Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Number 1, janvier-mars 2012
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » (suite)
Page(s) 39 - 51
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011134
Published online 04 July 2012
  • Bréthaut, C., Nahrath, S., 2010. Entre imbrication, instrumentalisation et infusion : le rôle des consortages de bisses et des bourgeoisies dans les politiques de gestion de l’eau à Crans-Montana, Sion, Working paper de l’IUKB, 5, http://www.iukb.ch/fileadmin/ut/wp5.pdf.
  • Bromley, D.W. (Ed.), 1992. Making the commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy, San Francisco, ICS Press.
  • Gerber, J.-D., 2005. Structures de gestion des rivalités d’usage du paysage : une analyse comparée de trois cas alpins, Zurich, Rüegger Verlag.
  • Gerber, J.-D., Nahrath, S., Reynard, E., Thomi, L., 2008. The role of common pool resource institutions in the implementation of Swiss natural resource management policy, International Journal of the Commons, 2, 2, 222-247.
  • Gerber, J.-D., Knoepfel, P., Nahrath, S., Varone, F., 2009. Institutional resource regimes: Towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis, Ecological Economics, 68, 3, 798-809. [CrossRef]
  • Gerber, J.-D., Nahrath, S., Csikos, P., Knoepfel, P., 2011. The role of Swiss civic corporations in land-use planning, Environment and Planning A, 43, 185-204. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Jobert, B., Muller, P., 1987. L’État en action. Politiques publiques et corporatismes, Paris, PUF.
  • Knoepfel, P., Kissling-Naef, I., Varone, F. (Eds), 2001. Institutionelle Regime für natürliche Ressourcen [Régimes institutionnels de ressources naturelles : analyse comparée du sol, de l’eau et de la forêt], Bâle/Genève/Münich, Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
  • Knoepfel, P., Kissling-Naef, I., Varone, F. (Eds), 2003. Institutionelle Regime für natürlicher Ressourcen in Aktion [Régimes institutionnels de ressources naturelles en action], Basel, Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
  • Knoepfel, P., Nahrath, S., Varone, F., 2007. Institutional regimes for natural resources: An innovative theoretical framework for sustainability, in Knoepfel, P. (Ed.), Environmental Policy Analyses. Learning from the Past for the Future – 25 Years of Research, Berlin, Springer, 455-506.
  • Knoepfel, P., Nahrath, S., Savary, J., Varone, F., 2010. Analyse des politiques suisses de l’environnement, Zurich, Chur, Ruegger Verlag.
  • Linder, W., 1994. Swiss Democracy. Possible Solutions to Conflict in Multicultural Societies, Houndmills, MacMillan Press.
  • Mc Netting, R., 1981. Balancing on an Alp: Ecological Change and Continuity in a Swiss Mountain Community, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
  • McKean, M., Ostrom, E., 1995. Common property regimes in the forest: just a relic from the past?, Unasylva, 46, 180, 3-15.
  • Nahrath, S., 2000a. "Governing Wildlife Resources?" L’organisation de la chasse en Suisse comme exemple de régimes institutionnels de gestion d’une ressource naturelle, Swiss Political Science Review, 6, 1, 123-158. [CrossRef]
  • Nahrath, S., 2000b. "Governing Wildlife Commons?" A Comparative Analysis of Switzerland’s Three Hunting Systems. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), http://en.scientificcommons.org/1543949.
  • Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.
  • Ostrom, E., 1992. The rudiments of a theory of the origins, survival, and performance of common-property institutions, in Bromley, D.W. (Ed.), Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice, and Policy, San Francisco, ICS Press, 293-318.
  • Ostrom, E., 2000. Reformulating the commons, Swiss Political Science Review, 6, 1, 29-52. [CrossRef]
  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J.M., 1994. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
  • Thomi, L., 2005. La gestion de l’aménagement des cours d’eau dans les cantons suisses de Glaris, de Berne et du Valais, Geographica Helvetica, 60, 35-43. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.