Open Access
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 14, Numéro 1, Janvier-Mars 2006
Page(s) 4 - 14
Section Article
Publié en ligne 29 avril 2006
  • Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T., Witmer, R.E., 1976. Land use and land cover classification systems for use with remote sensor data, USGS professional paper 964. [Google Scholar]
  • Attorre, F., Stanisci, A., Bruno, F., 1997. The urban woods of Rome, Plant Biosystems, 131, 113-135. [Google Scholar]
  • Baker, L.A., Hope, D., Xu Y., Edmonds, J., Lauver, L., 2001. Nitrogen balance for the Central Arizona-Phoenix ecosystem, Ecosystems, 4, 582-602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berkowitz, A.R., Nilon, C.H., Holweg, K.S. (Eds), 2003. Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Bormann, F.H., Likens, G.E., 1967. Nutrient cycling, Science, 155, 424-429. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyden, S., Millar, S., Newcombe, K., O'Neill, B., 1981. The Ecology of a City and Its People: The Case of Hong Kong, Canberra, Australian National University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Burch, W.R., Jr., De Luca, D., 1984. Measuring the Social Impact of Natural Resource Policies, Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Burch, W.R., Jr., Grove, J.M., 1993. People, trees, and participation on the urban frontier, Unasylva, 44, 19-27. [Google Scholar]
  • Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Weathers, K.C., Jones, C.G., 2003. A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries, BioScience, 53, 750-758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Grove, J.M., 2006. Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history, Ecological Complexity, 3, 1-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carreiro, M.M., Howe, K., Parkhurst, D.F., Pouyat, R.V., 1999. Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban-rural gradient, Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 258-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cilliers, S.S., Bredenkamp, G.J., 1999. Analysis of the spontaneous vegetation of intensively managed urban open spaces in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North West Province, South Africa, South African Journal of Botany, 65, 59-68. [Google Scholar]
  • Clay, G., 1973. Close Up: How To Read the American City, New York, Praeger Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Cronon, W., 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West, New York, Norton. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm, N.B., Grove, J.M., Pickett, S.T.A., Redman, C.L., 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems, BioScience, 50, 571-584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Groffman, P.M., Bain, D.J., Band, L.E., Belt, K.T., Brush, G.S., Grove, J.M., Pouyat, R.V., Yesilonis, I.C., Zipperer, W.C., 2003. Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology, Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1, 315-321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Groffman, P.M., Crawford, M.K., 2003. Denitrification potential in urban riparian zones, Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1144-1149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Groffman, P.M., Law, N.L., Belt, K.T., Band, L.E., Fisher, G.T., 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems, Ecosystems, 7, 393-403. [Google Scholar]
  • Grove, J.M., Burch, W., Jr., Pickett, S.T.A., 2005. Social Mosaics and Urban Forestry in Baltimore, Maryland, in Lee, R.G., Field, D., Burch, W.R., Jr. (Eds), Community and Forestry: Continuities in the Sociology of Natural Resources, Seattle, University of Washington Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Grove, J.M., Cadenasso, M.L., Burch, W.R., Jr., Pickett, S.T.A., Schwarz, K., Wilson, M.A., Boone, C.G., 2006. Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland, Society and Natural Resources, 19, 2, 117-136. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchings, M.J., John, E.A., Stewart, A.J.A. (Eds), 2000. The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity, Malden (MA), Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities: The Failure of Town Planning, New York, Random House. [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy, V.S., Mountford, K., 2001. Human influences on aquatic resources in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, in Curtin, P.D., Brush, G.S., Fisher, G.W. (Eds), Discovering the Chesapeake: The History of an Ecosystem, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 191-219. [Google Scholar]
  • Kent, M., Stevens, R.A., Zhang, L., 1999. Urban plant ecology patterns and processes: a case study of the flora of the City of Plymouth, Devon, UK, Journal of Biogeography, 26, 1281-1298 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Law, N.L., Band, L.E., Grove, J.M., 2004. Nitrogen input from residential lawn care practices in suburban neighborhoods in Baltimore County, Maryland, Journal of Environmental Management, 47, 737-755. [Google Scholar]
  • Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., 1995. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem, 2nd edition, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Lovett, G.M., Traynor, M.M., Pouyat, R.V., Carreiro, M.M., Zhu, W., Baxter, J.W., 2000. Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban-rural gradient, Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 4294-4300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lowrance, R., Todd, R., Fail, J., Jr., Hendrickson, O., Jr., Leonard R., Asmussen, L., 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds, BioScience, 34, 374-377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Machlis, G.E., Force, J.E., Burch, W.R., Jr., 1997. The human ecosystem, Part I: the human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management, Society and Natural Resources, 10, 4, 347-367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maryland Department of Planning, 1999. Multi-resolution land characteristics, Maryland property view. Annapolis, Maryland. [Google Scholar]
  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology, Ecology, 71, 1232-1237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Pouyat, R.V., Parmelee, R.W., Carreiro, M.M., 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient, Urban Ecosystems, 1, 21-36. [Google Scholar]
  • McIntyre, N.E., Knowles-Yanez, K., Hope, D., 2000. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences, Urban Ecosystems, 4, 5-24. [Google Scholar]
  • Medley, K.E., McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., 1995. Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient, Professional Geographer, 47, 159-168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naiman, R.J., Décamps, H., 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 621-658. [Google Scholar]
  • Nilon, C. H., Berkowitz, A. R., Hollweg, K. S., 2003. Introduction: ecosystem understanding is a key to understanding cities, in Berkowitz, A.R., Nilon, C.H., Hollweg, K.S. (Eds), Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  • Peterjohn, W.T., Correll, D.L., 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest, Ecology, 65, 1466-1475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S. (Eds), 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Orlando (FL), Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickett, S.T.A., Burch, W.R., Jr., Dalton, S.D., Foresman, T.W., 1997. Integrated urban ecosystem research, Urban Ecosystems, 1, 183-184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Costanza, R., 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pouyat, R.V., McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., 1997. Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient, Urban Ecosystems, 1, 117-131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stearns, F., Montag, T., 1974. The Urban Ecosystem: A Holistic Approach, Stroudsburg (PA), Dowden Hutchinson & Ross. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinberg, D.A., Pouyat, R.V., Parmelee, R.W., Groffman, P.M., 1997. Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban-rural land use gradient, Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry, 29, 427-430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sukopp, H., Hejny, S., Kowarik, I. (Eds), 1990. Urban Ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environments, The Hague, SPB Academic Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Theobald, D.M., 2004. Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework, Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 2, 139-144. [Google Scholar]
  • United Nations, 2001. Demographic Yearbook, New York, United Nations Statistics Division. [Google Scholar]
  • US Census Bureau, 1995. Urban and Rural Definitions. [Google Scholar]
  • Vincent, G., Bergeron, Y., 1985. Weed synecology and dynamics in urban environment, Urban Ecology, 9, 161-175. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu, W.X., Barreiro, M.M., 1999. Chemoautotrophic nitrification in acidic soils along an urban-to-rural transect, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1091-1100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.