Open Access
| Numéro |
Nat. Sci. Soc.
Volume 19, Numéro 4, octobre-décembre 2011
Dossier « Le champ des commons en question : perspectives croisées »
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 432 - 435 | |
| Section | Libre opinion – Opinion | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/nss/2011160 | |
| Publié en ligne | 27 mars 2012 | |
- Anonymous, 1993. Are academic institutions corrupt? The Lancet, 342, 315-316. [Google Scholar]
- Bennett, D.M.,Taylor, D.M., 2003. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers, Emergency Medicine, 15, 263-270. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carbone, K.C., 2010. Fundamental change in German research policy, Science, 328, 569. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cronin, B., 2001. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 558-569. [Google Scholar]
- Cullington, B.J., 1998. Authorship, data ownership examined, Science, 242, 658. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Epstein, R.J., 1993. Six authors in search of a citation: villains or victims of the Vancouver convention? British Medical Journal, 306, 765-767. [Google Scholar]
- Flanagin, A.,Carey, L.A.,Fontanarosa, P.B.,Phillips, S.G.,Pace, B.P.,Lundberg, G.D.,Rennie, D., 1998. Prevalence of articles with honorary authors and ghost authors in peer-reviewed medical journals, Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 222-224. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fröhlingsdorf, M., Verbeet, M., 2009. Pilze im Kakao, Der Spiegel, 04/05. [Google Scholar]
- Gendron, Y., 2008. Constituting the academic performer: The spectre of superficiality and stagnation in academia, European Accounting Review, 17, 97-127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Greene, M., 2007. The demise of the lone author, Nature, 450, 1165. [Google Scholar]
- Hochberg, M.E.,Chase, J.M.,Gotelli, N.J.,Hastings, A.,Naeem, S., 2009. The tragedy of the reviewer commons, Ecology Letters, 12, 2-4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Horton, R., 1998. The unmasked carnival of science, The Lancet, 351, 688-689. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hudson, J., 1996. Trends in multi-authored papers in economics, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 153-158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jacqué, P., 2011. Peut-on évaluer la recherche ? Le Monde, 04/02. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, K.S.,Nwosu, C.R.,Khan, S.F.,Dwarakanath, L.S.,Chien, P.F.W., 1999. A controlled analysis of authorship trends over two decades, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 181, 503-507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence, P.A., 2003. The politics of publication, Nature, 422, 259-261, doi:10.1038/422259a. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence, P.A., 2007. The mismeasurement of science, Current Biology, 17, 583-585, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Louis, K.S.,Holdsworth, J.M.,Anderson, M.S.,Campbell, E.G., 2008. Everyday ethics in research: Translating authorship guidelines into practice in the bench sciences, Journal of Higher Education, 79, 88-112. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Marx, K., 1894. Le Capital, Livres II et III, in Œuvres, Paris, Gallimard, 1968. [Google Scholar]
- McClain, C., 2011. The mass extinction of scientists who study species, Wired Science, 19/01. [Google Scholar]
- Mulligan, A., 2004. Is peer review in crisis? Perspectives in Publishing, 2, 1-6. [Google Scholar]
- Noorden (Van), R., 2010. A profusion of measures, Nature, 465, 864-866. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osborne, J.W., Holland, A., 2009. What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14, 1-19. [Google Scholar]
- Pestre, D., 2003. Science, argent et politique. Un essai d’interprétation, Paris, Inra Éditions. [Google Scholar]
- Quan, S.F., 2008. Guests and ghosts begone–guest authorship and ghostwriting and the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 4, 203. [Google Scholar]
- Rennie, D.,Flanagin, A.,Yank, V., 2000. The contributions of authors, Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 89-91. [Google Scholar]
- Rohn, J., 2010. Reward effort, not luck, Nature, 465, 872. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Slone, R.M., 1996. Coauthors’ contributions to major papers published in the AJR: Frequency of undeserved coauthorship, American Journal of Roentgenology, 167, 571-579. [Google Scholar]
- Statzner, B.,Resh, V., 2010. Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: potential causes and consequences, Freshwater Biology, 55, 2639-2653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tainer, J.A., 1991. Science, citation, and funding, Science, 251, 1408. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tasch, W., 2008. Inquiries into the Nature of Slow Money. Investing as if Food, Farms, and Fertility Mattered, Chelsea, Chelsea Green Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Weltzin, J.,Belote, R.,Williams, L., 2006. Authorship in ecology: Attribution, accountability, and responsibility, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 4, 435-441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- West, J.D., 2010. Learn from game theory, Nature, 465, 871-872. [Google Scholar]
- Whitley, R., 2000. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Oxford, Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.