Open Access
| Issue |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 26, Number 2, April-June 2018
Dossier « La fabrique de la compensation écologique : controverses et pratiques »
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 150 - 158 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018040 | |
| Published online | 31 August 2018 | |
- Bas A., Gastineau P., Hay J., Levrel H., 2013. Méthodes d’équivalence et compensation du dommage environnemental, Revue d’économie politique, 123, 1, 127-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bas A., 2017. Analyse de la compensation écologique comme instrument d’internalisation et de lutte contre l’érosion de la biodiversité marine. Illustration par l’éolien en mer. Thèse de doctorat en économie, Brest, Université de Bretagne-Occidentale. [Google Scholar]
- Baujard A., 2011. L’économie du bien-être est morte. Vive l’économie du bien-être !, Economics Working Paper, Université de Rennes 1/Université de Caen, Centre de recherche en économie et management (CREM), https://crem-doc.univ-rennes1.fr/wp/2011/201102.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Bentham J., 1781. The principles of morals and legislation, Oxford, The Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar]
- Boisvert V., 2015. Conservation banking mechanisms and the economization of nature: an institutional analysis, Ecosystem Services, 15, 134-142. [Google Scholar]
- Bontems P., Rotillon G., 2007. L’économie de l’environnement, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
- Bull J.W., Abatayo A.L., Strange N., 2017. Counterintuitive proposals for trans-boundary ecological compensation under ‘no net loss’ biodiversity policy, Ecological Economics, 142, 185-193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Calvet C., Napoléone C., Salles J.-M., 2015. The biodiversity offsetting dilemma: between economic rationales and ecological dynamics, Sustainability, 7, 6, 7357-7378. [Google Scholar]
- Coase R.H., 1960. The problem of social cost, The Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1-44. [Google Scholar]
- Coggan A., Buitelaar E., Whitten S., Bennett J., 2013. Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: who bears what and why?, Ecological Economics, 88, 222-231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Couvet D. (Ed.), 2017. Compensation et infrastructures linéaires. Stratégies et scénarios pour l’action (Compilsa) : la compensation face à ses limites écologiques et organisationnelles. Rapport final d’activité, Programme infrastructures de transports terrestres, écosystèmes et paysages (ITTECOP), Paris, Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l’Énergie/Ademe, http://www.ittecop.fr/images/docman-files/docman-files/rapport-final/2014/RF_2014_COMPILSA_VF.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Cowell R., 2003. Substitution and scalar politics: negotiating environmental compensation in Cardiff Bay, Geoforum, 34, 3, 343-358. [Google Scholar]
- Guillet F., Semal L., 2018. Policy flaws of biodiversity offsetting as a conservation strategy, Biological Conservation, 221, 86-90. [Google Scholar]
- Jacob C., Vaissière A.-C., Bas A., Calvet C., 2016. Investigating the inclusion of ecosystem services in biodiversity offsetting, Ecosystem Services, 21, Part A, 92-102. [Google Scholar]
- Kermagoret C., Levrel H., Carlier A., 2014. The impact and compensation of offshore wind farm development: analysing the institutional discourse from a French case study, Scottish Geographical Journal, 130, 3, 188-206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kermagoret C., Levrel H., Carlier A., 2015. La compensation au service de l’acceptabilité sociale : un état de l’art des apports empiriques et du débat scientifique : réflexions au service du développement de l’énergie éolienne en mer, VertigO, 15, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Kermagoret C., Levrel H., Carlier A., Dachary-Bernard J., 2016. Individual preferences regarding environmental offset and welfare compensation: a choice experiment application to an offshore wind farm project, Ecological Economics, 129, 230-240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Levrel H., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Hay J., Martin G., Pioch S. (Eds), 2015. Restaurer la nature pour atténuer les impacts du développement. Analyse des mesures compensatoires pour la biodiversité, Versailles, Quæ. [Google Scholar]
- Levrel H., 2012. La conservation de la biodiversité à partir du principe de compensation. Promesses et limites d’un nouvel avatar du développement durable. Rapport d’habilitation à diriger des recherches en économie, Brest, Université de Bretagne-Occidentale. [Google Scholar]
- Levrel H., Pioch S., Spieler R., 2012. Compensatory mitigation in marine ecosystems: which indicators for assessing the “no net loss” goal of ecosystem services and ecological functions?, Marine Policy, 36, 6, 1202-1210. [Google Scholar]
- Levrel H., Scemama P., Vaissière A.-C., 2017. Should we be wary of mitigation banking? Evidence regarding the risks associated with this wetland offset arrangement in Florida, Ecological Economics, 135, 136-149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lockwood M., 1996. Non-compensatory preference structures in non-market valuation of natural area policy, Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, 2, 85-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Masten S.E., Meehan J.W., Snyder E.A., 1991. The costs of organization, The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7, 1, 1-25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ménard C., 2011. A new institutional economics perspective on environmental issues, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 1, 115-120. [Google Scholar]
- Ménard C., Shirley M.M. (Eds), 2005. Handbook of new institutional economics, Dordrecht, Springer. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- North D.C., 1991. Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 1, 97-112. [Google Scholar]
- Pearce D., 2007. Do we really care about biodiversity?, Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 1, 313-333. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Pigou A.C., 1920. Economics of welfare, London, McMillan & Co. [Google Scholar]
- Quétier F., Lavorel S., 2011. Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes: key issues and solutions, Biological Conservation, 144, 12, 2991-2999. [Google Scholar]
- Roussel S., Tardieu L., Vaissière A.-C., 2018. Compensation écologique et agriculture : est-ce compatible ?, Revue Économique, prépublication (0), 183-198, https://www.cairn.info/revue-economique-2018-0.htm. [Google Scholar]
- Rulleau B., Dachary-Bernard J., 2013. Identification et analyse des préférences lexicographiques en évaluation économique, Économie et Statistique, 460-461, 129-144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Saussier S., Yvrande-Billon A., 2007. Économie des coûts de transaction, Paris, La Découverte. [Google Scholar]
- Scemama P., 2014. Analyse néo-institutionnelle de l’investissement dans la biodiversité : choix organisationnels et leurs conséquences sur la restauration des écosystèmes aquatiques. Thèse de doctorat en économie, Brest, Université de Bretagne-Occidentale. [Google Scholar]
- Scemama P., Levrel H., 2013. L’émergence du marché de la compensation des zones humides aux États-Unis : impacts sur les modes d’organisation et les caractéristiques des transactions, Revue d’économie politique, 123, 6, 893-924. [Google Scholar]
- Scemama P., Levrel H., 2016. Using habitat equivalency analysis to assess the cost effectiveness of restoration outcomes in four institutional contexts, Environmental Management, 57, 1, 109-122. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scitovsky T., 1941. A note on welfare propositions in economics, The Review of Economic Studies, 9, 77-88. [Google Scholar]
- Vaissière A.-C., Levrel H., 2015. Biodiversity offset markets: what are they really? An empirical approach to wetland mitigation banking, Ecological Economics, 110, 81-88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vaissière A.-C., Levrel H., Scemama P., 2017a. Biodiversity offsetting: clearing up misunderstandings between conservation and economics to take further action, Biological Conservation, 206, 258-262. [Google Scholar]
- Vaissière A.-C., Levrel H., Pioch S., 2017b. Wetland mitigation banking: negotiations with stakeholders in a zone of ecological-economic viability, Land Use Policy, 69, 512-518. [Google Scholar]
- Vaissière A.-C., Tardieu L., Quétier F., Roussel S., 2018a. Preferences for biodiversity offset contracts on arable land: a choice experiment study with farmers, European Review of Agricultural Economics, https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jby006. [Google Scholar]
- Vaissière A.-C., Quétier F., Bas A., Calvet C., Gaucherand S., Hay J., Jacob C., Kermagoret C., Levrel H., Malapert A., Pioch S., Scemama P., 2018b. France, in Wende W., Tucker G.M., Quétier F., Rayment M., Darbi M. (Eds), Biodiversity offsets. European perspectives on no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, Cham, Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Wende W., Tucker G.-M., Quétier F., Rayment M., Darbi M. (Eds), 2018. Biodiversity offsets. European perspectives on no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, Cham, Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Williamson O.E., 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting, New York/London, Free Press/Collier Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.