Free Access
Issue
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Number 3, juillet-septembre 2011
Page(s) 224 - 235
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011145
Published online 15 December 2011
  • Andrieu, O., 1998. Trouver l’info sur l’Internet, Paris, Eyrolles. [Google Scholar]
  • Barnaud, G., 1995. À l’interface de la pratique et de la théorie : l’écologie de la restauration, Natures Sciences Sociétés, hors-série « Recréer la nature », 36-50. [Google Scholar]
  • Bash, J.S., Ryan, C.M., 2002. Stream restoration and enhancement projects: Is anyone monitoring?, Environmental Management, 29, 6, 877-885. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bazin, P., Barnaud, G., 2002. Du suivi à l’évaluation : à la recherche d’indicateurs opérationnels en écologie de la restauration, La Terre et la Vie : revue d’écologie, supplément 9, 201-224. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernhardt, E.S., Sudduth, E.B., Palmer, M.A., Allan, J.D., Meyer, J.L., Alexander, G., Follastad-Shah, J., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Lave, R., Rumps, J., Pagano, L., 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: Results from a survey of U.S. river restoration practitioners, Restoration Ecology, 15, 3, 482-493. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boni, A., Stemart, N., 2008. Google, Paris, Micro Application. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradshaw, A.D., 1996. Underlying principles of restoration, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53, Supp. 1, 3-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cairns, J., Jr., Heckman, J.R., 1996. Restoration ecology: The state of an emerging field, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 21, 167-89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dufour, S., Piégay, H., 2009. From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: Forget natural references and focus on human benefits, River Research and Applications, 25, 5, 568-581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Habersack, H., Piégay, H., 2007. River restoration in the Alps and their surroundings: Past experience and future challenges, in Habersack, H., Piégay, H., Rinaldi, M. (Eds), Gravel-Bed Rivers 6: From Process Understanding to the Restoration of Mountain Rivers. Developments in Earth Surface Processes, Amsterdam & London, Elsevier B.V., 703-708. [Google Scholar]
  • Jenkinson, R.G., Barnas, K.A., Braatne, J.H., Bernhardt, E.S., Palmer, M.A., Allan, J.D., The National River Restoration Science Synthesis, 2006. Stream restoration databases and case studies: A guide to information resources and their utility in advancing the science and practice of restoration, Restoration Ecology, 14, 2, 177-186. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Kondolf, G.M., Micheli, E.R., 1995. Evaluating stream restoration projects, Environmental Management, 19, 1, 1-15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kondolf, G.M., Anderson, S., Lave, R., Pagano, L., Merenlender, A., Bernhardt, E.S., 2007. Two decades of river restoration in California: What can we learn?, Restoration Ecology, 15, 3, 516-523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lachat, B., Adam, P., Frossard, P.-A., Marcaud, R., 1994. Guide de protection des berges de cours d’eau en techniques végétales, Paris, Ministère de l’Aménagement du territoire et de l’Environnement, DIREN Rhône-Alpes. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Floc’h, É., Aronson, J., 1995. Écologie de la restauration : définition de quelques concepts de base, Natures Sciences Sociétés, hors-série « Recréer la nature », 29-35. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Lay, Y.-F., Piégay, H., Gregory, K., Chin, A., Dolédec, S., Elosegi, A., Mutz, M., Wyzga, B., Zawiejska, J., 2008. Variations in cross-cultural perception of riverscapes in relation to in-channel wood, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33, 2, 268-287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Malavoi, J.-R., Adam, P., 2007. La restauration hydromorphologique des cours d’eau : concepts et principes de mise en œuvre, Ingénieries-EAT, 50, 49-61. [Google Scholar]
  • Maniez, D., 2008. Les Dix Plaies d’Internet : les dangers d’un outil fabuleux, Paris, Dunod. [Google Scholar]
  • National Research Council (NRC), 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems, Washington (DC), Academy Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer, M.A., Bernhardt, E.S., 2006. Hydroecology and river restoration: Ripe for research an synthesis, Water Resources Research, 42, W03S07. [Google Scholar]
  • Piégay, H., Bornette, G., Lamouroux, N., 2009. Geomorphology and river restoration feedback and outstanding issue in the hydrographic district of the Rhône river. River restoration as a collaboration with nature, in Gumiero, B., Rinaldi, M., Fokkens, B. (Eds), Proceedings: IVth ECRR International Conference on River Restoration 2008, Venice, San Servolo Island, 16-19 June 2008, ECRR/CIRF, Venice Editor, 67-82. [Google Scholar]
  • Roni, P., Hanson, K., Beechie, T., Pess, G., Pollock, M., Bartley, D.M., 2005. Habitat Rehabilitation for Inland Fisheries: Global Review of Effectiveness and Guidance for Rehabilitation of Freshwater Ecosystems. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 484. FAO, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Sachon, G., Ahyerre, M., Wasson, J.-G., 2003. Diagnostic et restauration des milieux aquatiques pour 2015. Quelques questions soulevées par la directive-cadre européenne sur l’eau, Techniques Sciences Méthodes, 1, 39-44. [Google Scholar]
  • Woolsey, S., Capelli, F., Gonser, T., Hoehn, E., Hostmann, M., Junker, B., Paetzolds, A., Roulier, C., Schweizer, S., Tiegs, S.D., Tockner, K., Weber, C., Peter, A., 2007. A strategy to assess river restoration success, Freshwater Biology, 52, 752-769. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.