EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 25 / No 4 (October-December 2017) Nat. Sci. Soc., 25 4 (2017) 370-380 References
Open Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 25, Number 4, October-December 2017
Dossier « Des recherches participatives dans la production des savoirs liés à l’environnement »
Page(s) 370 - 380
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2018004
Published online 19 February 2018
  • Alender B., 2016. Understanding volunteer motivations to participate in citizen science projects: a deeper look at water quality monitoring, JCOM - Journal of Science Communication, 15, 3, 1-19, https://jcom.sissa.it/archive/15/03/JCOM_1503_2016_A04. [Google Scholar]
  • Bell S., Marzano M., Cent J., Kobierska H., Podjed D., Vandzinskaite D., Muršiš R., 2008. What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity, Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 14, 3443-3454, doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9357-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bonney R., Ballard H., Jordan R., McCallie E., Phillips T., Shirk J., Wilderman C.C., 2009. Public participation in scientific research: defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report, Washington (DC), Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE), http://www.birds.cornell.edu/citscitoolkit/publications/CAISE-PPSR-report-2009.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Bœuf G., Allain Y.-M., Bouvier M., 2012. L’apport des sciences participatives dans la connaissance de la biodiversité en France. Rapport, Paris, ministère de l’Écologie, http://temis.documentation.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/docs/Temis/0081/Temis-0081293/21789.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Buytaert W., Zulkafli Z., Grainger S., Acosta L., Alemie T.C., Bastiaensen J., De Bièvre B., Bhusal J., Clark J., Dewulf A., Foggin M., Hannah D.M., Hergarten C., Isaeva A., Karpouzoglou T., Pandeya B., Paudel D., Sharma K., Steenhuis T., Tilahun S., Van Hecken G., Zhumanova M., 2014. Citizen science in hydrology and water resources: opportunities for knowledge generation, ecosystem service management, and sustainable development, Frontiers in Earth Science, 2, 26, 1-21, doi: 10.3389/feart.2014.00026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Charvolin F., Micoud A., Nyhart L.K. (Eds.), 2007. Des sciences citoyennes ? La question de l’amateur dans les sciences naturalistes, La Tour-d’Aigues, Éditions de l’Aube. [Google Scholar]
  • Clark F., Illman D.L., 2001. Dimensions of civic science. Introductory essay, Science Communication, 23, 1, 5-27, doi: 10.1177/1075547001023001002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cohn J.P., 2008. Citizen science: can volunteers do real research?, BioScience, 58, 3, 192-197, doi: 10.1641/B580303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Collins H.M., Evans R., 2002. The third wave of science studies. Studies of expertise and experience, Social Studies of Science, 32, 2, 235-296, doi: 10.1177/0306312702032002003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cornwell M.L., Campbell L.M., 2012. Co-producing conservation and knowledge: citizen-based sea turtle monitoring in North Carolina, USA. Social Studies of Science, 42, 1, 101-120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Couvet D., Teyssèdre A., 2013. Sciences participatives et biodiversité : de l’exploration à la transformation des socio-écosystèmes, Cahiers des Amériques latines, 72-73, 49-64, doi: 10.4000/cal.2792. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crall A.W., Newman G.J., Stohlgren T.J., Holfelder K.A., Graham J., Waller D.M., 2011. Assessing citizen science data quality: an invasive species case study, Conservation Letters, 4, 6, 433-442, doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00196.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crowston K., Prestopnik N.R., 2013. Motivation and data quality in a citizen science game: a design science evaluation, in Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 7th-10th January,Hawaii, IEEE, 450-459, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2013.413. [Google Scholar]
  • Dias da Silva P., Heaton L., 2015. Citizens, amateurs, volunteers: conceptual struggles in studies of citizen science. Note de recherche 2015-01, Montréal, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche sur la science et la technologie (CIRST). [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards R., 2014. Citizen science and lifelong learning, Studies in the Education of Adults, 46, 2, 132-144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis R., Waterton C., 2004. Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy, Science and Public Policy, 31, 2, 95-105, doi: 10.3152/147154304781780055. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis R., Waterton C., Wynne B., 2010. Taxonomy, biodiversity and their publics in twenty-first-century DNA barcoding, Public Understanding of Science, 19, 4, 497-512, doi: 10.1177/0963662509335413. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Epstein S., 1996. Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge, Berkeley, University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Flichy P., 2010. Le sacre de l’amateur. Sociologie des passions ordinaires à l’ère numérique, Paris, Seuil. [Google Scholar]
  • Fore L.S., Paulsen K., O’Laughlin K., 2001. Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams, Freshwater Biology, 46, 1, 109-123, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2001.00640.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Granjou C., 2008. Quand chercheurs et citoyens coproduisent les savoirs et les décisions scientifiques et techniques (3e conférence internationale “Living Knowledge”). Compte rendu de colloque (Paris, 30 août-1er septembre 2007), Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16, 4, 385-386, doi: 10.1051/nss/2008073. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gura T., 2013. Citizen science: amateur experts, Nature, 496, 7444, 259-261, https://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj7444-259a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Haklay M., 2013. Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation, in Sui D., Elwood S., Goodchild M. (Eds), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge, Dordrecht, Springer, 105-122, doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haywood B.K., 2014. A “Sense of place” in public participation in scientific research, Science Education, 98, 1, 64-83, doi: 10.1002/sce.21087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heaton L., Millerand F., Crespel É., Proulx S., 2011. La réactualisation de la contribution des amateurs à la botanique, Terrains & Travaux, 18, 1, 155-173, https://www.cairn.info/revue-terrains-et-travaux-2011-1-page-155.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Heaton L., Millerand F., Liu X., Crespel É., 2016. Participatory science: encouraging public engagement in ONEM, International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6, 1, 1-22, doi: 10.1080/21548455.2014.942241. [Google Scholar]
  • Hine C., 2008. Systematics as cyberscience: computers, change, and continuity in science, Cambridge (Mass.), The MIT Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hochachka W.M., Fink D., Hutchinson R.A., Sheldon D., Wong W.-K., Kelling S., 2012. Data-intensive science applied to broad-scale citizen science, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27, 2, 130-137, doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.006. [Google Scholar]
  • Houllier F., Merilhou-Goudard J.-B., 2016. Les sciences participatives en France. État des lieux, bonnes pratiques et recommandations. Rapport, Paris, ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, doi: 10.15454/1.4606201248693647E12. [Google Scholar]
  • Hubert B., Aubertin C., Billaud J.-P., 2013. Recherches participatives, recherches citoyennes.. une clarification nécessaire, Natures Sciences Sociétés, 21, 1, 1-2, doi: 10.1051/nss/2013078. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Irwin A., 1995. Citizen science: a study of people, expertise, and sustainable development, Londres, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs C., 2016. Data quality in crowdsourcing for biodiversity research: issues and examples, in Capineri C., Haklay M., Huang H., Antoniou V., Kettunen J., Ostermann F., Purves R. (Eds), European handbook of crowdsourced geographic information, London, Ubiquity Press, 75-86, doi: 10.5334/bax.f. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson M.F., Hannah C., Acton L., Popovici R., Karanth K.K., Weinthal E., 2014. Network environmentalism: citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy, Global Environmental Change, 29, 235-245, doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kamar E., Hacker S., Horvitz E., 2012. Combining human and machine intelligence in large-scale crowdsourcing, in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Volume 1, June 04-08, Valencia, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 467-474. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelling S., Yu J., Gerbracht J., Wong W.-K., 2011. Emergent filters: automated data verification in a large-scale citizen science project, in 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science. Workshop proceedings, 5th-8th December, Stockholm, IEEE, 20-27, doi: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.13. [Google Scholar]
  • Kinchy A., Jalbert K., Lyons J., 2014. What is volunteer water monitoring good for? Fracking and the plural logics of participatory science, in Frickel S., Hess D.J. (Eds), Fields of knowledge: science, politics and publics in the neoliberal age, Bingley, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 259-289, doi: 10.1108/S0198-871920140000027017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kosmala M., Wiggins A., Swanson A., Simmons B., 2016. Assessing data quality in citizen science, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 10, 551-560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lievrouw L.A., 2010. Social media and the production of knowledge: a return to little science?, Social Epistemology, 24, 3, 219-237, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2010.499177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Matagne P., 2006. Les sciences citoyennes. Vigilance collective et rapport entre profane et scientifique dans les sciences naturalistes. Compte rendu de colloque (Saint-Étienne, 13-14 janvier 2005), Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14, 4, 425-427, doi: 10.1051/nss:2007012. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Mericskay B., Roche S., 2011. Cartographie 2.0 : le grand public, producteur de contenus et de savoirs géographiques avec le web 2.0, Cybergeo : European Journal of Geography, doi: 10.4000/cybergeo.24710. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller-Rushing A., Primack R., Bonney R., 2012. The history of public participation in ecological research, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 6, 285-290, doi: 10.1890/110278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Miyazaki Y., Murase A., Shiina M., Naoe K., Nakashiro R., Honda J., Senou H., 2014. Biological monitoring by citizens using web-based photographic databases of fishes, Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 9, 2383-2391, doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0724-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nascimento S., Pereira Â., Ghezzi A., 2014. From citizen science to do it yourself science. An annotated account of an on-going movement, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC93942. [Google Scholar]
  • Newman G., Wiggins A., Crall A., Graham E., Newman S., Crowston K., 2012. The future of citizen science: emerging technologies and shifting paradigms, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 6, 298-304, doi: 10.1890/110294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen M., 2012. Reinventing discovery: the new era of networked science, Princeton (NJ)., Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Piron F., Duranceau M.-F., Pion L. (Eds), 2009. Aux sciences, citoyens ! Expériences et méthodes de consultation sur les enjeux scientifiques de notre temps, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal. [Google Scholar]
  • Rotman D., Preece J., Hammock J., Procita K., Hansen D., Parr C., Lewis D., Jacobs D., 2012. Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects, in Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February 11-15, Seattle, New York, ACM, 217-226, doi: 10.1145/2145204.2145238. [Google Scholar]
  • Roy H.E., Pocock M.J.O., Preston C.D., Roy D.B., Savage J., Tweddle J.C., Robinson L.D., 2012. Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework, NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology and Natural History Museum. [Google Scholar]
  • Secord A., 1994. Science in the pub: artisan botanists in early nineteenth-century Lancashire, History of Science, 32, 3, 269-315, doi: 10.1177/007327539403200302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Serrano Sanz F., Holocher-Ertl T., Kieslinger B., Sanz García F., Silva C.G., 2014. White paper on citizen science for Europe, Bruxelles, Commission européenne. [Google Scholar]
  • Silvertown J., 2009. A new dawn for citizen science, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24, 9, 467471, doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017. [Google Scholar]
  • Socientize consortium, 2013. Green paper on citizen science. Citizen science for Europe: towards a better society of empowered citizens and enhanced research, Bruxelles, Commission européenne. [Google Scholar]
  • Stebbins R.A., 1992. Amateurs, professionals, and serious leisure, Montreal, McGill-Queen’s University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Suomela T., 2014. Citizen science: framing the public, information exchange, and communication in crowdsourced science. Thèse de doctorat, University of Tennessee, http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2864. [Google Scholar]
  • Thiel M., Penna-Díaz M.A., Luna-Jorquera G., Sala S., Sellanes J., Stotz W., 2014. Citizen scientists and marine research: volunteer participants, their contributions, and projection for the future, in Hugues R.N., Hugues D.J., Smith I.P. (Eds), Oceanography and Marine Biology. An Annual Review, 52, Boca Raton, CRC Press, 257-314. [Google Scholar]
  • Tulloch A.I.T., Possingham H.P., Joseph L.N., Szabo J., Martin T.G., 2013. Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs, Biological Conservation, 165, 128-138, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.05.025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiggins A., Newman G., Stevenson R.D., Crowston K., 2011. Mechanisms for data quality and validation in citizen science, in 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science. Workshop proceedings, 5th-8th December, Stockholm, IEEE, 14-19, doi: 10.1109/eScienceW.2011.27. [Google Scholar]
  • Wynne B. 1992. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 3, 281-304. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.