss, A., 2002. Ecology: Direct payments to conserve biodiversity, Science, 298, 5599, 1718-1719. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Fisher, B., Costanza, R., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., 2007. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. CSERGE Working Paper EDM 07-04.
  • Fisher, B., Turner, K., 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation, Biological Conservation, 141, 5, 1167-1169. [CrossRef]
  • Forrester, J.W., 1996. The beginning of system dynamics. Banquet talk at the international meeting of the System Dynamics Society, Stuttgart, July 13, l989 (http://web.
  • Gallai, N., Salles, J.-M., Settele, J., Vaissière, B.E., 2009. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 810-821. [CrossRef]
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P.L., Montes, C., 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1209-1218. [CrossRef]
  • Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C., Finisdore, J., 2008. Évaluation des services rendus par les écosystèmes aux entreprises. Rapport, World Resources Institute, Washington (DC) / Meridian Institute, Dillon (CO) / WBCSD, Conches-Geneva (
  • Hueting, R., Reijnders, L., de Boer, B., Lambooy, J., Jansen, H., 1998. The concept of environmental function and its valuation, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 31-35. [CrossRef]
  • Jackson, L.E., Pascual, U., Hodgkin, T., 2007. Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 3, 196-210. [CrossRef]
  • Kosoy, N., Corbera, E., 2010. Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1228-1236. [CrossRef]
  • Kroeger, T., Casey, F., 2007. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 321-332. [CrossRef]
  • Landell-Mills, N, Porras, T., 2002. Silver Bullet or Fools’ Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and their Impact on the Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development, London (
  • Layke, C., 2009. Measuring Nature’s Benefits: A Preliminary Roadmap for Improving Ecosystem Service Indicators. Working Paper, World Resources Institute, Washington (DC) [].
  • Legrand, T., Le Coq, J.-F., Froger, G., Saenz, F., 2010. Émergence et usages de la notion de service environnemental au Costa Rica : l’exemple du Programme de paiement pour services environnementaux (PPSE). Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-03.
  • Leopold, A., 1949. A Sand County Almanac, and Sketches Here and There, New York, Oxford University Press.
  • Marsh, G.P., 1864. Man and Nature; or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action, New York, C. Scribner.
  • Méral, P., 2010. Les services environnementaux en économie : revue de la littérature. Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-05.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Washington (DC), Island Press (
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Washington (DC), Island Press.
  • Ministère de l’Écologie, de l’Énergie, du Développement durable et de la Mer, 2009. Évaluation des services rendus par les écosystèmes en France : application du Millennium Ecosystem Assessment à la France. Étude exploratoire, synthèse, septembre, Paris.
  • Mooney, H.A., Ehrlich, P.R., 1997. Ecosystem services: A fragmentary history, in Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press, 11-19.
  • Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., May, P.H., 2010. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1202-1208. [CrossRef]
  • Myers, J.P., Reichert, J.S., 1997. Perspective in nature’s services, in Daily, G. (Ed.), Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Island Press, XVII-XX.
  • Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Green, R.E., Lehner, B., Malcolm, T.R., Ricketts, T.H., 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 28, 9495-9500. [CrossRef]
  • Norgaard, R.B., 2010. Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder, Ecological Economics, 69, 6, 1219-1227. [CrossRef]
  • Norgaard, R.B., Bode, C., 1998. Next, the value of God, and other reactions, Ecological Economics, 25, 1, 37-39. [CrossRef]
  • Odum, H.T., 1971. Environment, Power, and Society, New York, Wiley-Interscience.
  • Osborn, F., 1948. Our Plundered Planet, Boston, Little, Brown and Co.
  • Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., Landell-Mills, N., 2002. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Maket-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development, London, Earthscan.
  • Pagiola, S., Platais, G., 2004. Payments for Environmental Services, Environment and Strategy Notes, 3, The World Bank, Washington (DC).
  • Pascual, U., Perrings, C., 2007. Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 121, 3, 256-268. [CrossRef]
  • Passet, R., 1989. L’Économie de l’environnement et de la biosphère, Cahier du C3E.
  • Pearce, D., Moran, D., 1994. The Economic Value of Biodiversity, London, Earthscan.
  • Pearce, D., Bello, T., 1998. Selling Carbon Storage: Background Paper for the Guyana Forest Partnership Initiative (
  • Perrings, C., 2000. The Economics of Biodiversity Conservation in Sub-Saharian Africa: Mending the Ark, Chetelham, Edward Elgar.
  • Pesche, D., Bidaud, C., Dare, W., Hrabanski, M., Massardier, G., Queste, J., 2010. Contributions de la sociologie et de la science politique à la recherche sur les services environnementaux. Programme SERENA, document de travail n° 2010-06 ( article177).
  • Ranganathan J., Munasinghe M., Irwin F., 2008. Policies for Sustainable Governance of Global Ecosystem Services, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
  • Røpke, I., 2005. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s, Ecological Economics, 55, 2, 262-290. [CrossRef]
  • SCEP [Study of Critical Environmental Problems], Matthews, W.H. (Eds), 1970. Man's Impact on the Global Environment: Assessment and Recommendations for Action, Cambridge (MA), The MIT Press.
  • Spash, C.L., 2009. The new environmental pragmatists, pluralism and sustainability, Environmental Values, 18, 3, 253-256. [CrossRef]
  • Swinton, S.M., Lupi, F., Robertson, G.P., Hamilton, S.K., 2007. Ecosystem services and agriculture: Cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 245-252. [CrossRef]
  • TEEB, 2008. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: An Interim Report ( [TEEB Interim Report]).
  • TEEB, 2009. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity for National and International Policy Makers. Summary: Responding to the Value of Nature (
  • TEEB, 2010. TEEB for Business: Executive Summary (
  • Turner, W.R., Brandon, K., Brooks, T.M., Costanza, R., da Fonseca, G.A.B., Portela, R., 2007. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services, Bioscience, 57, 10, 868-873. [CrossRef]
  • Vogt, W., 1948. Road to Survival, New York, W. Sloane Associates.
  • Wallace, K.J., 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions, Biological Conservation, 139, 3-4, 235-246. [CrossRef]
  • Watson, R.T., Dixon, J.A., Hamburg, S.P., Janetos, A.C., Moss, R.H., 1998. Protecting our Planet Securing our Future: Linkages among Global Environmental Issues and Human Needs. UNEP, Nairobi / The World Bank, Wathington (DC) / NASA, Washington (DC).
  • Wunder, S., 2005. Payments for Environmental Services: Some Nuts and Boots. CIFOR Occasional Paper, 42 (
  • Wunder, S., Albán, M., 2008. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador, Ecological Economics, 65, 4, 685-698. [CrossRef]
  • Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremer, C., Carney, K., Swinton, S.M., 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture, Ecological Economics, 64, 2, 253-260. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.