Protéger l’environnement pour se gouverner ? Repolitiser les « subjectivités environnementales » dans les aires protégées (San Andrés, Colombie)

Open Access

Issue		Nat. Sci. Soc. Volume 31, Number 1, Janvier/Mars 2023


Page(s)		35 - 48
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2023021
Published online		26 June 2023

Abello A., Mow J.M., 2008. San Andrés, nuestra ciudad insular, Credencial Historia, 228. [Google Scholar]
Agrawal A., 2002. Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification, International Social Science Journal, 54, 173, 287-297, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00382. [Google Scholar]
Agrawal A., 2005a. Environmentality: community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India, Current Anthropology, 46, 2, 161-190, https://doi.org/10.1086/427122. [Google Scholar]
Agrawal A., 2005b. Environmentality: technologies of government and the making of subjects, Durham, Duke University Press (New ecologies for the twenty-first century). [Google Scholar]
Balandier G., 2013. Tradition et modernité, in Balandier G., Anthropologie politique, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 193-226. [Google Scholar]
Benjaminsen T.A., Svarstad H., 2009. Qu’est-ce que la « political ecology » ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 17, 1, 3-11, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2009002. [Google Scholar]
Beretti L., 2012. La question de la participation des acteurs locaux dans le processus de mise en place du parc naturel marin de Mayotte (France). Thèse de doctorat en géographie, La Rochelle, Rochelle Université. [Google Scholar]
Berthod J., 2021. Pêcheurs artisanaux en AMP : gardiens de la biodiversité ou des frontières maritimes ? (San Andrés, Colombie), VertigO, 21, 1, https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.30463. [Google Scholar]
Blanc G., 2020. L’invention du colonialisme vert. Pour en finir avec le mythe de l’Éden africain, Paris, Flammarion. [Google Scholar]
Blaser M., 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: toward a conversation on political ontology, Current Anthropology, 54, 5, 547-568, https://doi.org/10.1086/672270. [Google Scholar]
Blitstein P., Lemieux C., 2018. Comment rouvrir la question de la modernité ? Quelques propositions, Politix, 123, 3, 7-33, https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.123.0007. [Google Scholar]
Bookbinder M.P., Dinerstein E., Rijal A., Cauley H., Rajouria A., 1998. Ecotourism’s support of biodiversity conservation, Conservation Biology, 12, 6, 1399-1404, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.97229.x. [Google Scholar]
Campbell L.M. 2002. Conservation narratives in Costa Rica: conflict and co-existence, Development and Change, 33, 1, 29-56, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00239. [Google Scholar]
Campbell L.M., 2007. Local conservation practice and global discourse: a political ecology of sea turtle conservation, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 97, 2, 313-334, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2007.00538.x. [Google Scholar]
Campbell L.M., Vainio-Mattila A., 2003. Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned?, Human Ecology, 31, 3, 417-437. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025071822388. [Google Scholar]
Cánovas-Molina A., García-Frapolli E., 2020. Untangling worldwide conflicts in marine protected areas: five lessons from the five continents, Marine Policy, 121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104185. [Google Scholar]
CCO (Comisión Colombiana del Océano), 2015. Aportes al conocimiento de la Reserva de Biosfera Seaflower, Comision Colombiana del Océano, p. 108. (online: http://www.cco.gov.co/docs/publicaciones/seaflower.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Charles L., Kalaora B., 2008. Pensée, sensibilité et action dans la société française autour de la question de la nature, Annales de géographie, 663, 5, 3-25, https://doi.org/10.3917/ag.663.0003. [Google Scholar]
Chasqui Velasco L., Polanco Fernández A., Acero Pizarro A., 2017. Libro rojo de peces marinos de Colombia (2017), Santa Marta, Colombia, INVEMAR. [Google Scholar]
Chateauraynaud F., 2011. Sociologie argumentative et dynamique des controverses : l’exemple de l’argument climatique dans la relance de l’énergie nucléaire en Europe, A contrario, 16, 2, 131-150, https://doi.org/10.3917/aco.112.0131. [Google Scholar]
Chlous-Ducharme F., 2005. Les savoirs – outils de distinction et de légitimation dans le cadre d’une gestion durable : le cas des pêcheurs à pied d’ormeaux, VertigO, 6, https://doi.org/10.4000/vertigo.2730. [Google Scholar]
Comby, J.-B., 2015. À propos de la dépossession écologique des classes populaires, Savoir/Agir, 33, 3, 23-30, https://doi.org/10.3917/sava.033.0023. [Google Scholar]
Compagnon D., Rodary E., 2017. Les politiques de biodiversité, Paris, Presses de Sciences Po. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
CORALINA-INVEMAR, 2012. Gómez- López D.I., Segura-Quintero C. Sierra-Correa P.C., Garay-Tinoco J. (Eds). Atlas de la reserva de biósfera Seaflower. Archipiélago de San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina. Instituto de investigaciones marinas y costeras ‘José Benito Vives De Andréis’ – INVEMAR – y Corporación para el desarrollo sostenible del archipiélago de San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina, INVEMAR, 28, http://www.invemar.org.co/redcostera1/invemar/docs/10447AtlasSAISeaflower.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Cortes-Vazquez J.A., Ruiz-Ballesteros E., 2018. Practising nature: a phenomenological rethinking of environmentality in natural protected areas in Ecuador and Spain, Conservation and Society, 16, 3, 232-242, https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_158. [Google Scholar]
Dahou T., 2010. Gérer l’espace sans gouverner les hommes : le dilemme des aires marines protégées (Saloum, Sénégal), Anthropologie et Sociétés, 34, 1, 75, https://doi.org/10.7202/044197ar. [Google Scholar]
Dahou T., 2013. Droits d’accès ou droits de contourner ?, Études Rurales, 193, 25-42, https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesrurales.9881. [Google Scholar]
Darier E., 1996. Environmental governmentality: the case of Canada’s green plan, Environmental Politics, 5, 4, 585-606, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019608414294. [Google Scholar]
Das V., Poole D. (Eds), 2004. Anthropology in the margins of the state, Delhi, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Dubost I., 2001. Négociation des identités pour les pêcheurs martiniquais, in Bonniol J.-L., Paradoxes du métissage, Paris, CTHS, 159-168. [Google Scholar]
Dumoulin D., 2005a. Les politiques de conservation de la nature en Amérique latine : au cœur de l’internationalisation et de la convergence des ordres politiques, Revista de la CEPAL, Numéro Special, 71-85. [Google Scholar]
Dumoulin D., 2005b. ¿Quién construye la aureola verde del indio global?: el papel de los distintos actores transnacionales y la desconexión mexicana, Foro Internacional, 45, 1, 35-64, https://forointernacional.colmex.mx/index.php/fi/article/view/1763. [Google Scholar]
Escobar A., 1989. The professionalization and institutionalization of ‘development’ in Colombia in the early post-World War II period, International Journal of Educational Development, 9, 2, 139-154, https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-0593(89)90033-3. [Google Scholar]
Ferguson J., 1990. The Anti-Politics machine. “Development”, depolitization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho, Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
Fletcher R., 2010. Neoliberal environmentality: towards a poststructuralist political ecology of the conservation debate, Conservation and Society, 8, 3, 171-181, https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.73806. [Google Scholar]
Foucault M., 1994. Dits et écrits 1954-1988. Tome IV 1980-1988, Edited by D. Defert and F. Ewald, Paris, Gallimard. [Google Scholar]
Foyer J., Ellison N., 2018. Conserver les maïs mexicains. La diversité bio-culturelle et ses ambiguïtés, Études rurales, 202, 2, 120-139, https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesrurales.15306. [Google Scholar]
Friedlander A., Nowlis J.S., Sanchez J.A., Appeldoorn R., Usseglio P., McCormick C., Bejarano S., Mitchell-Chui A., 2003. Designing effective marine protected areas in seaflower biosphere reserve, Colombia, based on biological and sociological information, Conservation Biology, 17, 6, 1769-1784, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00338.x. [Google Scholar]
Goldman M., 2001. Constructing an environmental state: eco-governmentality and other transnational practices of a ‘green’ world bank, Social Problems, 48, 4, 499-523, https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2001.48.4.499. [Google Scholar]
Goldman M.J., Nadasdy P., Turner M.D. (Eds), 2011. Knowing nature: conversations at the intersection of political ecology and science studies, Chicago/London, University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Haraway D., 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective, Feminist Studies, 14, 3, 575-599, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066. [Google Scholar]
Howard M.W., 2006. Evaluation report seaflower biosphere reserve implementation: the first five years 2000-2005, San Andrés Archipiélago, UNESCO, MAB Programme, www.supras.biz/pdf/howard_mw_2006_seaflowerevaluation.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Howard M.W., Connolly E., Taylor E., Mow J.M., 2003. Community-based development of multiple-use marine protected areas: promoting stewardship and sharing responsibility for conservation in the San Andres Archipelago, Colombia, Gulf and Caribbean Research, 14, https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.1402.12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Hrabanski M., 2014. Instrument de marché et biodiversité, CERISCOPE Environnement, http://ceriscope.sciences-po.fr/environnement/content/part4/instrument-de-marche-et-biodiversite?page=2. [Google Scholar]
Lafaye C., Thévenot L., 1993. Une justification écologique ? Conflits dans l’aménagement de la nature, Revue Française de Sociologie, 34, 4, 495-524, www.persee.fr/doc/rfsoc_0035-2969_1993_num_34_4_4283. [Google Scholar]
Lamy J., 2014. Foucault à tort et à travers 2/2, ZILSEL, https://zilsel.hypotheses.org/683. [Google Scholar]
Larrère C., Larrère R., 1997. Du bon usage de la nature. Pour une philosophie de l’environnement, Paris, Aubier. [Google Scholar]
Lascoumes P., 1994. L’éco-pouvoir, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
Lautier B., 2006. Notes d’un sociologue sur l’usage de la notion de ‘marge’ dans les sciences sociales du développement, Tiers-Monde, 47, 185, 17-20, https://doi.org/10.3406/tiers.2006.5911. [Google Scholar]
Lelong S., 2010. La mise en place d’aires marines protégées et leurs incidences conflictuelles dans le monde de la pêche. L’exemple du Parc Naturel Marin d’Iroise (France), Cahiers de géographie, 10, 1, 149-162, https://doi.org/10.3406/edyte.2010.1123. [Google Scholar]
Luke T., 1995. On Environmentality: geo-power and eco-knowledge in the discourses of contemporary environmentalism, Cultural Critique, 31, 2, 57-81. [Google Scholar]
Marcus G.E., 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography, Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 1, 95-117, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.000523. [Google Scholar]
Marquez Pérez A.I., 2014. Catboats, lanchs and canoes: apuntes para una historia de las relaciones de las islas de Providencia y Santa Catalina con el Caribe centroaméricano e insular a través de la construcción y el uso de embarcaciones de madera, Passagens, 6, 3, 480-508, https://doi.org/10.5533/1984-2503-20146303. [Google Scholar]
Mow J.M., 2005. La reserva de biosfera seaflower: una opción viable para las islas de San Andrés, Old Providence y Santa Catalina, Anaconda, 6, 22-30, www.fundacionbat.com.co/file/biblioteca/8111_Reservadebisfera.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Mow J.M., Howard M., Taylor E., Chiquillo M., 2007. Collaborative planning and management of the San Andres Archipelago’s coastal and marine resources: a short communication on the evolution of the Seaflower marine protected area, Ocean & Coastal Management, 50, 3, 209-222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.09.001. [Google Scholar]
Müller B., 2012. Comment rendre le monde gouvernable sans le gouverner : les organisations internationales analysées par les anthropologues, Critique internationale, 54, 1, 9-18, https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.054.0009. [Google Scholar]
Ostrom E., 1999. Coping with tragedies of the commons, Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 493-535, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493. [Google Scholar]
Pulido Gómez G., Costa Ribeiro W., 2017. Geopolítica y petróleo en el Mar Caribe: la tensión entre Colombia y Nicaragua, Revista Geográfica De América Central, 60, 87-115, https://doi.org/10.15359/rgac.60-1.3. [Google Scholar]
Raison du Cleuziou Y., 2012. Le braconnage des animaux protégés, un acte politique ? Réflexions sur un effet pervers des politiques publiques environnementales, in Le Gall L., Offerlé M., Ploux F., La Politique sans en avoir l’air, Presses universitaires de Rennes, 279-293. [Google Scholar]
Robbins P., 2011. Political ecology: a critical introduction, Malden, Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
Rutherford S., 2017. Environmentality and green governmentality, in Richardson D., Castree N., Goodchild M., Kobayashi A., Liu W., Marston R., The International Encyclopedia of Geography, New Jersey, Wiley, 1-4, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0111. [Google Scholar]
Scott J.C., 1990. Domination and the arts of resistance: hidden transcripts, New Haven, Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
Thévenot L., 2006. La personne dans ses engagements pluriels, in Thévenot L., L’action au pluriel. Sociologie des régimes d’engagement, Paris, La Découverte, 227-259. [Google Scholar]
Trouillot M.-R., 2003. Anthropology and the savage slot. The poetics and politics of otherness, in Trouillot M.-R., Global transformations. Anthropology and the modern world, New York, Palgrave MacMillan, 6-28. [Google Scholar]
Ulloa A., 2005. The ecological native indigenous peoples’ movements and eco-governmentality in Colombia, New York/London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Ward L., 2013. Eco-governmentality revisited: mapping divergent subjectivities among integrated water resource management experts in Paraguay, Geoforum, 46, 91-102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.004. [Google Scholar]
West P., Igoe J., Brockington D., 2006. Parks and peoples: the social impact of protected areas, Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 1, 251-277, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.