Dossier « L’évaluation des jeux sérieux sur les thématiques agro-environnementales, territoriales et alimentaires » – Introduction. Jeu sérieux : comment évaluer aujourd’hui cet outil après presque un demi-siècle de pratiques en France ?

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 32, Number 3, Juillet/Septembre 2024 Dossier « L’évaluation des jeux sérieux sur les thématiques agro-environnementales, territoriales et alimentaires »


Page(s)		253 - 259
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2025006
Published online		19 February 2025

Abt C.C., 1970. Serious Games, New York, The Viking Press. [Google Scholar]
Alvarez J., 2007. Du jeu vidéo au serious game : approches culturelle, pragmatique et formelle, Thèse de doctorat, Toulouse, Université Toulouse 2. [Google Scholar]
Alvarez J., 2021. Appréhender la dichotomie « Play » et « Game », Études de communication, 57, 205-224, https://doi.org/10.4000/edc.13264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Alvarez J., 2023. Serious game. Un carcan ludique ? Jeux vidéo, travail et instrumentalisations, Paris, Editions Loco. [Google Scholar]
Aubert A.H., Medema W., Wals A.E.J., 2019. Towards a framework for designing and assessing game-based approaches for sustainable water governance, Water, 11, 4, 869, https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040869. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bado N., 2022. Game-based learning pedagogy: a review of the literature, Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 5, 936-948, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1683587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Barreteau O., Le Page C., D’Aquino P., 2003. Role-playing games, models and negotiation processes, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6, 2, https://www.jasss.org/6/2/10.html. [Google Scholar]
Bayeck R.Y., 2020. Examining board gameplay and learning: A multidisciplinary review of recent research, Simulation & Gaming, 51, 4, 411-431, https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119901286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bellotti F., Kapralos B., Lee K., Moreno-Ger P., Berta R., 2013. Assessment in and of serious games: An overview, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 136864, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/136864. [Google Scholar]
Bogost I., 2010. Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames, Cambridge, The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
Bonenfant M., Genvo S., 2014. Une approche située et critique du concept de gamification, Sciences du jeu, 2, https://doi.org/10.4000/sdj.286. [Google Scholar]
Brougère G., 2005. Jouer/apprendre, Paris, Economica. [Google Scholar]
Brougère G., 2013. Jacques Henriot et les sciences du jeu ou la pensée de Villetaneuse, Sciences du jeu, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/sdj.202. [Google Scholar]
Bousquet F., Barreteau O., Le Page C., Mullon C., Weber J., 1999. An environmental modelling approach: the use of multi-agent simulations, Advances in environmental and ecological modelling, 113, 122. http://www.dpi.inpe.br/cursos/tutoriais/modelagem/referencias/agentes_paper.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Caillois R., 1958. Les jeux et les hommes, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
Chen S.Y., Tsai J.C., Liu S.Y., Chang C.Y., 2021. The effect of a scientific board game on improving creative problem solving skills, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100921, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100921. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Chang W.L., Yeh Y.C., 2021. A blended design of game-based learning for motivation, knowledge sharing and critical thinking enhancement, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30, 2, 271-285, https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X2021.1885482. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Commod, 2005. La modélisation comme outil d’accompagnement, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, 2, 165-168, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005023. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Daré W., 2005. Comportements des acteurs dans le jeu et dans la réalité : indépendance ou correspondance ? Analyse sociologique de l’utilisation de jeux de rôles en aide à la concertation, Thèse de doctorat, Paris, ENGREF. [Google Scholar]
Den Haan R.J., Van der Voort M.C., 2018. On evaluating social learning outcomes of serious games to collaboratively address sustainability problems: A literature review, Sustainability, 10, 12, 4529, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124529. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dernat S., 2023. Plus de 30 ans de jeux sérieux pour le développement des territoires à Clermont-Ferrand (France), Territoire en Mouvement, Revue de géographie et aménagement, Perspectives, http://journals.openedition.org/tem/11579. [Google Scholar]
Dernat S., Grillot M., Guerrier F., Martel G., Salliou N., Terrier-Gesbert M., 2022. Actes des 1^res journées GAMAE. Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03768182v1. [Google Scholar]
Dernat S., Terrier-Gesbert M., Martel G., Johany F., Revalo A., 2023a. Les jeux sérieux, des innovations au service de transitions agroenvironnementales et alimentaires durables dans les territoires. Une enquête menée en France, Technologie et Innovation, 8, https://doi.org/10.21494/ISTE.OP2023.0974. [Google Scholar]
Dernat S., Angeon V., Michelin Y., 2023b. Évaluer le jeu, in Dernat S., Michelin Y., Blache N. (Eds.), Jeux de plateau pour l’agriculture et le paysage, Versailles, Éditions Quae, 17-55. [Google Scholar]
Dernat S., Grillot M., Andreotti F., Martel G., 2023. A sustainable game changer? Systematic review of serious games used for agriculture and research agenda, Agricultural Systems, 222, 104178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104178. [Google Scholar]
Ditzler L., Klerkx L., Chan-Dentoni J., Posthumus H., Krupnik T.J., Ridaura S.L., Andersson J.A., Baudron F., Groot J.C., 2018. Affordances of agricultural systems analysis tools: A review and framework to enhance tool design and implementation, Agricultural Systems, 164, 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.03.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Djaouti D., 2014. De l’utilité de l’appellation « Serious Game ». Le jeu est-il l’apanage du divertissement ?, Interfaces numériques, 3, 3, 409-429, https://doi.org/10.3166/RIN.3.409-429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Djaouti D., Alvarez J., Jessel J.-P., Rampnoux O., 2011. Origins of serious games, in Ma M., Oikonomou A., Jain L. (Eds), Serious games and edutainment applications, Londres, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2161-9_3. [Google Scholar]
Duke R.D., 1974. Gaming, the future’s language, Beverly Hills, SAGE. [Google Scholar]
D’Aquino P., Bourgoin J., Cefaï D., Richebourg C., Hopsort S., Pascutto T., 2017. Du savoir local au pouvoir central : un processus participatif sur la réforme foncière au Sénégal, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 4, 360-369, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018001. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Engström H., Backlund P., 2021. Serious games design knowledge: Experiences from a decade (+) of serious games development, EAI Endorsed Transactions on Serious Games, 6, 1, 1-13, https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-5-2021.170008. [Google Scholar]
Etienne R., 2023. Accompagner des agriculteurs à l’aide d’une combinaison de jeux sérieux : quelles contributions aux changements de pratiques ?, Thèse de doctorat, Paris, AgroParisTech. [Google Scholar]
Feldt A.G., Dotson A., Monroe M., Sawicki D., 1972. CLUG: Community Land Use Game, New York, Free Press. [Google Scholar]
Flood S., Cradock-Henry N.A., Blackett P., Edwards P., 2018. Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making, Environmental Research Letters, 13, 6, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aac1c6. [Google Scholar]
Gris G., Bengtson C., 2021. Assessment measures in game-based learning research: A systematic review, International Journal of Serious Games, 8, 1, 3-26. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v8i1.383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hassenforder É., Girard S., Ferrand N., Petitjean C., Fermond C., 2021. La co-ingénierie de la participation : une expérience citoyenne sur la rivière Drôme, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 29, 2, 159-173, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2021050. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Hassenforder É., Dray A., Daré W., 2020. Manuel d’observation des jeux sérieux, Montpellier, CIRAD et Association Commod, https://agritrop.cirad.fr/596224/1/Manuel_ComMod_Observation_Jeux_2020_WEB.pdf. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Henriot J., 1969. Le Jeu, Paris, Presses universitaires de France. [Google Scholar]
Kirkpatrick J.D., Kirkpatrick W.K., 2016. Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation, Alexandria, ATD Press. [Google Scholar]
Klabbers J.H., 2009. The magic circle: Principles of gaming & simulation, Vol. 1, Leyde, Brill. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Klerkx L., 2021. Digital and virtual spaces as sites of extension and advisory services research: social media, gaming, and digitally integrated and augmented advice, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27, 3, 277-286, https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X2021.1934998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kriz W.C., Auchter E., 2016. 10 years of evaluation research into gaming simulation for German entrepreneurship and a new study on its long-term effects, Simulation & Gaming, 47, 2, 179-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116633972. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lardon S., Piveteau V., 2005. Méthodologie de diagnostic pour le projet de territoire : une approche par les modèles spatiaux, Géocarrefour, 80, 2, 75-90, https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Le Lay S., Savignac E., Lénel P., Frances J., 2021. La gamification de la société : Vers un régime du jeu ?, Vol. 2, Londres, ISTE Group. [Google Scholar]
Madani K., Pierce T.W., Mirchi A., 2017. Serious games on environmental management, Sustainable cities and society, 29, 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.11.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Martin G., Felten B., Magne M.-A., Piquet M., Sautier M., Theau J.P., Thénard V., Duru M., 2012. Le rami fourrager : un support pour la conception de scénarios de systèmes fourragers avec des éleveurs et des conseillers, Fourrages, 210, 119-128. [Google Scholar]
Meadows D.L., 1999. Learning to be simple: My odyssey with games, Simulation & Gaming, 30, 3, 342-351, https://doi.org/10.1177/104687819903000310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Meadows D., 2007. A brief and incomplete history of operational gaming in system dynamics, System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 23, 2-3, 199-203, https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Meadows D.H., Randers J., Meadows D.L., 1972. The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind, New York, Universe Books. [Google Scholar]
Mermet L., 1993. Une méthode de prospective : les exercices de simulation de politiques, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 1, 1, 34-46, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/19930101034. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Michael D.R., Chen S.L., 2005. Serious games: Games that educate, train, and inform, Chicago, Muska & Lipman/Premier-Trade. [Google Scholar]
Mochizuki J., Magnuszewski P., Pajak M., Krolikowska K., Jarzabek L., Kulakowska M., 2021. Simulation games as a catalyst for social learning: The case of the water-food-energy nexus game, Global Environmental Change, 66, 102204, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Piveteau V., 1995. Prospective et territoire : apport d’une réflexion sur le jeu, in Études Gestion des territoires, 15, Antony, Cemagref Éditions. [Google Scholar]
Rittel H.W., Webber M.M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning, Policy sciences, 4, 2, 155-169, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730. [Google Scholar]
Rogerson M.J., Gibbs M., 2018. Finding time for tabletop: Board game play and parenting, Games and Culture, 13, 3, 280-300, https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016656324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Sieza Y., Gomgnimbou A.P., Serme I., 2023. Bibliometric analysis of the use of the companion modeling approach in inter-and multidisciplinary research, Journal of Environmental Science, Computer Science and Engineering & Technology, 13, 3, 248-257, https://www.jecet.org/download_frontend.php?id=665&table=Env%20Science. [Google Scholar]
Sousa M., 2021. Serious board games: modding existing games for collaborative ideation processes, International Journal of Serious Games, 8, 2, 129-146, https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v8i2.405. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Stanitsas M., Kirytopoulos K., Vareilles É., 2019. Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review, Journal of cleaner production, 208, 924-936, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Vervoort J.M., Milkoreit M., van Beek L., Mangnus A.C., Farrell D., McGreevy S.R., Huber M., 2022. Not just playing: the politics of designing games for impact on anticipatory climate governance, Geoforum, 137, 213-221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.03.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Zheng L.R., Oberle C.M., Hawkes-Robinson W.A., Daniau S., 2021. Serious games as a complementary tool for social skill development in young people: a systematic review of the literature, Simulation & Gaming, 52, 6, 686-714, https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781211031283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.