Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 12, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2004
Page(s) 42 - 49
Section Forum
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2004005
Published online 07 April 2004
  • Allègre, C., 2002. Écologie – L'état de la planète ou la conscience sans science, L'Express, 22 août.
  • Bongaarts, J., 2002. Population: ignoring its impact, Scientific American, 286, 6769.
  • Brimblecombe, P., 1977. London air pollution, 1500-1900, Atmospheric Environment, 11, 1157-1162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Budiansky, S., 2002. Divisionary tactics in environmental debate, Nature, 415, 364. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Burgman, M., 2002. The Skeptical Environmentalist. Measuring the Real State of the World, Austral Ecology, 27, 238-239. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Chadwick, M.J., 2002. The Skeptical Environmentalist. Measuring the Real State of the World, Climate Policy, 2, 259-261.
  • Cole, M.A., 2003. Environmental optimists, environmental pessimists and the real state of the world: An article examining The skeptical environmentalist: Measuring the real state of the world by Bjorn Lomborg, The Economic Journal, 113 (June), 362-380. [CrossRef]
  • Czech, B., 2000. Julian Simon Redux. Conservation Biology, 16, 2, April 2002, 570-571. [CrossRef]
  • Dagg, J.L., 2003. The Skeptical Environmentalist and the Lomborg Affair, Environmental Science & Policy, 6, 4, sous presse. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Ege, C., Lind Christiansen, J., 2002. Sceptical Questions and Sustainable Answers, Copenhaguen, Danish Ecological Council.
  • Faucheux, S., Noël, J.F., 1995. Économie des ressources naturelles et de l'environnement, Paris, Armand Colin.
  • Godard, O., 2002. Bjørn Lomborg ou Tintin au pays de l'écologie ? Une revue critique du livre de Bjørn Lomborg, The Skeptical Environmentalist, Politique étrangère, IFRI.
  • Granja e Barros, F., Mendoça, A.F., Nogueira, J.M., 2002. Poverty and Environmental Degradation: the Kuznets Environmental Curve for the Brazilian Case, Department of Economics Working paper, 267, University of Brasilia.
  • Grubb, M., 2001. Relying on Manna from Heaven, Science, 294, 1285-1286. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A. and Wilson, D.M., 2002. Reexamining the Empirical Evidence for an Environmental Kuznets Curve, The Review of Economics and Statistics, July (http://harbaugh.uoregon.edu/index.htm#Research).
  • Holdren, J., 2002. Energy: asking the wrong questions, Scientific American, 286, 6567.
  • Keyfitz, N., 1994. Croissance démographique : qui peut en évaluer les limites ?, La Recherche, 264, 25.
  • Lefohn, A.S., Husar, J.D. and Husar, R.B., 1999. Estimating Historical Anthropogenic Global Sulfur Emission Patterns for the Period 1850-1990, Atmospheric Environment, 33, 3425-2444 (données disponibles sur http://www.uea.ac.uk/∼e490/su/sulfur.htm). [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Lovejoy, T., 2002. Biodiversity: dismissing scientific process, Scientific American, 286, 1, 6971.
  • Moomaw, W.R., 2002. Lomborg's The Skeptical Environmentalist : Refuting a Scientific Model without Science, Conservation Biology, 16, 4, 861-862. [CrossRef]
  • Orr, D.W., 2002. The Labor of Sisyphus, Conservation Biology, 16, 4, 857-860. [CrossRef]
  • Pauly, D., 2002. The Skeptical Environmentalist. Measuring the Real State of the World, Fisheries, 3, 360-365.
  • Pielke, Jr., R.A., 2002. Policy, politics and perspective, Nature, 416, 367-368. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Pimm, S. and Harvey, J., 2001. No need to worry about the Future, Nature, 414, 149-150. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Reed, D. (Ed.) 1999. Ajustement structurel, environnement et développement durable, Paris, L'Harmattan.
  • Ridley, M., 2002. The profits of doom, Spectator, 288, 1011.
  • Schneider, S., 2002. Global warming: neglecting the complexities, Scientific American, 286, 6265. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed]
  • Sen, A., 1999. Un nouveau modèle économique. Développement, justice, liberté, Paris, Odile Jacob.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.