Participatory-action research leading to transformation of scientific disciplines’ interrelations, research paths, actors’ reasoning, and viticultural practices

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 32, Number 2, Avril/Juin 2024


Page(s)		142 - 154
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2024042
Published online		05 November 2024

Adrakey H.K., Malembic-Maher S., Rusch A., Ay J.-S., Riley L.,Ramalanjaona L., Fabre F., 2022. Field and landscape risk factors impacting flavescence dorée infection: insights from spatial Bayesian modeling in the Bordeaux vineyards, Phytopathology, 112, 8, 1686-1697, https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-21-0449-R. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Adrakey H.K., Gibson G.J., Eveillard S., Malembic-Maher S., Fabre F., 2023. Bayesian inference for spatio-temporal stochastic transmission of plant disease in the presence of roguing: a case study to characterise the dispersal of Flavescence dorée, PLoS Computional Biology, 19, 9, e1011399, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Agre P., Leshner I., 2010. Bridging science and society, Science, 327, 5968, 921, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188231. [Google Scholar]
Akrich M., Callon M., Latour B., 2006. Sociologie de la traduction. Textes fondateurs, Paris, Presses des mines. [Google Scholar]
Ancori B., 2005. Analogie, évolution scientifique et réseaux complexes, Nouvelles perspectives en sciences sociales, 1, 1, 9-61, https://doi.org/10.7202/602445ar. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ancori B., 2012. La production et la circulation des connaissances scientifiques et des savoirs profanes dans nos sociétés techniciennes, in Darbellay F. (Ed.), La circulation des savoirs. Interdisciplinarité, concepts nomades, analogies, métaphores, Berne, Peter Lang, 203–240. [Google Scholar]
Bachelard G., 2011. La formation de l’esprit scientifique, Paris, Librairie philosophique J. Vrin. [Google Scholar]
Barbier R., 1996. La recherche action, Paris, Anthropos. [Google Scholar]
Bergmann B., Schäpke N., Marg O., Stelzer F., Lang D.J., Bossert M., Gantert M., Häußler E., Marquardt E., Piontek F. M. et al., 2021. Transdisciplinary sustainability research in real-world labs: success factors and methods for change, Nature Sustainability, 16, 541–564. [Google Scholar]
Bertsch C., Larignon P., Farine S., Clément C., Fontaine F., 2009. The spread of grapevine trunk disease, Science, 324, 5928, 721, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.324_721a. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Billaud J.-P., 2003. De l’objet de l’interdisciplinarité à l’interdisciplinarité autour des objets, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 11, 1, 29-36, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1240-1307(03)00005-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Billaud J.-P., Hubert B., Vivien F.D., 2017. Les recherches participatives : plus de science ou une autre science?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 25, 4, 325-326, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018015. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Billaud J.-P., Hubert B., 2020. Y aura-t-il un « monde d’après » pour la recherche ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 28, 1, 1-2, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2020024. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Boudon-Padieu E., 2002. Flavescence dorée of the grapevine: knowledge and new developments in epidemiology, etiology and diagnosis, in Canova A. (Ed.), ATTI Giornate Fitopatologiche, 2-11aprile, Trento, Baselga di Piné, 15–34. [Google Scholar]
Brevers D., Baeken C., Maurage P., Sescousse G., Vögele C., Billieux J., 2021. Brain mechanisms underlying prospective thinking of sustainable behaviours, Nature Sustainability, 4, 433-439, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00658-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Bromham L., Dinnage R., Hua X., 2016. Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success, Nature, 534, 684-687, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Calame M., 2015. Agronomie : des sciences du vivant à l’ingéniorat participatif, Techniques de l’ingénieur, https://doi.org/10.51257/a-v1-ag720. [Google Scholar]
Capriotti L., Baraldi E., Mezzetti B., Limera C., Sabbadini S., 2020. Biotechnological approaches: gene overexpression, gene silencing, and genome editing to control fungal and oomycete diseases in grapevine, International Journal of Molecular Science, 21, 16, 5701, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165701. [Google Scholar]
Caudwell A., 1957. Deux années d’études sur la flavescence dorée, nouvelle maladie grave de la vigne, Annales de l’amélioration des plantes, 12, 359–393. [Google Scholar]
Cerf M., Le Bail M., Lusson J.-M., Omon B., 2017. Contrasting intermediation practices in various advisory service networks in the case of the French Ecophyto plan, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 23, 3, 231-234, https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1320641. [Google Scholar]
Chuche J., Thiéry D., 2014. Biology and ecology of the Flavescence dorée vector Scaphoideus titanus: a review, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34, 381-403, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0208-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Darbellay F., 2015. Rethinking inter- and transdisciplinarity: undisciplined knowledge and the emergence of a new thought style, Futures, 65, 163-174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.009. [Google Scholar]
Editorial, 2018. Interdisciplinary peer review, 2018, Nature Sustainability, 1, 323, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0111-3. [Google Scholar]
Feechan A., Anderson C., Torregrosa L., Jermakow A., Mestre P., Wiedemann-Merdinoglu S., Merdinoglu D., Walker A.R., Cadle-Davidson L., Reisch B. et al., 2013. Genetic dissection of a TIR-NB-LRR locus from the wild North American grapevine species Muscadinia rotundifolia identifies paralogous genes conferring resistance to major fungal and oomycete pathogens in cultivated grapevine, The plant journal, 76, 4, 661-674, https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/tpj.12327. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Feyerabend P., 1979 [1^re éd. 1975]. Contre la méthode. Esquisse d’une théorie anarchiste de la connaissance, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Foster J.G., Rzhetsky A., Evans J.A., 2015. Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies, American Sociological Review, 80, 5, 875-908. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Graur D., 2007. Public control could be a nightmare for researchers, Nature, 450, 1156, 20, https://doi.org/10.1038/4501156b. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Guichard L., Dedieu F., Jeuffroy M.-H., Meynard J.-M., Reau R., Savini I., 2017. Le plan Ecophyto de réduction d’usage des pesticides en France : décryptage d’un échec et raisons d’espérer, Cahiers Agriculture, 26, 1, https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2017004. [Google Scholar]
Haklay M., 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation, In Sui D., Elwood S., Goodchild M. (Eds), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer, 105-122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Henaux M., Masson J.E., 2021. Co-conception de pratiques viticoles agroécologiques par la recherche-action participative : impacts de la méthode REPERE construite par le GIEE de Westhalten. Rapport de recherche, INRAE, www.inrae.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/VitiRepere-ASIRPA-pratiques-viticoles-18p-FR.pdf. [Google Scholar]
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2023. Climate Change 2023. Synthesis Report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Lee H., Romero J. (Eds)], Geneva, IPCC. www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/ [Google Scholar]
Irwin E.G., Culligan P.J., Fischer-Kowalski M., Lavender Law K., Murtugudde R., Pfirman S., 2018. Bridging barriers to advance global sustainability, Nature Sustainability, 1, 324-326, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0085-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Jollivet M., Legay J.-M., 2005. Canevas pour une réflexion sur une interdisciplinarité entre sciences de la nature et sciences sociales, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 13, 2, 184-188, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2005030. [Google Scholar]
Kwame A.H., Malembic-Maher S., Rusch A., Ay J.S., Riley L., Ramalanjaona L., Fabre F., 2022. Field and landscape risk factors impacting Flavescence dorée infection: Insights from spatial Bayesian modelling in the Bordeaux vineyards, Phytopathology, 112, 8, 1686-1697, https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-10-21-0449-R. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Latour B., 2009 [1st ed. 2004]. Politics of nature. How to bring the sciences into democracy, Cambridge, Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]
Latour B., 2018. Esquisse d’un Parlement des choses, Écologie & politique, 1, 56, 47-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Madouas M., Henaux M., Delrieu V., Jaugey C., Teillet E., Perrin M., Schmitt C., Oberheiden M., Schermesser F., Soustre-Gacougnolle I., Masson J.E., 2023. Learning, reflexivity, decision-making, and behavioral change for sustainable viticulture associated with participatory action research, Humanities and Social Sciences Commununications, 10, 212, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01690-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Malembic-Maher S., Desqué D., Khalil D., Salar P., Bergey B., Danet J.L., Duret S., Dubrana-Ourabah M.P., Beven L., Ember I. et al., 2020. When a Palearctic bacterium meets a Nearctic insect vector: genetic and ecological insights into the emergence of the grapevine Flavescence dorée epidemics in Europe, PLoS Pathogens, 16, 3. [Google Scholar]
Malembic-Maher S., Foissac X., Panziera F., Barbier M., 2023. La prophylaxie pour gérer les crises sanitaires lorsqu’elles s’installent : vivre avec la Flavescence dorée de la vigne, in Lannou C., Rasplus J.-Y., Soubeyrand S., Gautier M., Jean-Pierre Rossi J.-P. (Eds), Crises sanitaires en agriculture. Les espèces invasives sous surveillance, Versailles, Quæ, 283-296. [Google Scholar]
Mapfumo P., Adjei-Nsiah S., Mtambanengwe F., Chikowo R., Giller K.E., 2013. Participatory action research (PAR) as an entry point for supporting climate change adaptation by smallholder farmers in Africa, Environmental Development, 5, 6-22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Marks J., 2019. Dossier : Le groupe des Dix, des précurseurs de l’interdisciplinarité − Biology and complexity: Edgar Morin and Henri Atlan, Nature Sciences Sociétés, 27, 2, 159-168, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2019031. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Masson J.E., Soustre-Gacougnolle I., Perrin M., Schmitt C., Henaux M., Jaugey C., Teillet E., Lollier M., Lallemand J.-F., Schermesser F. et al., 2021. Transdisciplinary participatory-action-research from questions to actionable knowledge for sustainable viticulture development, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8, 24, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00693-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., 1992. Beyond the limits. Confronting global collapse, envisioning a sustainable future, Post Mills, Chelsea Green Publishing. [Google Scholar]
Moneyron A., L.M.C., Westhalten group, Lallemand J.-F., Schmitt C., Perrin M., Soustre-Gacougnolle I., Masson J.E., 2017. Linking the knowledge and reasoning of dissenting actors fosters a bottom-up design of agroecological viticulture, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 37, 41, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0449-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Morin E., 2000. Les sept savoirs nécessaires à l’éducation du futur, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Morin E., 2014. La méthode 3. La connaissance de la connaissance, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Morin E., 2017. Introduction à la pensée complexe, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
Morin E., 2020. Cette crise nous pousse à nous interroger sur notre mode de vie, sur nos vrais besoins masqués dans les aliénations du quotidien, Le Monde, 19 avril, www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2020/04/19/edgar-morin-la-crise-due-au-coronavirus-devrait-ouvrir-nos-esprits-depuis-longtemps-confines-sur-l-immediat_6037066_3232.html. [Google Scholar]
Moulin J., 2013. Le Paradigme perdu : Edgar Morin et l’écologie de l’action. Communication au colloque Nature(s) : concevoir, vivre, représenter (18^e-21^e siècles), 6-8 juin, Nantes, https://hal.science/hal-01131237/document. [Google Scholar]
Nicolescu B., 2010. Methodology of transdisciplinarity-levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity, Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1, 1, https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Oliveira M.J.R.A., Roriz M., Vasconcelos M.W., Bertaccini A., Carvalho S.M.P., 2019. Conventional and novel approaches for managing “flavescence dorée” in grapevine: knowledge gaps and future prospects, Plant Pathology, 68, 1, 3-17, https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12938. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Paillotin G., Callon M., Lascoumes P., 2002. Recherche confinée et recherche de plein air, Les amis de l’École de Paris. [Google Scholar]
Park M., Leahey E., Funk R.J., 2023. Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time, Nature, 613, 138-144, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Pedersen D.B., 2016. Integrating social sciences and humanities in interdisciplinary research, Palgrave Communications, 2, 16036,https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Popa F., Guillermin M., Dedeurwaerdere T., 2015. A pragmatist approach to transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: from complex systems theory to reflexive science, Futures, 65, 45-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.02.002. [Google Scholar]
Popper K.R., 1963. Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge, New York, Harper & Row. Trad fr. : Conjectures et réfutations. La croissance du savoir scientifique, Paris, Payot, 1985. [Google Scholar]
Resnik D., Elliott K., Miller-Rushing A., 2015. A framework for addressing ethical issues in citizen science, Environmental Science and Policy, 54, 47581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rigolot C., 2018. Un éclairage complémentaire de la littérature anglophone sur la transdisciplinarité « forte », plutôt que « de mode 1 », Natures Sciences Sociétés, 26, 1, 84-86, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018024. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Sanchez W., Mamy L., Pesce S., Leenhardt S., 2023. Pluridisciplinarité et interdisciplinarité au cœur de l’expertise scientifique collective INRAE et Ifremer sur les effets des produits phytopharmaceutiques sur la biodiversité et les services écosystémiques, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 31, 2, 199-206, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2023038. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Schäpke N., Stelzer F., Caniglia G., Bergmann M., Wanner M., Singer-Brodowski M., Loorbach D., Olsson P., Baedeker C., Lang D., 2018. Jointly experimenting for transformation? Shaping real-world laboratories by comparing them, GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27, Supp. 1, 86-96, https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16. [Google Scholar]
Soustre-Gacougnolle I., Lollier M., Schmitt C., Perrin M., Buvens E., Lallemand J.-F., Mermet M., Thibault-Carpentier C., Dembelé D., Steyer D. et al., 2018. Responses to climatic and pathogen threats differ in biodynamic and conventional vines, Nature Scientific Reports, 8, 16857, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35305-7. [Google Scholar]
Stengers I., 2013. Une autre science est possible! Manifeste pour un ralentissement des sciences, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Strasser B.J., Baudry J., Mahr D., Sanchez G., Tancoigne E., 2019. “Citizen science”? rethinking science and public participation, Science & Technology Studies, 32, 2, 52-76. [Google Scholar]
Vinck D., 1999. Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique. Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales, Revue française de sociologie, 40, 2, 385-414, www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1999_num_40_2_5173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Wagner C.S., Roessner J.D., Bobb K., Klein J.T., Boyack K.W., Keyton J., Börner K., 2011. Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): a review of the literature, Journal of Informetrics, 5, 1, 14-26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Williard E., 2018. The best research is produced when researchers and communities work together. Editorial, Nature, 562, 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06855-7. [Google Scholar]
Zaccaï E., 2007. Développement durable et disciplines scientifiques, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 15, 4, 379-388, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss:2008004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.