Free Access
Issue
Natures Sciences Sociétés
Volume 14, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2006
Page(s) 4 - 14
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2006002
Published online 29 April 2006
  • Anderson, J.R., Hardy, E.E., Roach, J.T., Witmer, R.E., 1976. Land use and land cover classification systems for use with remote sensor data, USGS professional paper 964. [Google Scholar]
  • Attorre, F., Stanisci, A., Bruno, F., 1997. The urban woods of Rome, Plant Biosystems, 131, 113-135. [Google Scholar]
  • Baker, L.A., Hope, D., Xu Y., Edmonds, J., Lauver, L., 2001. Nitrogen balance for the Central Arizona-Phoenix ecosystem, Ecosystems, 4, 582-602 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berkowitz, A.R., Nilon, C.H., Holweg, K.S. (Eds), 2003. Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Bormann, F.H., Likens, G.E., 1967. Nutrient cycling, Science, 155, 424-429. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyden, S., Millar, S., Newcombe, K., O'Neill, B., 1981. The Ecology of a City and Its People: The Case of Hong Kong, Canberra, Australian National University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Burch, W.R., Jr., De Luca, D., 1984. Measuring the Social Impact of Natural Resource Policies, Albuquerque, University of New Mexico Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Burch, W.R., Jr., Grove, J.M., 1993. People, trees, and participation on the urban frontier, Unasylva, 44, 19-27. [Google Scholar]
  • Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Weathers, K.C., Jones, C.G., 2003. A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries, BioScience, 53, 750-758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cadenasso, M.L., Pickett, S.T.A., Grove, J.M., 2006. Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history, Ecological Complexity, 3, 1-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carreiro, M.M., Howe, K., Parkhurst, D.F., Pouyat, R.V., 1999. Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban-rural gradient, Biology and Fertility of Soils, 30, 258-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cilliers, S.S., Bredenkamp, G.J., 1999. Analysis of the spontaneous vegetation of intensively managed urban open spaces in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North West Province, South Africa, South African Journal of Botany, 65, 59-68. [Google Scholar]
  • Clay, G., 1973. Close Up: How To Read the American City, New York, Praeger Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Cronon, W., 1991. Nature's Metropolis: Chicago and the Great West, New York, Norton. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimm, N.B., Grove, J.M., Pickett, S.T.A., Redman, C.L., 2000. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems, BioScience, 50, 571-584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Groffman, P.M., Bain, D.J., Band, L.E., Belt, K.T., Brush, G.S., Grove, J.M., Pouyat, R.V., Yesilonis, I.C., Zipperer, W.C., 2003. Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology, Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 1, 315-321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Groffman, P.M., Crawford, M.K., 2003. Denitrification potential in urban riparian zones, Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 1144-1149. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Groffman, P.M., Law, N.L., Belt, K.T., Band, L.E., Fisher, G.T., 2004. Nitrogen fluxes and retention in urban watershed ecosystems, Ecosystems, 7, 393-403. [Google Scholar]
  • Grove, J.M., Burch, W., Jr., Pickett, S.T.A., 2005. Social Mosaics and Urban Forestry in Baltimore, Maryland, in Lee, R.G., Field, D., Burch, W.R., Jr. (Eds), Community and Forestry: Continuities in the Sociology of Natural Resources, Seattle, University of Washington Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Grove, J.M., Cadenasso, M.L., Burch, W.R., Jr., Pickett, S.T.A., Schwarz, K., Wilson, M.A., Boone, C.G., 2006. Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland, Society and Natural Resources, 19, 2, 117-136. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchings, M.J., John, E.A., Stewart, A.J.A. (Eds), 2000. The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity, Malden (MA), Blackwell Science. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs, J., 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities: The Failure of Town Planning, New York, Random House. [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy, V.S., Mountford, K., 2001. Human influences on aquatic resources in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, in Curtin, P.D., Brush, G.S., Fisher, G.W. (Eds), Discovering the Chesapeake: The History of an Ecosystem, Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 191-219. [Google Scholar]
  • Kent, M., Stevens, R.A., Zhang, L., 1999. Urban plant ecology patterns and processes: a case study of the flora of the City of Plymouth, Devon, UK, Journal of Biogeography, 26, 1281-1298 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Law, N.L., Band, L.E., Grove, J.M., 2004. Nitrogen input from residential lawn care practices in suburban neighborhoods in Baltimore County, Maryland, Journal of Environmental Management, 47, 737-755. [Google Scholar]
  • Likens, G.E., Bormann, F.H., 1995. Biogeochemistry of a Forested Ecosystem, 2nd edition, New York, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Lovett, G.M., Traynor, M.M., Pouyat, R.V., Carreiro, M.M., Zhu, W., Baxter, J.W., 2000. Atmospheric deposition to oak forests along an urban-rural gradient, Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 4294-4300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lowrance, R., Todd, R., Fail, J., Jr., Hendrickson, O., Jr., Leonard R., Asmussen, L., 1984. Riparian forests as nutrient filters in agricultural watersheds, BioScience, 34, 374-377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Machlis, G.E., Force, J.E., Burch, W.R., Jr., 1997. The human ecosystem, Part I: the human ecosystem as an organizing concept in ecosystem management, Society and Natural Resources, 10, 4, 347-367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maryland Department of Planning, 1999. Multi-resolution land characteristics, Maryland property view. Annapolis, Maryland. [Google Scholar]
  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., 1990. Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology, Ecology, 71, 1232-1237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., Pouyat, R.V., Parmelee, R.W., Carreiro, M.M., 1997. Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient, Urban Ecosystems, 1, 21-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McIntyre, N.E., Knowles-Yanez, K., Hope, D., 2000. Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences, Urban Ecosystems, 4, 5-24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Medley, K.E., McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., 1995. Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient, Professional Geographer, 47, 159-168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Naiman, R.J., Décamps, H., 1997. The ecology of interfaces: riparian zones, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 621-658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nilon, C. H., Berkowitz, A. R., Hollweg, K. S., 2003. Introduction: ecosystem understanding is a key to understanding cities, in Berkowitz, A.R., Nilon, C.H., Hollweg, K.S. (Eds), Understanding Urban Ecosystems: A New Frontier for Science and Education, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1-13. [Google Scholar]
  • Peterjohn, W.T., Correll, D.L., 1984. Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: observations on the role of a riparian forest, Ecology, 65, 1466-1475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickett, S.T.A., White, P.S. (Eds), 1985. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, Orlando (FL), Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Pickett, S.T.A., Burch, W.R., Jr., Dalton, S.D., Foresman, T.W., 1997. Integrated urban ecosystem research, Urban Ecosystems, 1, 183-184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickett, S.T.A., Cadenasso, M.L., Grove, J.M., Nilon, C.H., Pouyat, R.V., Zipperer, W.C., Costanza, R., 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pouyat, R.V., McDonnell, M.J., Pickett, S.T.A., 1997. Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban-rural land use gradient, Urban Ecosystems, 1, 117-131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stearns, F., Montag, T., 1974. The Urban Ecosystem: A Holistic Approach, Stroudsburg (PA), Dowden Hutchinson & Ross. [Google Scholar]
  • Steinberg, D.A., Pouyat, R.V., Parmelee, R.W., Groffman, P.M., 1997. Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban-rural land use gradient, Soil Biology and Biogeochemistry, 29, 427-430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sukopp, H., Hejny, S., Kowarik, I. (Eds), 1990. Urban Ecology: Plants and Plant Communities in Urban Environments, The Hague, SPB Academic Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Theobald, D.M., 2004. Placing exurban land-use change in a human modification framework, Frontiers in Ecology and Environment, 2, 139-144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • United Nations, 2001. Demographic Yearbook, New York, United Nations Statistics Division. [Google Scholar]
  • US Census Bureau, 1995. Urban and Rural Definitions. [Google Scholar]
  • Vincent, G., Bergeron, Y., 1985. Weed synecology and dynamics in urban environment, Urban Ecology, 9, 161-175. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu, W.X., Barreiro, M.M., 1999. Chemoautotrophic nitrification in acidic soils along an urban-to-rural transect, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 31, 1091-1100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.