Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Number 1, janvier-mars 2011
Page(s) 56 - 61
Section Libre opinion – Opinion
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011102
Published online 10 June 2011
  • Anderson, J.W., 2010. The president’s task force on CCS: it’s going to be pretty expensive, Weathervane, Resources for the Future, August 26. [Google Scholar]
  • Bakker, S., Coninck, H. (de),Groenenberg, H., 2010. Progress on including CCS projects in the CDM: insights on increased awareness, market potential and baseline methodologies, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 4, 2, 321-326. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Bataille, C., Birraux, C., 2006. Rapport sur les nouvelles technologies de l’énergie et la séquestration du dioxyde de carbone : aspects scientifiques et techniques. Rapport de l’Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et technologiques, Assemblée nationale, 2965 / Sénat, 254, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Bielicki, J.M., 2008. Returns to scale in carbon capture and storage infrastructure and deployment. Discussion Paper 2008-04, Energy Technology Innovation Policy Research Group, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. [Google Scholar]
  • Chaffin, J., 2010. Public wary of carbon capture, The Financial Times, July 30. [Google Scholar]
  • Damian, M., 2010. Le prix international du carbone sera-t-il un jour fixé par la Chine? Économie appliquée, LXIII, 2, 183-190. [Google Scholar]
  • Dooley, J.J., Kim, S.H., Edmonds, J.A, 2004. A first order global geological CO2 storage potential supply curve and its application in a global integrated assessment model, in Rubin, E.S., Keith, D.W., Gilboy, C.F. (Eds), Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1, 573-582. [Google Scholar]
  • European Parliament, Council of the European Union, 2009. Directive 2009/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006, Official Journal of the European Union, 5.6.2009, L140/114-L140/135. [Google Scholar]
  • Finon, D., 2010. The efficiency of policy instruments for the deployment of CCS as a large-sized technology, Electricity Policy Research Group Working Paper 1035, University of Cambridge (soumis à Climate Policy). [Google Scholar]
  • Gibbins, J., Chalmers, H., 2008. Carbon capture and storage, Energy Policy, 36, 4319-4322. [Google Scholar]
  • Herold, J., Rüster, S., Hirschhausen, C. (von), 2010. Carbon capture, transport and storage in Europe: a problematic energy bridge to nowhere? CEPS Working Document 341, Center for European Policy Studies. [Google Scholar]
  • Heuvel, S. (van den), Clingendael International Energy Programme, 2008. Carbon Capture and Storage: A Reality Check for the Netherlands, CIEP Energy Paper, La Haye. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoffert, M.I., Caldeira, K., Benford, G., David, C., Green, C., Herzog, H., Jain, A.K., Kheshgi, H., Lackner, K., Lewis, J., Lighfoot, H.D., Manheimer, W., Mankins, J.C., Mauel, M.E., Perkins, L.J., Schlesinger, M.E., Volk, T., Wigley, T.M.L., 2002. Advanced technology paths to global stability: energy for a greenhouse planet, Science, 298, 5595, 981-987. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2006. Estimating Future Trends in the Cost of CO2Capture Technologies. Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Report 2006/6. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2009a, World Energy Outlook, Paris, IEA/OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2009b. CO2Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option, Paris, IEA/OECD. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA, 2010. Carbon and Capture Storage, Progress and Next Steps. IEA/CSLF Report to the Musoka 2010 G8 Summit, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • IFP, ADEME, BRGM, 2007. CO2Capture and Storage in the Subsurface: A Technological Pathway for Combating Climate Change, Paris/Angers/Orléans, IFP/Ademe/BRGM. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC, 2005. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. IPCC Special Report prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Metz, B., Davidson, O., Coninck, H.C. (de), Loos, M., Meyer, L.A. (Eds)], Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • MIT, 2007. The Future of Coal: Options for a Carbon-Constrained World, an Interdisciplinary Study, Cambridge (Mas.), MIT. [Google Scholar]
  • Newbery, D., Reiner, D., Jamasb, T., Steinberg, R., Toxvaerd, F., Noel, P., 2009. Carbon Capture and Storage: Analysis of Incentives and Rules in a European Repeated Game Situation. Report to the Department for Energy and Climate change, Electricity Policy Research Group, Cambridge University, URN 09D/676. [Google Scholar]
  • Pacala, S., Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, Science, 305, 968-972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Perthuis, C. (de), 2009. Et pour quelques degrés de plus... Nos choix économiques face au risque climatique, Paris, Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  • Rubin, E.S., Chen, C., Rao, A.B., 2007. Cost and performances of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage, Energy Policy, 35, 4444-4454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.