Accès gratuit
Numéro
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 20, Numéro 1, janvier-mars 2012
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées » (suite)
Page(s) 66 - 74
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2012012
Publié en ligne 4 juillet 2012
  • Bromley, D., 1991. Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy, Oxford, Basil Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  • CEC (Commission of the European Community), 2008. Directive 2008/56/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive), Brussels, DG Environment. [Google Scholar]
  • CEC (Commission of the European Community), 2009. Green Paper: Reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, Brussels, DG MARE. [Google Scholar]
  • Degnbol, P., Gislason, H., Hanna, S., Jentoft, S., Raakjær Nielsen, J., Sverdrup-Jensen, S., Wilson, D.C., 2006. Painting the floor with a hammer, Marine Policy, 30, 534-543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Froese, R., 2011. Fishery reform slips through the Net, Nature, 475, 7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia, S.M., Zerbi, A., Aliaume, C., Do Chi, T., Lasserre, G., 2003. The ecosystem approach to fisheries. Issues, termi-nology, principles, institutional foundations, implementation and outlook, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 443, Rome, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Hannesson, R., 2004. The Privatization of the Oceans, Cambridge (Mass.), The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICES, 2003. ACFM Annual Report, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  • Loomis, D.K., Ditton, R.B., 1993. Distributive justice in fisheries management, Fisheries, 18, 2, 14-18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCay, B.J., Acheson, J.M. (Eds), 1987. The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, Tuscon (AZ), the University of Arizona Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Murray, G., Johnson, T., McCay, B.J., Danko, M., St. Martin, K., Takahashi, S., 2010. Creeping enclosure, cumulative effects and the marine commons, International Journal of the Commons, 4, 1, 367-389. [Google Scholar]
  • NSRAC, 2006. North Sea RAC Position Paper on the Review of Cod Recovery Measures, Edinburgh, North Sea Regional Advisory Council (http://www.nsrac.org/). [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons, New York, Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Reeves, S., 2005. Mixed Fisheries. Paper presented at the European Fisheries Advisory System Evaluation meeting of The European Fisheries and Aquaculture Research Organisation, Gdynia, 21-22 October 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchirico, J.N., Holland, D., Quigley, K., Fina, M., 2005. Catch-quota balancing in multi-species individual fishing quotas, Resources for the future, Discussion Paper, 05-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Short, C., 2008. The traditional commons of England and Wales in the twenty-first century: Meeting new and old challenges, International Journal of the Commons, 2, 2, 192–221. [Google Scholar]
  • STECF, 2003. Scientific, Technical, and Economic Committee for Fisheries, Plenary Report #17, Brussels, European Commission. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, D.C., Delaney, A.E., 2005. Scientific knowledge and participation in the management of fisheries in the North Sea, in Gray, T.S. (Ed), Participation in Fisheries Governance, Dordrecht, Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, D.C., 2009. The Paradoxes of Transparency: Science and the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management in Europe, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson, D.C., Jacobsen, R.B., 2009. Governance Issues in Mixed-Fisheries Management: An Analysis of Stakeholder Views, Deliverable 6.3 for a framework for fleet and area based fisheries management (AFRAME) Project. EU Sixth Framework Programme, Contract no.: 044168. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.