Open Access
Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 30, Number 3-4, Juillet/Décembre 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 265 - 277 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2023007 | |
Published online | 17 March 2023 |
- [n.s.], 2020. Une centaine d’universitaires alertent : « Sur l’islamisme, ce qui nous menace, c’est la persistance du déni », 31 octobre, https://www.lemonde.fr/idees/article/2020/10/31/une-centaine-d-universitaires-alertent-sur-l-islamisme-ce-qui-nous-menace-c-est-la-persistance-du-deni_6057989_3232.html. [Google Scholar]
- Alimonda H., 2002. Ecología política: naturaleza, sociedad y utopía, Buenos Aires, CLACSO. [Google Scholar]
- Alimonda H., 2011. La colonialidad de la naturaleza. Una aproximación a la ecología política latinoamericana, in Alimonda H. (Ed.), La naturaleza colonizada. Ecología política y minería en América Latina, Buenos Aires, CLACSO, 21-58. [Google Scholar]
- Alimonda H., Toro Pérez C., Martín F. (Eds), 2017. Ecología política latinoamericana (Tomo I y II): pensamiento crítico, diferencia latinoamericana y rearticulación epistémica, Buenos Aires, CLACSO. [Google Scholar]
- Bailey S., Bryant R.L., 1997. Third world political ecology: an introduction, London, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Benjaminsen T.A., Svarstad H., 2009. Qu’est-ce que la ‘political ecology’ ?, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 17, 1, 3-11, https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2009002. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Blaikie P., 1985. The Political economy of soil erosion in developing countries, London, Longman. [Google Scholar]
- Blaser M., 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: toward a conversation on political ontology, Current Anthropology, 54, 5, 547-568, https://doi.org/10.1086/672270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bryant R.L., 2015. The international handbook of political ecology, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936172. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cabnal L., 2010. Feminismos diversos: el feminismo comunitario, Madrid, ACSUR-Las Segovias. [Google Scholar]
- Chateauraynaud F., 2015. L’emprise comme expérience. Enquêtes pragmatiques et théories du pouvoir, SociologieS, https://doi.org/10.4000/sociologies.4931. [Google Scholar]
- Cruz Hernández D.T., 2016. Una mirada muy otra a los territorios-cuerpos femeninos, Solar: Revista de filosofía Iberoamericana, 12, 1, 35-46, www.biblioteca.bepe.org.ar/items/show/332. [Google Scholar]
- Cumes A., 2017. La cosmovision maya et le patriarcat : une interprétation critique, Recherches féministes, 30, 1, 47-59, https://doi.org/10.7202/1040974ar. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Deleuze G., Guattari F., 1980. Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2. Mille plateaux, Paris, Éditions de Minuit. [Google Scholar]
- De Luca Zuria A., Fosado Centeno E., Velázquez Gutiérrez M. (Eds), 2020. Feminismo socioambiental: revitalizando el debate desde América latina, Cuernavaca, Universidad nacional autónoma de México. [Google Scholar]
- Dianteill E., 2015. Ontologie et anthropologie. Dix ans de controverse (Brésil, France, États-Unis), Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 53-2, 119-144. https://doi.org/10.4000/ress.3314. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Durand L., 2019. Power, identity and biodiversity conservation in the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, Chiapas, Mexico, Journal of Political Ecology, 26, 1, 19-37, https://doi.org/10.2458/v26i1.23160. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Durand Smith L., Figueroa Diaz F., Chávez G., 2011. La ecología política en México ¿Dónde estamos y para dónde vamos?, Estudios sociales, 19, 37, 281-307. [Google Scholar]
- Dussel E., 2009. Pour un dialogue mondial entre traditions philosophiques, Cahiers des Amériques latines, 62, 111-127. https://doi.org/10.4000/cal.1619. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Echeverri J.A., 2004. Territorio como cuerpo y territorio como naturaleza: ¿diálogo intercultural?, in Surrallés A., García Hierro P. (Eds), Tierra adentro: territorio indígena y percepción del entorno, Copenhague, IWGIA, 259-276. [Google Scholar]
- Ehrlich P., 1968. The population bomb, New York, Sierra Club/Ballantine Books. [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 1994. Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the third world, Princeton (N.J), Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 2003. Mundos y conocimientos de otro modo. El programa de investigación de modernidad/colonialidad latinoamericano, Tabula Rasa, 1, 51-86, www.redalyc.org/pdf/396/39600104.pdf. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 2011. Sustainability: design for the pluriverse, Development, 54, 2, 137-140. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 2014. Sentipensar con la tierra: nuevas lecturas sobre desarrollo, territorio y diferencia, Medellín, Ediciones Unaula. [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 2015a. Territorios de diferencia: la ontología política de los ‘derechos al territorio’, Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 35, https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v35i0.43540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 2015b. Transiciones: a space for research and design for transitions to the pluriverse, Design Philosophy Papers, 13, 1, 13-23, https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085690. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Escobar A., 2018. Sentir-penser avec la Terre : l’écologie au-delà de l’Occident, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Fals Borda O., Moncayo V.M., 2009. Una sociología sentipensante para América latina, Bogotá, Siglo del hombre. [Google Scholar]
- Freire P., 1969. Extensión o comunicación? Sobre los profesionales y el conocimiento en el (no) diálogo de saberes, Santiago de Chile, Instituto de Capacitación e Investigación en Reforma Agraria. [Google Scholar]
- Giraldo O.F., 2019. Political ecology of agriculture: agroecology and post-development, Cham, Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11824-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Giraldo O.F., Toro I., 2020. Afectividad ambiental: sensibilidad, empatía, estéticas del habitar, Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexique, ECOSUR/Universidad Veracruzana. [Google Scholar]
- Gorz A., 1975. Écologie et politique, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
- Gudynas E., 2011. Buen vivir: today’s tomorrow, Development, 54, 4, 441-447. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Haesbaert R., 2003. Da desterritorialização à multiterritorialidade, Boletim Gaúcho de Geografia, 29, 1, 11-24, https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/bgg/article/view/38739/26249. [Google Scholar]
- Haesbaert R., 2020. Del cuerpo-territorio al territorio-cuerpo (De la tierra): contribuciones Decoloniales, Cultura y representaciones sociales, 15, 29, 267-301, www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-81102020000200267. [Google Scholar]
- Hardin G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons: the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality, Science, 162, 3859, 1243-1248, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1724745. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey D., 2004. Le « Nouvel Impérialisme » : accumulation par expropriation, Actuel Marx, Presses universitaires de France, 35, 1, 71-90, https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.035.0071. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hecht S.B., 1985. Environment, development and politics: capital accumulation and the livestock sector in Eastern Amazonia, World development, 13, 6, 663-684, https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(85)90114-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hurtado López F., 2017. Universalisme ou pluriversalisme ? Les apports de la philosophie latino-américaine, Tumultes, 48, 1, 39-50, https://doi.org/10.3917/tumu.048.0039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kohn E., 2015. Anthropology of ontologies, Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 311-327, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 1995. Green production: Toward an environmental rationality, New York, Guilford Press New York. [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 1998. Saber ambiental: Sustentabilidad, racionalidad, conplejidad, poder, Mexico, Siglo XXI. [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 2003. La ecología política en América latina: un campo en construcción, Polis, 5, 1-2, 17-40, http://journals.openedition.org/polis/6871. [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 2004a. Racionalidad ambiental: la reapropiación social de la naturaleza, México, Siglo XXI. [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 2004b. Racionalidad ambiental y diálogo de saberes : significancia y sentido en la construcción de un futuro sustentable, Polis, 2, 7, www.redalyc.org/pdf/305/30500705.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 2005. Savoir environnemental : épistémologie, rationalité et dialogue des savoirs. Enjeux et défis pour l’éducation, in Sauvé L., Orellana I., van Steenberghe É. (Eds), Éducation et environnement : un croisement des savoirs, Montréal, Fides, 49-65. [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 2015. Political Ecology: a Latin American perspective, Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 35, https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v35i0.44381. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Leff E., 2017. Las relaciones de poder del conocimiento en el campo de la ecología política, Ambiente & Sociedade, 20, 3, 229-262, https://biblat.unam.mx/hevila/Ambiente&sociedade/2017/vol20/no3/12.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Little P.E., 2006. Ecologia política como etnografia: um guia teórico e metodológico, Horizontes Antropológicos, 25, 85-103, www.scielo.br/j/ha/a/kskpPgWtcXBssgNB56pn3rC/?lang=pt&format=pdf. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Loftus A., 2019. Political ecology I: where is political ecology?, Progress in Human Geography, 43, 1, 172-182, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132517734338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Machado Aráoz H., 2013. Crisis ecológica, conflictos socioambientales y orden neocolonial: las paradojas de NuestrAmérica en las fronteras del extractivismo, Rebela, 3, 2. [Google Scholar]
- Makaran G., Gaussens P. (Eds), 2020. Piel blanca, máscaras negras. Crítica de la razón decolonial, México, Bajo Tierra. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez Alier J., 1995. Political ecology, distributional conflicts, and economic incommensurability, New Left Review, 211, 70-88. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez Alier J., 2002. The Environmentalism of the poor: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
- Martinez J., 2019. When it comes to latinidad, who is included and who isn’t?, Remezcla, 30 juillet, https://remezcla.com/features/culture/when-it-comes-to-latinidad-who-is-included-and-who-isnt. [Google Scholar]
- Meadows D.H., Meadows D.L., Randers J., Behrens III W.W., 1972. The Limits to Growth—Club of Rome, Potomac Associates – Universe Books. [Google Scholar]
- Merlinsky M.G., 2009. Atravesando el Río: la construcción social y política de la cuestión ambiental en Argentina: dos estudios de caso en torno al conflicto por las plantas de celulosa en el Río Uruguay y al conflicto por el saneamiento de la Cuenca Matanza-Riachuelo. Thèse de doctorat en géographie, Saint-Denis, Université Paris 8. [Google Scholar]
- Peet R., Watts M., 1993. Introduction: development theory and environment in an age of market triumphalism, Economic Geography, 69, 3, 227-253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Peet R., Watts M., 1996. Liberating political ecology, in Peet R., Watts M. (Eds), Liberation ecologies. Environment, development, social movements, London/New York, Routledge, 1-45. [Google Scholar]
- Porto-Gonçalves C.W., 2006. A reinvenção dos territórios: a experiência latino-americana e caribenha, Los desafíos de las emancipaciones en un contexto militarizado, Buenos Aires, CLACSO, 151-197. [Google Scholar]
- Porto-Gonçalves C.W., Leff E., 2015. Political Ecology in Latin America: the social re-appropriation of nature, the reinvention of territories and the construction of an environmental rationality, Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, 35, https://doi.org/10.5380/dma.v35i0.43543. [Google Scholar]
- Poudray V., 2021. Le design et les dynamiques de transformation de l’action publique. Thèse de doctorat en géographie, Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes. [Google Scholar]
- Rivera Cusicanqui S., 2007. Décoloniser la sociologie et la société. Entretien avec Silvia Rivera Cusicanqui réalisé par Pascale Absi, Journal des anthropologues, 110-111, 249-265. https://doi.org/10.4000/jda.2473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Robbins P., 2012. Political ecology: a critical introduction, Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
- Rocheleau D.E., 1995. Gender and biodiversity: a feminist political ecology perspective, IDS Bulletin, 26, 1, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.1995.mp26001002.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roué M., 2003. ONG, peuples autochtones et savoirs locaux : enjeux de pouvoir dans le champ de la biodiversité, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 11, 1, 97-98, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1240-1307(03)00014-1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Sultana F., 2021. Political ecology 1: from margins to center, Progress in Human Geography, 45, 1, 156-165, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520936751. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Svampa M., Viale E., 2014. Maldesarrollo: la Argentina del extractivismo y el despojo, Buenos Aires/Madrid, Katz. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Toledo V.M., 2000. La paz en Chiapas: ecología, luchas indígenas y modernidad alternativa, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. [Google Scholar]
- Trevilla Espinal D.L., Peña Azcona I., 2020. Territorializar la soberanía alimentaria. Prácticas feministas en el sur de México, LEISA revista de agroecología, 36, 1, 28-30, www.leisa-al.org/web/images/stories/revistapdf/vol36n1.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Tzul Tzul G., 2019. La forma comunal de la resistencia, Revista de la Universidad de México. [Google Scholar]
- Watts M.R., 1983. Silent violence: food, Famine and peasantry in Northern Nigeria, Berkeley, University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
- Whiteside K.H., 2002. Divided natures. French contributions to political ecology, Cambridge, The MIT Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf E., 1972. Ownership and political ecology, Anthropological Quarterly, 45, 3, 201-205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.