Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 12, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2004
Page(s) 30 - 41
Section Article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2004004
Published online 07 April 2004
  • Aldred, J., Jacobs, M., 2000. Citizens and Wetlands: Evaluating the Ely Citizens' Jury, Ecological Economics, 34, 217-232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Armour, A., 1996. The Citizens' Jury Model of Public Participation, in Renn, O., Webler, T., Wiedemann, P. (Eds), Fairness and competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, Dordrecht, Kluwer. [Google Scholar]
  • Barbour, R., Kitzinger, J. (Eds), 1999. Developing Focus Group Research, Newbury Park, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Beierle, T.C., 2000. La qualité des décisions impliquant des stakeholders : leçons à partir de cas d'études, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. “Discussion Paper", 00-56. [Google Scholar]
  • Callon, M., 1998. Des différentes formes de démocratie technique, Annales des Mines, 9, 63-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Commission européenne, 2001. Livre vert "Promouvoir un cadre européen pour la responsabilité sociale des entreprises", COM (2001) 366 final, juillet. [Google Scholar]
  • Faucheux, S., Hue, C., Nicolaï, I., O'Connor, M., 2002a. Integration of the Social Dimension of Sustainable Development in Enterprise Strategies within the Aluminium Industry, C3ED final report, EAA Programme “Aluminium for Future Generations", Guyancourt, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Faucheux, S., Hue, Ch., Petit, O., 2002b. NTIC et Environnement, enjeux, risques et opportunités, Futuribles, 273, 3-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Faucheux, S., O'Connor, M., Spangenberg, J., de Marchi, B., 2003. Implementation of a System of Indicators for Social Responsibility Reporting, C3ED final report, EAA Programme “Aluminium for Future Generations”, Guyancourt, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Boston, Pitman/Ballinger. [Google Scholar]
  • Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J., 1993. Science for the Post-Normal Age, Futures, 25, 7, 735-755. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Global Reporting Initiative, 2000. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance, June. [Google Scholar]
  • Global Reporting Initiative, 2002. Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, http://www.globalreporting.org/ GRIGuidelines/2002/gri_2002_guidelines.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Habermas, J., 1986 [1983]. Morale et communication, Paris, Les Éditions du Cerf, trad. de Moralbewusstsein und Kommunikatives Handeln, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  • Haites F., Yamin F., 2000. The Clean Development Mechanism: proposal for its operation and governance, Global Environmental Change, Part A, 10, 1, 27-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lunheim, R., 2001. Taking social responsibility to the world, Profile, 2, Norsk Hydro, May. [Google Scholar]
  • Maignan, I., Ferrell, O.C., 2003. Nature of corporate responsibilities ; Perspectives from American, French, and German consumers, Journal of Business Research, 56, 55-67. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchi, B. de, Funtowicz, S., GuimaraesPereira, A., 2000a. From the Right to Be Informed to the Right to Participate: Responding to the Evolution of the European Legislation with ICT, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 15, 1, 1-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchi, B. de, Funtowicz, S., Lo Cascio, S., Munda, G., 2000b. Combining Participative and Institutional Approaches with Multicriteria Evaluation. An Empirical Study for Water Issues in Troina, Sicily, Ecological Economics, 34, 267-282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell, R.C., Carson R., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Methods, Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., Wood, D.J., 1997. Towards a Theory of stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the principle of Who and What Really Counts, Academy of Management Review, 22, 4, 853-86. [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., Van den Hove, S., 2001. Prospects for Concertation on Nuclear Risks and Technological Options: Innovations in Governance Practices for Sustainable Development in the European Union, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86, 77-99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Connor, M., Meite, V. (Eds), 2004 forthcoming. Environmental Evaluation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  • Renn, O., Webber, T., Rakel, H., Daniel, P., Johnson, B., 1993. Public Participation in Decision-Making: a Three-step Procedure, Policy Sciences, 26, 3, 189-214. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stewart, D., Shamdasani, P., 1990. Focus Groups. Theory and Practice, Newbury Park, Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Van den Hove, S., 2001. Approches participatives pour la gouvernance en matière de développement durable: une analyse en termes d'effets, in Froger, G. (Ed.), Gouvernance et développement durable, Bâle/Genève/Munich, Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 53-89. [Google Scholar]
  • WBCSD (World Business Council for Sustainable Development), 1999. Meeting Changing Expectations: Corporate Social Responsibility, progress report, March 1999, http://www.wbcsd.org. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.