Accès gratuit
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 12, Numéro 1, Janvier-Mars 2004
Page(s) 30 - 41
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2004004
Publié en ligne 7 avril 2004
  • Aldred, J., Jacobs, M., 2000. Citizens and Wetlands: Evaluating the Ely Citizens' Jury, Ecological Economics, 34, 217-232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Armour, A., 1996. The Citizens' Jury Model of Public Participation, in Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (Eds), Fairness and competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Dordrecht, Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour, R., Kitzinger, J. (Eds), 1999. Developing Focus Group Research, Newbury Park, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Beierle, T.C., 2000. La qualité des décisions impliquant des stakeholders : leçons à partir de cas d'études, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. “Discussion Paper", 00-56. [Google Scholar]
  • Callon, M., 1998. Des différentes formes de démocratie technique, Annales des Mines, 9, 63-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Commission européenne, 2001. Livre vert "Promouvoir un cadre européen pour la responsabilité sociale des entreprises", COM (2001) 366 final, juillet. [Google Scholar]
  • Faucheux, S., Hue, C., Nicolaï, I., O'Connor, M., 2002a. Integration of the Social Dimension of Sustainable Development in Enterprise Strategies within the Aluminium Industry, C3ED final report, EAA Programme “Aluminium for Future Generations", Guyancourt, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Faucheux, S., Hue, Ch., Petit, O., 2002b. NTIC et Environnement, enjeux, risques et opportunités, Futuribles, 273, 3-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Faucheux, S., O'Connor, M., Spangenberg, J., de Marchi, B., 2003. Implementation of a System of Indicators for Social Responsibility Reporting, C3ED final report, EAA Programme “Aluminium for Future Generations”, Guyancourt, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Boston, Pitman/Ballinger. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the Post-Normal Age, Futures, 25, 7, 735-755. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Global Reporting Initiative, 2000. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance, June. [Google Scholar]
  • Global Reporting Initiative, 2002. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, http://www.globalreporting.org/ GRIGuidelines/2002/gri_2002_guidelines.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Habermas, J., 1986 [1983]. Morale et communication, Paris, Les Éditions du Cerf, trad. de Moralbewusstsein und Kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Haites F., Yamin F., 2000. The Clean Development Mechanism: proposal for its operation and governance, Global Environmental Change, Part A, 10, 1, 27-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lunheim, R., 2001. Taking social responsibility to the world, Profile, 2, Norsk Hydro, May. [Google Scholar]
  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O.C., 2003. Nature of corporate responsibilities ; Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers, Journal of Business Research, 56, 55-67. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchi, B. de, Funtowicz, S., GuimaraesPereira, A., 2000a. From the Right to Be Informed to the Right to Participate: Responding to the Evolution of the European Legislation with ICT, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15, 1, 1-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchi, B. de, Funtowicz, S., Lo Cascio, S., Munda, G., 2000b. Combining Participative and Institutional Approaches with Multicriteria Evaluation. An Empirical Study for Water Issues in Troina, Sicily, Ecological Economics, 34, 267-282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell, R.C., Carson R., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Methods, Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J., 1997. Towards a Theory of stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review, 22, 4, 853-86. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., Van den Hove, S., 2001. Prospects for Concertation on Nuclear Risks and Technological Options: Innovations in Governance Practices for Sustainable Development in the European Union, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86, 77-99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., Meite, V. (Eds), 2004 forthcoming. Environmental Evaluation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Renn, O., Webber, T., Rakel, H., Daniel, P., Johnson, B., 1993. Public Participation in Decision-Making: a Three-step Procedure, Policy Sciences, 26, 3, 189-214. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P., 1990. Focus Groups. Theory and Practice, Newbury Park, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Van den Hove, S., 2001. Approches participatives pour la gouvernance en matière de développement durable: une analyse en termes d'effets, in Froger, G. (Ed.), Gouvernance et développement durable, Bâle/Genève/Munich, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 53-89. [Google Scholar]
  • WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development), 1999. Meeting Changing Expectations: Corporate Social Responsibility, progress report, March 1999, http://www.wbcsd.org. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.