Free Access
Publication ahead of print
Journal
Nat. Sci. Soc.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2020005
Published online 04 March 2020
  • Anderson J.H., 2000. The third generation of the Frankfurt School, Intellectual History Newsletter, 22, 49-61. [Google Scholar]
  • Bales E., 2009. An element of uncertainty: radon and the quantification of risk in 20th-century America, 1945-2000. PhD dissertation, Berkeley, University of California Berkeley. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck U., 1986. Risikogesellschaft. Aufdem weg in eine andere moderne, Frankfurt-Am-Main, Suhrkamp. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity, London, Sage. [Google Scholar]
  • Beck U., 2003. La société du risque. Sur la voie d’une autre modernité, Paris, Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
  • Benamouzig D., Besançon J., 2005. Administrer un monde incertain : les nouvelles bureaucraties techniques. Le cas des agences sanitaires en France, Sociologie du travail, 47, 3, 301-322, doi: 10.1016/j.soctra.2005.06.001. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudia S., 2009. Les problèmes de santé publique de longue durée. Les effets des faibles doses de radioactivité, in Henry E., Gilbert C. (Eds), Comment se construisent les problèmes de santé publique, Paris, La Découverte, 37-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudia S., 2010. Gouverner les risques et par le risque. Pour une histoire du risque et de la société du risque. Thèse d’habilitation à diriger des recherches, Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudia S., Jas N., 2019, Gouverner un monde toxique, Versailles, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudia S., Demortain D., 2014. La production d’un instrument générique de gouvernement. Le « livre rouge » de l’analyse des risques, Gouvernement & Action Publique, 3, 3, 33-53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burgess A., 2006. The making of the risk-centred society and the limits of social risk research, Health, Risk & Society, 8, 4, 329-342, doi: 10.1080/13698570601008321. [Google Scholar]
  • Buton F., Pierru F., 2012. Instituer la police des risques sanitaires. Mise en circulation de l’épidémiologie appliquée et agencification de l’État sanitaire, Gouvernement & Action Publique, 4, 67-90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Collins H.M., 1981. The place of the ‘core-set’ in modern science: social contingency with methodological propriety in science, History of Science, 19, 6-19, doi: 10.1177/007327538101900102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daccache M., 2006. En quête d’existence. L’émergence de la fonction de risk manager dans les entreprises, Regards sociologiques, 32, 37-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Dean M., 1999. Risk, calculable and incalculable in Lupton D. (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: new directions and perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 131-59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Marchi B., 2001. Preface, Special Issue on Risk and Governance, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 86, 1-3, doi: 10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00246-1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Demortain D., 2009. Standards of scientific advice. Risk analysis and the formation of the European Food Safety Authority, in Lentsch J., Weingart P. (Eds), Scientific advice to policy making: international comparison, Opladen/Farmington Hills, Barbara Budrich. [Google Scholar]
  • Demortain D., 2011. Scientists and the regulation of risk. Standardising control, Cheltenham (UK)/Northampton (MA), Edward Elgar. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demortain D., 2013. Regulatory toxicology in controversy, Science Technology, & Human Values, 38, 6, 727-748, doi: 10.1177/0162243913490201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Demortain D., 2015. Comment faire preuve en régime de controverse ? Retour sur l’évaluation des OGM, Hermès, 73, 3, 122-128, www.cairn.info/revue-hermes-la-revue-2015-3-page-122.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Demortain D., 2016. The work of making risk frameworks, in Power M. (Ed.), Riskwork. Essays on the organizational life of risk management, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Demortain D., 2020. The science of bureaucracy. Risk decision-making and the US Environmental Protection Agency, Cambridge (MA)/London, The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Dietz T., Rycroft R.W., 1987. The risk professionals, New York, Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar]
  • Douglas M., 1990. Risk as a forensic resource, Daedalus, 119, 4, 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  • Douglas M., 1992. Risk and blame, in Douglas M., Risk and blame. Essays in cultural theory, London/New York, Routledge, 3-21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Duclos D., 1996. Puissance et faiblesse du concept de risque, L’Année sociologique, 46, 2, 309-337. [Google Scholar]
  • Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B., 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits, Policy sciences, 9, 2, 127-152, doi: 10.1007/BF00143739. [Google Scholar]
  • Guénard F., Simay P., 2011. Du risque à la catastrophe. À propos d’un nouveau paradigme, La vie des idées, www.laviedesidees.fr/Du-risque-a-la-catastrophe.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Habermas J., 1990. La technique et la science comme « idéologie », Paris, Gallimard. Traduit de : Technik und wissenschaft als « ideologie », Frankfurt-Am-Main, Suhrkamp, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • Hacking I., 2003. Risk and dirt, in Ericson R.V., Doyle A. (Eds), Risk and morality, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 22-47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hauray B., 2005. Politique et expertise scientifique. La régulation européenne des médicaments, Sociologie du travail, 47, 1, 57-75, doi: 10.1016/j.soctra.2004.12.003. [Google Scholar]
  • Hayns M.R., 1999. The evolution of probabilistic risk assessment in the nuclear industry, Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 77, 3, 117-142, doi: 10.1205/095758299529947. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hood C., Jones D.K.C., 1996. Accident and design: contemporary debates in risk management, London, UCL Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hood C., Rothstein H., Baldwin R., 2001. The government of risk: understanding risk regulation regimes, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Jardine C., Hurdey S., Shortreed J., Craig L., Krewski D., Furgal C., McColl S., 2003. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health Part B: Critical Reviews, 6, 6, 569-718, doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff S., 1992. Science, politics, and the renegotiation of expertise at EPA, Osiris, 7, 194-217, doi: 10.1086/368710. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasanoff S., 1999. The songlines of risk, Environmental values, 8, 2, 135-152, doi: 10.3197/096327199129341761. [Google Scholar]
  • Kates R.W., Kasperson J.X., 1983. Comparative risk analysis of technological hazards (a review), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 80, 22, 7027-7038, doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.22.7027. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lowrance W.W., 1976. Of acceptable risk: science and the determination of safety, Los Altos (California), W. Kaufman. [Google Scholar]
  • Marcuse H., 1968. L’homme unidimensionnel : essai sur l’idéologie de la société industrielle avancée, Paris, Éditions de Minuit. [Google Scholar]
  • National Research Council, 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process, Washington (DC), National Academies Press, doi: 10.17226/366. [Google Scholar]
  • Nelkin D., 1975. The political impact of technical expertise, Social Studies of Science, 5, 1, 35-54. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Malley P., 2004. Risk, uncertainty, and government, London, GlassHouse. [Google Scholar]
  • Papaux A., 2013. De la société du risque à la société de la menace, in Bourg D., Joly P.B., Kaufmann A. (Eds), Du risque à la menace. Penser la catastrophe, Paris, Presses universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
  • Peretti-Watel P., 2010. La société du risque, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
  • Perrow C., 1982. Not risk but power, Contemporary Sociology, 11, 3, 298-300. [Google Scholar]
  • Power M., 1997. The audit society: rituals of verification, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Rip A., 1986. The mutual dependence of risk research and political context, Science & Technology Studies, 4, 3-4, 3-15. [Google Scholar]
  • Rowe W.D., 1977. An anatomy of risk, New York, Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  • Rushefsky M.E., 1986. Making cancer policy, Albany, State University of New York Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Short J.F., 1992. Defining, explaining and managing risks, in Short J.F., Jr, Clarke L. (Eds), Organizations, uncertainties and risk, Boulder, Westview Press, 3-23. [Google Scholar]
  • Starr C., 1969. Social benefit versus technological risk, Science, 165, 3899, 1232-1238, doi: 10.1126/science.165.3899.1232. [Google Scholar]
  • Thompson K.M., Deisler P.F., Jr, Schwing R.C., 2005. Interdisciplinary vision: the first 25 years of the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA), 1980-2005, Risk Analysis, 25, 6, 1333-1386, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00702.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne B., 1984. ‘ “Mandated science”: a workshop and project report Vancouver, Canada, April 1984’, 4S Review, 2, 2, 3-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne B., 1989. Establishing the rules of laws: constructing expert authority, in Smith R., Wynne B. (Eds), Expert evidence: interpreting science in the law, London/New York, Routledge, 23-55. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.