Open Access
| Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 32, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2024
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 393 - 409 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2025017 | |
| Published online | 05 May 2025 | |
- Alphandéry P., Fortier A., 2011. Les associations dans le processus de rationalisation des données naturalistes, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 19, 1, 22-30, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011101. [Google Scholar]
- Berny N., 2019. Défendre la cause de l’environnement. une approche organisationnelle, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bonney R., Cooper C.B., Dickinson J., Kelling S., Phillips T., Rosenberg K.V., Shirk J., 2009. Citizen science: a developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy, BioScience, 59, 11, 977-984, https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.11.9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bourdieu P., 1979. La distinction, Paris, Minuit. [Google Scholar]
- Bowker G., Star S.L., 1999. Sorting things out, Cambridge (Mass.), The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Charvolin F., Micoud A., Nyhart L.K. (Eds), 2007. Des sciences citoyennes ? La question de l’amateur dans les sciences naturalistes, La Tour d’Aigues, Éditions de l’Aube. [Google Scholar]
- Charvolin F., 2019. Les sciences participatives au secours de la biodiversité, Paris, éditions Rue d’Ulm. [Google Scholar]
- Charvolin F., 2022. Faune France. Amateur naturalists’ attachment and indebtedness in a citizen science biodiversity database, Science as Culture, 33, 3, 321-341. [Google Scholar]
- Cooper CB., Shirk J., Zuckerberg B., 2014. The invisible prevalence of citizen science in global research: migratory birds and climate change, PLOS One, 9, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106508. [Google Scholar]
- Demeulenaere E., 2019. Savoirs paysans et conservation des ressources génétiques. Réductionnisme stratégique et réflexivité, Anthropologie et sociétés, 43, 3, 167-192, https://doi.org/10.7202/1070153ar. [Google Scholar]
- Duféal M., Jonchères C., Noucher M., 2016. Ecce carto- Des espaces de la contribution à la contribution de l’espace − Profils, pratiques et valeurs d’engagement des contributeurs d’OpenStreetMap (OSM) (version disponible sur Hal-SHS, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01371544/document). [Google Scholar]
- Edwards P.N., Mayernik M.S., Borgman C.L., 2011. Science friction: data, metadata, and collaboration, Social Studies of Science, 41, 5, 667-690, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711413314. [Google Scholar]
- Gabrys J., Pritchard H., Barratt B., 2016. Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories, Big Data & Society, 3, 2, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677. [Google Scholar]
- Goodchild M.F., 2007. Citizens as sensors; the world of volunteered geography, GeoJournal, 69, 4, 211‑221. [Google Scholar]
- Haklay M., Budhathoki N., 2010. OpenStreetMap. Overview and motivational factors, in Horizon infrastructure challenge theme day, March 19, University of Nottingham, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/42a1/9aff0a884fa5bce0ca184dde640adbad3068.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Hayat F., 2019. Production des biens communs numériques et usages cartographiques. Thèse de doctorat en géographie et géomatique, Paris, Université Paris Cité, https://theses.hal.science/tel-03117730. [Google Scholar]
- Herfort B., Lautenbach S., Porto de Albuquerque J., Anderson J., Zipf A., 2023. A spatio-temporal analysis investigating completeness and inequalities of global urban building data in OpenStreetMap, Nature Commununications, 14, 3985, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-39698-6. [Google Scholar]
- Hochachka W.M., Fink D., Hutchinson R.A., Sheldon D., Wong W.K., Kelling S., 2012. Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 2, 130-137, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006. [Google Scholar]
- Jennett C., Kloetzer L., Schneider D., Iacovides I., Cox A., Gold M., Fuchs B., Eveleigh A., Mathieu K., Ajani Z. et al., 2016. Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science, Journal of Science Communication, 15, 3, A05, https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15030205. [Google Scholar]
- Joliveau T., Noucher M., Roche S., 2013. La cartographie 2.0, vers une approche critique d’un nouveau régime cartographique, L’Information géographique, 4, 12, 29‑46, https://doi.org/10.3917/lig.774.0029. [Google Scholar]
- Kimura A.H., Kinchy A.J., 2019. Science by the people. Participation, power, and the politics of environmental knowledge, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Kitchin R., 2014. The data revolution, Londres, Sage. [Google Scholar]
- Levrel H., Fontaine B., Henry P.-Y., Jiguet F., Julliard R., Kerbiriou C., Couvet D., 2010. Balancing state and volunteer investment in biodiversity monitoring for implementation of CDB indicators. A French example, Ecological Economics, 69, 7, 80-86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.001. [Google Scholar]
- Manceron V., 2015. « Avant que nature meure »… inventorier. Le cas des naturalistes amateurs en Angleterre, Ethnologie française, 45, 1, 31-43, https://doi.org/10.3917/ethn.151.0031. [Google Scholar]
- Manceron V., 2022. Les veilleurs du vivant. Avec les naturalistes amateurs, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
- Millerand F., Bowker G.C., 2009. Metadata standards, trajectories and enactment in the life of an ontology, in Star S.L., Lampland M. (Eds), Standards and their stories. How quantifying, classifying, and formalizing practices shape everyday life, Ithaca/London, Cornell University Press, 149-167. [Google Scholar]
- Millerand F., 2018. Les figures de l’amateur naturaliste, in Heaton L., Millerand F., Dias da Silva P. (Eds), La reconfiguration du travail scientifique en biodiversité. Pratiques amateures et technologies numériques, Montréal, Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 57-67. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen J., 2006. The 90-9-1 rule for participation inequality in social media and online communities, Nielsen Norman Group, www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/. [Google Scholar]
- Sieber R., 2006. Public participation geographic information systems: a literature review and framework, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96, 3, 491‑507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sieber R.E., Haklay M., 2015. The epistemology(s) of volunteered geographic information: a critique, Geo: Geography and Environment, 2, 2, 122-136, https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.10. [Google Scholar]
- Strasser B., Baudry J., Mahr D., Sanchez G., Tancoigne E., 2019. « Citizen Science »? Rethinking science and public participation, Science and Technology Studies, 32, 2, 52-76, https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425. [Google Scholar]
- Suchman L., 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Turnhout E., Metze T., Wyborn C., Klenk N., Louder E., 2020. The politics of co-production: participation, power, and transformation, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 15-21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.