Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Number 1, janvier-mars 2012
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » (suite)
Page(s) 52 - 65
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011132
Published online 04 July 2012
  • Allain, S., 2001. Planification participative de bassin et gouvernement de l’eau, Géocarrefour, 76, 3, 199-209. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Allain, S., 2002. A “Negotiated Public Action”. Perspective for Public Management. Communication au 18e colloque de l’EGOS, Barcelone, 4-6 juin. [Google Scholar]
  • Allain, S., 2004. La négociation comme concept analytique central d’une théorie de la régulation sociale, Négociations, 2, 23-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Allain, S., 2008. Négocier le bien commun territorial. Esquisse d’une sociologie de médiation. Mémoire d’HDR en Sociologie de l’IEP de Paris, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Allain, S., 2010. Social Participation in French water management, in Berry, K., Mollard, E. (Eds), Social Participation in Water Governance and Management, London, Earthscan Publishers, 95-114. [Google Scholar]
  • Bates, R.H., 1988. Contra contractarianism, Politics and Society, 16, 387-401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bingham, L.B., Nabatchi, T., O’Leary, R., 2005. The new governance, Public Administration Review, 65, 5, 547-558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blomquist, W., 1992. Dividing the Waters, San Francisco, CA, ICS Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Bollier, D., 2007. The growth of the commons paradigm, in Hess, C., Ostrom, E. (Eds), Understanding Knowledge as a commons, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 27-40. [Google Scholar]
  • Durant, R.F., 2004. Reconnecting with stakeholders, in Durant, R.F., Fiorino, D.J., O’Leary, R. (Eds), Environmental Governance Reconsidered, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 177-182. [Google Scholar]
  • Hardy, S.D., Koontz, T.M., 2009. Rules for collaboration, The Policy Studies Journal, 37, 3, 393-414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Imperial, M.T., 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy, Administration and Society, 37, 281-320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Imperial, M.T., Hennessey, T., 2000. Environmental Governance in Watersheds, Washington, DC, National Academy of Public Administration. [Google Scholar]
  • Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E., 2010. Planning with Complexity, London/New York, Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  • Kenney, D.S., McAllister, S.T., Caile, W.H., Peckham, J.S., 2000. The New Watershed Source Book, Boulder, University of Colorado School of Law. [Google Scholar]
  • Kiser, L.L., Ostrom, E., 1982. The three worlds of action, in Ostroms E. (Ed.), Strategies of Political Inquiry, Beverly Hills, SAGE, 179-222. [Google Scholar]
  • Koontz, T.M., Johnson, E.M., 2004. One size does not fit all, Policy Sciences, 37, 185-204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leach, W.D., 2006. Collaborative public management and democracy, Public Administration Review, 66, s1, 100-110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., 2001. Making watershed partnerships work, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127, 378-385. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Leach, W.D., Pelkey, N.W., Sabatier, P.A., 2002. Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 4, 645-670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lovan, W.R., Murray, M., Shaffer, R., 2004. Participatory Governance, Burlington, Ashgate. [Google Scholar]
  • Lubell, M., Schneider, J., Mete, M., 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions, American Journal of Political Science, 46, 1, 148-163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • March, J.G., Olsen, J.P., 1995. Democratic Governance, New York, The Free Press. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Leary, R., Bingham, L.B. (Eds), 2009. The Collaborative Public Manager, Washington, DC, Georgetown University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom, E., 1999. Institutional rational choice, in Sabatier, P.A. (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, Westview Press, 35-71. [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P.C., Stonich, S., Weber, E.U. (Eds), 2002. The Drama of the Commons, Washington, DC, National Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynaud, J.-D., 2003. La négociation, l’accord, le dispositif, in de Terssac, G. (Ed.), La Théorie de la régulation sociale de Jean-Daniel Reynaud, Paris, La Découverte, 179-190. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynaud, J.-D., 2008. Négociation et action collective, Négociations, 1, 9, 121-124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ryan, B., Ryan, C., 2006. Collaborative partnership design, Society and Natural Resources, 19, 9, 827-843. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sabatier, P.A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., Matlock, M., 2005. Swimming Upstream, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Singleton, S., Taylor, M., 1992. Common property, collective action and community, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 4, 3, 309-324. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Ostrom, E., Stonich, S., 2002. Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research, in Ostrom et al. (2002), op. cit., 445-489. [Google Scholar]
  • Strauss, A., 1978. Negotiations, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  • Susskind, L.E., McKearnan, S., Thomas-Larmer, J., 1999. The Consensus-Building Handbook, London, SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor, M., Singleton, S., 1993. The communal resource, Politics and Society, 21, 195-214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wondolleck, J.M., Yafee, S.L., 2000. Making Collaboration Work, Washington, DC, Island Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.