Accès gratuit
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Numéro 1, janvier-mars 2011
Page(s) 56 - 61
Section Libre opinion – Opinion
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011102
Publié en ligne 10 juin 2011
  • Anderson, J.W., 2010. The president’s task force on CCS: it’s going to be pretty expensive, Weathervane, Resources for the Future, August 26. [Google Scholar]
  • Bakker, S., Coninck, H. (de),Groenenberg, H., 2010. Progress on including CCS projects in the CDM: insights on increased awareness, market potential and baseline methodologies, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 2, 321-326. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Bataille, C., Birraux, C., 2006. Rapport sur les nouvelles technologies de l’énergie et la séquestration du dioxyde de carbone : aspects scientifiques et techniques. Rapport de l’Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques, Assemblée nationale, 2965 / Sénat, 254, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Bielicki, J.M., 2008. Returns to scale in carbon capture and storage infrastructure and deployment. Discussion Paper 2008-04, Energy Technology Innovation Policy Research Group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. [Google Scholar]
  • Chaffin, J., 2010. Public wary of carbon capture, The Financial Times, July 30. [Google Scholar]
  • Damian, M., 2010. Le prix international du carbone sera-t-il un jour fixé par la Chine? Économie appliquée, LXIII, 2, 183-190. [Google Scholar]
  • Dooley, J.J., Kim, S.H., Edmonds, J.A, 2004. A first order global geological CO2 storage potential supply curve and its application in a global integrated assessment model, in Rubin, E.S., Keith, D.W., Gilboy, C.F. (Eds), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1, 573-582. [Google Scholar]
  • European Parliament, Council of the European Union, 2009. Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, Official Journal of the European Union, 5.6.2009, L140/114-L140/135. [Google Scholar]
  • Finon, D., 2010. The efficiency of policy instruments for the deployment of CCS as a large-sized technology, Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper 1035, University of Cambridge (soumis à Climate Policy). [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., 2008. Carbon capture and storage, Energy Policy, 36, 4319-4322. [Google Scholar]
  • Herold, J., Rüster, S., Hirschhausen, C. (von), 2010. Carbon capture, transport and storage in Europe: a problematic energy bridge to nowhere? CEPS Working Document 341, Center for European Policy Studies. [Google Scholar]
  • Heuvel, S. (van den), Clingendael International Energy Programme, 2008. Carbon Capture and Storage: A Reality Check for the Netherlands, CIEP Energy Paper, La Haye. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoffert, M.I., Caldeira, K., Benford, G., David, C., Green, C., Herzog, H., Jain, A.K., Kheshgi, H., Lackner, K., Lewis, J., Lighfoot, H.D., Manheimer, W., Mankins, J.C., Mauel, M.E., Perkins, L.J., Schlesinger, M.E., Volk, T., Wigley, T.M.L., 2002. Advanced technology paths to global stability: energy for a greenhouse planet, Science, 298, 5595, 981-987. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2006. Estimating Future Trends in the Cost of CO2Capture Technologies. Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Report 2006/6. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2009a, World Energy Outlook, Paris, IEA/OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2009b. CO2Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option, Paris, IEA/OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2010. Carbon and Capture Storage, Progress and Next Steps. IEA/CSLF Report to the Musoka 2010 G8 Summit, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • IFP, ADEME, BRGM, 2007. CO2Capture and Storage in the Subsurface: A Technological Pathway for Combating Climate Change, Paris/Angers/Orléans, IFP/Ademe/BRGM. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2005. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. IPCC Special Report prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H.C. (de), Loos, M., Meyer, L.A. (Eds)], Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • MIT, 2007. The Future of Coal: Options for a Carbon-Constrained World, an Interdisciplinary Study, Cambridge (Mas.), MIT. [Google Scholar]
  • Newbery, D., Reiner, D., Jamasb, T., Steinberg, R., Toxvaerd, F., Noel, P., 2009. Carbon Capture and Storage: Analysis of Incentives and Rules in a European Repeated Game Situation. Report to the Department for Energy and Climate change, Electricity Policy Research Group, Cambridge University, URN 09D/676. [Google Scholar]
  • Pacala, S., Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, Science, 305, 968-972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perthuis, C. (de), 2009. Et pour quelques degrés de plus... Nos choix économiques face au risque climatique, Paris, Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  • Rubin, E.S., Chen, C., Rao, A.B., 2007. Cost and performances of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage, Energy Policy, 35, 4444-4454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.